Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Passweg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bock, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Passweg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bock, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1996) 11: 2461-2465
© 1996 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Monoclonal gammopathy after intense induction immunosuppression in renal transplant patients

J. Passweg, G. Thiel and H. A. Bock

Division of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Department of Internal Madicine Kantonsspital Basel, Switzerland

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: H. A. Bock MD, Division of Nephrology, Kantonsspital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES.: Incidence and risk factors of post-transplant monoclonal gammopathy were studied in renal transplant patients who received their grafts between 1982 and 1992 (n=390 grafts). Immunoelectrophoresis was performed at annual intervals after transplantation.

RESULTS.: Forty-six cases of clonal gammopathy were detected: 35 monoclonal, 11 bi- or triclonal, with a predominance of IgG and K light-chain subtypes (IgG, 39; IgA, 3; IgM, 4; K, 35; {lambda}, 19). Gammopathy was transient in 17 patients (37%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of gammopathy was 10.7%, much higher than expected for a group of similar age from the general population. Thirty of the 46 gammopathies appeared within the first 2 years of transplantation. Gammopathy never progressed to multiple myeloma during follow-up (median 1 year; (range 0–10)); one patient subsequently developed Kaposi sarcoma. The 2-year incidence of gammopathy was much higher in patients transplanted in 1989–1991 (23/142) than in 1982–1988 (7/248) (P<0.0001). This coincided with the use of quadruple induction immunosuppression (cyclosporin A+azathioprine+prednisone plus either ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) or OKT3) since 1989. The risk for acquiring gammopathy within 2 years of transplantation was 14.7% (95% CI 9.2, 20.3%) in patients receiving quadruple induction therapy, but only 3.0% (CI 1.2, 6.1%) without such therapy (P<0.0001). The risk for patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 was 24.5%, significantly greater than with ATG-F (11.8%, P<0.05). Discriminant analysis revealed that the type of immunosuppression, but not age or year of transplantation, were independent risk factors for gammopathy.

CONCLUSIONS.: Monoclonal gammopathy frequently occurs after renal transplantation. Risks are higher for patients receiving quadruple induction immunosuppression, particularly if it includes OKT3. Follow-up of these patients is warranted for the early detection of malignant transformation.

Keywords: monoclonal gammopathy; kidney transplantation; prophylactic immunosuppression; monoclonal antibodies; polyclonal antibodies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
G. Knoll, S. Cockfield, T. Blydt-Hansen, D. Baran, B. Kiberd, D. Landsberg, D. Rush, E. Cole, and for The Kidney Transplant Working Group of the Can
Canadian Society of Transplantation: consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 8, 2005; 173(10): S1 - S25.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.