Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on April 29, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn216
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2768    most recent
gfn216v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lui, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lui, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Rapamycin attenuates the severity of established nephritis in lupus-prone NZB/W F1 mice

Sing Leung Lui1,2, Ryan Tsang2, Kwok Wah Chan3, Florence Zhang2, Sidney Tam4, Susan Yung2 and Tak Mao Chan2

1 Department of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Tung Wah Hospital 2 Department of Medicine 3 Department of Pathology, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital 4 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Tak Mao Chan, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China. Tel: + 852-2855-4542; Fax: + 852-2872-5828; E-mail: dtmchan{at}hku.hk



   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Rapamycin is a potent immunosuppressive drug with proven efficacy in rejection prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation. By virtue of its immunosuppressive properties, rapamycin might also be useful in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of rapamycin on the severity of established nephritis in lupus-prone New Zealand Black/White F1 (NZB/W F1) mice.

Methods. Six-month-old female NZB/W F1 mice with active nephritis (albuminuria >100 mg/dL) were treated with rapamycin (3 mg/kg body weight) or saline once daily by oral gavage for 4 months. The effect of rapamycin on the severity of nephritis was evaluated by clinical manifestations, biochemical parameters, renal histology, immunohistochemistry and semi-quantitative gene expression studies.

Results. Treatment with rapamycin significantly decreased albuminuria, improved survival, diminished splenomegaly, preserved renal function and reduced serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels. Kidney sections from saline-treated mice revealed marked mesangial proliferation, tubular dilation with intra-tubular protein cast deposition and leukocytic infiltration of the interstitium. The rapamycin-treated mice, in contrast, had relatively mild histological changes in their kidneys. Rapamycin treatment also significantly reduced the amount of immune complex deposition in the glomeruli, suppressed the interstitial infiltration by T-cells, B-cells and macrophages as well as down-regulated the intra-renal expression of RANTES.

Conclusions. We conclude that rapamycin is effective in attenuating the severity of established nephritis in NZB/W F1 mice. The beneficial effects of rapamycin are mediated, at least in part, through inhibition of lymphoproliferation, reduced RANTES expression and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration in the kidneys. Rapamycin could be of therapeutic value in the treatment of human lupus nephritis.

Keywords: autoimmunity; lupus nephritis; NZB/W F1 mice; rapamycin



   Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a relatively common systemic autoimmune disease which predominantly affects young female individuals [1,2]. Renal involvement or lupus nephritis is one of the most important complications of SLE and might lead to the development of acute or chronic renal failure [3]. Patients with lupus nephritis are usually being treated with immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and more recently mycophenolate mofetil [4,5]. A certain proportion of patients with severe lupus nephritis, however, might fail to respond to the immunosuppressive therapies currently available. Moreover, some patients might not be able to tolerate the immunosuppressive drugs because of their side effects. It is therefore still necessary to develop newer agents to supplement our armamentarium for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Rapamycin is a macrolide antibiotic with potent immunosuppressive properties [6]. It acts by inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key protein kinase necessary for cell cycle progression, thereby suppressing the proliferation and clonal expansion of interleukin-2-stimulated T lymphocytes [7]. At present, the main clinical application of rapamycin is for the prevention of acute rejection in solid organ transplant recipients [8].

The New Zealand Black/White F1 (NZB/W F1) mouse is a commonly used experimental model of SLE. This strain of mouse spontaneously develops an autoimmune disease at the age of 5–6 months, which is characterized by splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, autoantibody production and immune-complex-mediated glomerulonephritis [9,10]. Death as a result of renal failure usually occurs by the age of 10–12 months.

By virtue of its immunosuppressive properties, rapamycin might be useful in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Rapamycin has been shown to be effective in preventing the development of nephritis in the lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice [11] and the NZB/W F1 mice [12]. However, the therapeutic effect of rapamycin on established nephritis in these murine lupus models has not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of rapamycin treatment on the severity of established glomerulonephritis in the NZB/W F1 mice.



   Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice
Female NZB/W F1 mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The mice were maintained at the Laboratory Animal Unit of the University of Hong Kong under standard conditions with a 12-h light and dark cycle and were allowed access to water and chow ad libitum. All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the Committee on the Use of Live Animals for Teaching and Research of the University of Hong Kong.

Drug
Oral liquid formulation of rapamycin (1 mg/mL) was supplied by Wyeth Hong Kong Ltd (Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China).

Experimental design
Six-month-old female NZB/W F1 mice (N = 38) were divided into two groups. One group was treated with rapamycin (3 mg/kg body weight) once daily by oral gavage (N = 17). The other group received equal volume of normal saline on the same schedule and served as the treatment control (N = 21). Both groups of mice had evidence of active nephritis (urine albumin excretion >100 mg/dL) at the commencement of drug treatment. The mice were treated for 4 months (i.e. till 10 month of age). Urinary albumin excretion was determined at baseline and then monthly thereafter. At the time of killing, blood was collected for the measurement of serum urea, creatinine and anti-dsDNA antibody levels. The kidneys were harvested for histological, immunohistochemical and semi-quantitative gene expression studies. The spleen was dissected out for the measurement of spleen weight and for the determination of total splenocyte count.

Albuminuria
Spot urine samples were collected from each mouse by urinary bladder massage at baseline and then once every month after the initiation of drug treatment. Urinary albumin levels were measured by a commercially available ELISA kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction.

Renal function and anti-dsDNA antibody measurements
Blood was collected from the mice by cardiac puncture under anaesthesia at the time of killing. Serum urea and creatinine levels were measured by the modified Jaffe's method using a Beckman CX-5 analyser (Beckman Instruments Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Serum levels of anti-dsDNA (IgG) antibody were determined by a commercially available ELISA kit (Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, USA) with reference to the manufacturer's instruction.

Total splenocyte count
Single cell suspension from spleen was prepared by mashing the whole spleen and straining the resulting suspension through a nylon wool sieve. The cells were then centrifuged at 400g for 5 min. The pelleted cells were resuspended in a Lysis Buffer to lyse the red blood cells. After washing with PBS, the total number of splenocytes per spleen was counted using a haematocytometer.

Renal histology and immunofluorescence studies
At the time of killing, kidney specimens obtained were fixed in 10% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometre sections were prepared and then stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The kidney sections were coded and examined by two independent observers (SLL and KWC) who were blinded to the treatment groups. The histological changes for mesangial proliferation, tubular dilation, protein cast deposition inside the tubules and inflammatory cell infiltration into the interstitium were assessed in a semi-quantitative manner by a scoring system of 0–3+, where 0 = no change; 1+ = mild; 2+ = moderate and 3+ = severe. At least 50 glomeruli were examined for each sample.

For immunofluorescence studies, kidney specimens were snap-frozen in 22-oxycalcitriol (OCT) compound. Five-micrometre cryostat sections of the kidneys were prepared and then stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA) or FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse C3 antibodies (Sigma). The amount of immune complex deposition in the glomeruli was scored semi-quantitatively by an investigator (SLL) who was blinded to the treatment groups, according to the intensity of the fluorescence on a scale of 0–3+ where 0 = absent, 1+ = mild, 2+ = moderate and 3+ = strong staining. At least 20 glomeruli were examined per microscopic slide.

Immunohistochemical staining
The expression of regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) within the kidney was detected by immunohistochemical staining. Formalin-fixed kidney tissue sections were deparaffinized and then incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in 100% methanol for 10 min to block the endogenous peroxidase. The sections were incubated with biotin-labelled rat anti-mouse RANTES antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. The sections were then incubated with a corresponding secondary antibody at 37°C for 1 h. The expression of RANTES was visualized by the DAKO EnVision System (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). The sections were counter-stained with haematoxylin. In negative controls, the primary antibodies were omitted.

The nature of the infiltrating inflammatory cells in the kidneys was determined by immunofluorescence studies. Cryostat kidney sections were fixed in cold methanol/acetone for 10 min and then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin to minimize non-specific antibody binding. The sections were then incubated with antibodies against CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, B-cells (CD23) or macrophages (F4/80) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 60 min at 37°C. The sections were washed with PBS and then incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies for 60 min at 37°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were mounted and epifluorescence viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 135, Zeiss, Carl Zeiss, Hong Kong). The number of positive-staining CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, B-cells and macrophages in 20 non-overlapping high power fields (x400) within the kidney sections were counted and expressed as number of cells per high power field. The counting was performed by one of the investigators (SLL) using coded slides.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
A commercially available kit for total cellular RNA isolation, ToTALLY RNA (Ambion Inc., TX, USA), was used to extract total RNA from snap frozen kidney samples, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quality of the RNA was confirmed by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis of the 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA bands.

The equal amounts of total RNA (1 µg) from test and control samples were reversed transcribed into cDNA using Superscript RNase H reverse transcriptase and random hexamers as previously described (Yung et al, FASEB J, published online 18 May 2001 as doi: 10.1096/fj.00–0794fje). PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 20 µl containing 1 µl RT product and 19 µl master mix comprising 12.8 µl H2O, 0.5 µl 5' primer (20 µM), 0.5 µl 3' primer (20 µM), 1.6 µl dNTPs (2.5 mM), 2 µl 10 x PCR buffer, 1.4 µl MgCl2 (2 mM) and 0.2 µl Ampli-Taq Polymerase. The PCR amplification consisted of 2 min of denaturation at 94°C followed by 39 cycles consisting of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 60 s, 72°C for 90s and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Ten microlitre of each PCR primer mix was then electrophoresed on a flat-bed agarose gel (2%) and stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL). The density of the bands was evaluated by a ChemiGenius Gel Documentation System using ChemiGenius analysis software (Syngene, Gene Company, Hong Kong). The results were expressed as the ratio of RANTES to the house-keeping gene β-actin. The primer sequences used are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Sequences of the PCR primers and size of the amplicons

 
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Kaplan–Mayer curves and the log-rank test were used to compare the survival rates. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyse the statistical differences in other parameters between saline and rapamycin-treated mice. Inter-observer concordance rate was determined by the {kappa} test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.



   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Survival rate and splenomegaly
The survival rates of the saline and rapamycin-treated mice are shown in Figure 1. At the time of killing (i.e. at 10 months of age and after 4 months of treatment), all the mice in the rapamycin-treated group were alive while five mice in the saline-treated group had died (survival rate: 100% versus 77%, P = 0.001).


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Survival rate of NZB/W F1 mice treated with rapamycin or saline for 4 months, starting from 6 months of age. At the time of killing, all the mice in the rapamycin-treated group were alive whereas 23% of the mice in the saline-treated group had died (P = 0.001).

 
Massive splenomegaly is a hallmark feature of the NZB/W F1 mice and reflects underlying uncontrolled lymphoproliferation. Marked splenomegaly was observed in the saline-treated mice. Rapamycin treatment significantly reduced the size of the spleen. The mean weight of the spleen in the rapamycin-treated mice was less than half that of the saline-treated mice (Figure 2). In addition, the total splenocyte count per spleen of the rapamycin-treated mice was significantly lower than that of the saline-treated mice (Figure 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Spleen weight of NZB/W F1 mice treated with rapamycin or saline at the time of killing. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 Total Splenocyte count per spleen of NZB/W F1 mice treated with rapamycin or saline at the time ofkilling. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

 
Albuminuria
The effect of rapamycin treatment on the severity of albuminuria is shown in Figure 4. At the commencement of drug treatment and when the mice were around 6 months of age, both the saline and the rapamycin-treated mice had already developed significant albuminuria (urine albumin >100 mg/dL). The amount of albuminuria increased progressively with time in the saline-treated mice. In contrast, the degree of albuminuria in the rapamycin-treated mice remained relatively stable. From the second month after the commencement of drug treatment onwards, the amount of albuminuria was significantly lower in the rapamycin-treated mice than in the saline-treated mice.


Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 Serial changes in the amount of albuminuria in NZB/W F1 mice treated with rapamycin or saline.

 
Renal function
The NZB/W F1 mice typically develop progressive deterioration in renal function after the onset of nephritis. At 10 months of age, the serum creatinine and urea levels of the rapamycin-treated mice were significantly lower than those of the saline-treated mice (17.28 ± 3.90 µmol/L versus 30.00 ± 8.10 µmol/L for serum creatinine, P = 0.020; and 6.61 ± 1.38 mmol/L versus 12.44 ± 5.36 mmol/L for serum urea, P = 0.021).

Serum anti-dsDNA levels
Saline-treated mice had very high levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies in the serum. The antibody levels were markedly suppressed in mice treated with rapamycin (620 ± 915 µg/ mL versus 71 ± 132 µg/mL, P = 0.021).

Renal histology and immune deposition
Kidney sections from the saline-treated mice showed marked mesangial cell proliferation, tubular dilation, tubular protein cast deposition and leukocytic infiltration of the interstitial areas. These histological changes were markedly reduced in the rapamycin-treated mice (Figure 5 and Table 2).


Figure 5
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 Histopathological changes in the kidneys of NZB/W F1 mice treated with either rapamycin or saline. (A) Low power view of the kidney section of a rapamycin-treated mouse showing relatively normal renal histology. (B) Low power view of the kidney section of a saline-treated mouse showing grossly abnormal renal architecture. (C, E and G) High power view showing normal looking glomerulus, interstitium and renal tubules respectively in a rapamycin-treated mouse. (D, F and H) High power view showing marked mesangial proliferation, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration (arrow) and tubular dilation with intra-tubular protein cast deposition (*) respectively in a saline-treated mouse. (magnification: A and B x100; C to H x400, haematoxylin and eosin stain.)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Effect of rapamycin treatment on the histological manifestations of glomerulonephritis in NZB/W F1 micea

 
Indirect immunofluorescence studies revealed intense staining for both IgG and C3 in the glomeruli of the saline-treated mice while only weak glomerular staining for IgG and C3 was observed in the rapamycin-treated mice (Figure 6 and Table 3).


Figure 6
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 Indirect immunofluorescence staining for immune complex deposition in the glomeruli of NZB/W F1 mice after 4 months of treatment with either saline or rapamycin. (A) IgG deposition in a rapamycin-treated mouse; (B) IgG deposition in a saline-treated mouse; (C) C3 deposition in a rapamycin-treated mouse; (D) C3 deposition in a saline-treated mouse. (magnification x400)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Effect of rapamycin treatment on glomerular immune deposition in NZB/W F1 micea with established nephritis

 
Infiltration of inflammatory cells into the kidneys
The number and composition of mononuclear cell infiltration in the kidney sections of saline- or rapamycin-treated mice were determined by immunofluorescence using monoclonal antibodies against B lymphocytes, CD4+ T lymphocytes, CD8+ T lymphocytes and macrophages. There were numerous B lymphocytes, CD4+ T lymphocytes, CD8+ T lymphocytes and macrophages infiltrating in the periglomerular, perivascular and interstitial areas of the saline-treated mice. The number of infiltrating cells was significantly reduced in the rapamycin-treated mice (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Effect of rapamycin treatment on inflammatory cell infiltration in the kidney of NZB/W F1 mice with established nephritis

 
RANTES mRNA and protein expression in the kidney
A number of recent studies have demonstrated that RANTES plays an important role in the pathogenesis of SLE [13,14]. To investigate whether rapamycin could modulate the intra-renal expression of RANTES in lupus nephritis, we examined the effect of rapamycin on RANTES protein and gene expression by immunohistochemical staining and RT-PCR, respectively. Increased immunostaining for RANTES, particularly in the glomeruli, was observed in the saline-treated mice. Moreover, the protein cast within the dilated renal tubules also showed positive immunostaining for RANTES. In contrast, the immunostaining for RANTES in the kidney sections of the rapamycin-treated mice was markedly diminished (Figure 7). Rapamycin treatment also significantly reduced the intra-renal expression of RANTES mRNA as compared to saline treatment (Figure 8).


Figure 7
View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 Intra-renal expression of RANTES in NZB/W F1 mice treated with either saline or rapamycin by immunohistochemical staining. Sections shown are from rapamycin-treated (A and C) and saline-treated mice mice (B and D) at the time of killing (magnification x100 A & B; x400 C & D).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8 RANTES mRNA expression in the kidneys of NZB/W F1 mice by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The amount of RANTES mRNA present in the kidney tissue was expressed as the ratio of RANTES to β-actin. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 6 in each treatment group).

 


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of our study indicate that treating 6-month-old female NZB/W F1 mice with rapamycin for 4 months, reduced albuminuria, improved survival, diminished splenomegaly, preserved renal function, lowered anti-dsDNA antibody levels, attenuated the histological severity of nephritis, decreased immune complex deposition in the glomeruli and inflammatory cell infiltration into the interstitium as well as down-regulated the intra-renal expression of RANTES. Our data thus show that rapamycin can attenuate the severity of established nephritis in the NZB/W F1 mice.

Two previous studies utilizing the MRL/lpr mice and the NZB/W F1 mice respectively have shown that rapamycin, when started before the onset of active nephritis, is effective in preventing the subsequent development of lupus nephritis [11,12]. While the preventive approach adopted by these two studies is instrumental in proving the therapeutic potential of rapamycin, it might be more relevant clinically to evaluate the therapeutic effects of rapamycin in lupus mice with established nephritis. The findings of our study, in which rapamycin treatment was initiated in NZB/W F1 mice with clinical evidence of active nephritis, bore closer resemblance to the actual clinical situation in human and confirmed the therapeutic value of rapamycin in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Our findings are in line with another recently published study in which it was shown that rapamycin treatment at 1 mg/kg/day in 5-month-old NZB/W F1 mice for 4 months reduced proteinuria and ameliorated the histological lesions of lupus nephritis [15].

Uncontrolled lymphoproliferation is a characteristic pathological feature of the NZB/W F1 mice, and is responsible for the development of massive splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, excessive production of auto-antibodies and immune-mediated tissue injury [9,10]. Our observations that the degree of splenomegaly and the total splenocyte count were markedly reduced in the rapamycin-treated mice suggest that the beneficial effects of rapamycin on lupus nephritis in the NZB/W F1 mice are probably mediated through suppression of lymphoproliferation. This postulation is consistent with the known mechanism of the action of rapamycin, which is the suppression of the proliferation of interleukin-2-stimulated-T lymphocytes via inhibition of mTOR [7]. The markedly reduced serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels and intra-renal immune complex deposition in the rapamycin-treated mice are probably a consequence of the suppressed lymphoproliferation.

The beneficial effects of rapamycin in lupus nephritis might also be mediated through modulation of the intra-renal expression of RANTES. Chemokines and chemokine receptors play an important role in the pathogenesis of many forms of kidney diseases [16,17]. Antagonists of chemokines and chemokine receptors have been shown to be of therapeutic potential in experimental models of lupus nephritis [18]. RANTES is a pro-inflammatory CC-chemokine that mediates the recruitment of leukocytes to sites of inflammation and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Up-regulation of RANTES has been demonstrated prior to the development of renal injury in MRL/lpr mice [13,19]. MRL/lpr mice that were deficient in RANTES have marked reduction in lymphadenopathy [14]. In addition, increased serum [20] and urinary [21] levels of RANTES have been shown to correlate with disease activity in lupus patients. Given the important role played by RANTES in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, our finding that rapamycin significantly reduced the intra-renal expression of RANTES has important clinical implications and suggests that the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on RANTES expression might represent another mechanism by which rapmycin attenuates lupus nephritis. The substantial reduction in the number of inflammatory cells infiltrating into the kidneys could be attributed to the suppression of RANTES expression by rapamycin.

The results of our study, as well as those of others utilizing animal models of membranous nephropathy [22], mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis [23] and reduced renal mass [24], have indicated that rapamycin is beneficial in proteinuric nephritis. The safety of using rapamycin in clinical practice to treat patients with proteinuric nephropathy, however, is more controversial. There are recent reports in renal transplant recipients suggesting that withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor and conversion to rapamycin led to the development of proteinuria [25,26]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that all the patients in these reports have pre-existing chronic allograft dysfunction. It has been argued that the onset of proteinuria in these patients could be related to the glomerular haemodynamic changes following calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal rather than the introduction of rapamycin [27]. It is noteworthy that rapamycin-associated proteinuria has not been reported in renal transplant patients who were given de novo rapamycin without calcineurin inhibitor [28] or following early elimination of calcineurin inhibitor [29]. Clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of rapamycin in the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have also generated conflicting results. In one study in which 21 patients with steroid resistant idiopathic FSGS were treated with rapamycin, ~60% of the subjects were able to achieve complete or partial remission [30]. In another study, in contrast, it was found that in patients with idiopathic FSGC who had prolonged disease duration and prior cyclosporine exposure, rapamycin treatment was associated with deterioration in renal function and worsening of proteinuria [31]. It is apparent that our current understanding on the clinical significance and causative mechanism of rapamycin-associated proteinuria in patients with renal transplant or chronic nephritis is far from complete. The effect of rapamycin on proteinuria is probably influenced by multiple factors such as the presence of pre-existing renal damage, timing of administration, dosage of rapamycin used and prior exposure to calcineurin inhibitor. Additional basic and clinical studies are warranted to clarify the issue of rapamycin-associated proteinuria.

In conclusion, the results from our studies show that rapamycin is effective in attenuating the severity of established nephritis in the NZB/W F1 mouse. The beneficial effects of rapamycin are mediated, in part, through suppression of lypmphoproliferation, inhibition of intra-renal expression of RANTES and reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration. The potential role of rapamycin in the treatment of human lupus nephritis warrants further investigation.



   Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by research grants from the RGC Competitive Earmarked Research Grant (HKU 7550/06M), the Hong Kong Society of Nephrology and the Wai Hung Charity Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement. The donors had no role in the study design and execution, data analysis and interpretation or writing of the report. We declare that the results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract form.



   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. D’Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet (2007) 369:587–596.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Feng PH. Systemic lupus erythematosus: the face of Asia. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2007) 1108:114–120.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Dooley MA. Clinical and laboratory features of lupus nephritis. In: Dubois’ Lupus Erythematosus—Wallace DJ, Hahn BH, eds. (2007) Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 1112–1130.
  4. Davidson A, Aranow C. Pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol (2006) 18:468–475.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Waldman M, Appel GB. Update on the treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int (2006) 70:1403–1412.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Kahan BD. Sirolimus: a comprehensive review. Expert Opin Pharmacother (2001) 2:1903–1917.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Sehgal SN. Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression. Clin Biochem (1998) 31:335–340.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Augustine JJ, Bodziak KA, Hricik DE. Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation. Drugs (2007) 67:369–391.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Howie JB, Helyer BJ. The immunology and pathology of NZB mice. Adv Immunol (1968) 9:215–266.[Medline]
  10. Hahn BH, Singh RR. Animal models of systemic lupus erythematosus. In: Dubois’ Lupus Erythematosus—Wallace DJ, Hahn BH, eds. (2007) Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 299–355.
  11. Warner LM, Adams LM, Sehgal SN. Rapamycin prolongs survival and arrests pathophysiologic changes in murine systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum (1994) 37:289–297.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Ramos-Barron A, Pinera-Haces C, Gomez-Alamillo C, et al. Prevention of murine lupus disease in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice by sirolimus treatment. Lupus (2007) 16:775–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Moore KJ, Wada T, Barbee SD, et al. Gene transfer of RANTES elicits autoimmune renal injury in MRL-Fas(1pr) mice. Kidney Int (1998) 53:1631–1641.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Tsukahara T, Makino Y, Fujii T, et al. Role of RANTES in the development of autoimmune tissue injuries in MRL-Fas lpr mice. Clin Immunol (2002) 103:89–97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Alperovich G, Rama I, Lloberas N, et al. New immunosuppresor strategies in the treatment of murine lupus nephritis. Lupus (2007) 16:18–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Segerer S, Nelson PJ, Schlondorff D. Chemokines, chemokine receptors, and renal disease: from basic science to pathophysiologic and therapeutic studies. J Am Soc Nephrol (2000) 11:152–176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Anders HJ, Vielhauer V, Schlondorff D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors are involved in the resolution or progression of renal disease. Kidney Int (2003) 63:401–415.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Vielhauer V, Anders HJ, Schlondorff D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors as therapeutic targets in lupus nephritis. Semin Nephrol (2007) 27:81–97.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Perez de Lema G, Maier H, Nieto E, et al. Chemokine expression precedes inflammatory cell infiltration and chemokine receptor and cytokine expression during the initiation of murine lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol (2001) 12:1369–1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Vila LM, Molina MJ, Mayor AM, et al. Association of serum MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES with clinical manifestations, disease activity, and damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol (2007) 26:718–722.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Rovin BH, Song H, Birmingham DJ, et al. Urine chemokines as biomarkers of human systemic lupus erythematosus activity. J Am Soc Nephrol (2005) 16:467–473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Naumovic R, Jovovic D, Basta-Jovanovic G, et al. Effects of rapamycin on active Heymann nephritis. Am J Nephrol (2007) 27:379–389.[Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Kramer S, Wang-Rosenke Y, Scholl V, et al. Low-dose mTOR inhibition by rapamycin attenuates progression in anti-thy1-induced chronic glomerulosclerosis of the rat. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2008) 294:F440–F449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Diekmann F, Rovira J, Carreras J, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition halts the progression of proteinuria in a rat model of reduced renal mass. J Am Soc Nephrol (2007) 18:2653–2660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bumbea V, Kamar N, Ribes D, et al. Long-term results in renal transplant patients with allograft dysfunction after switching from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2005) 20:2517–2523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Saurina A, Campistol JM, Piera C, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in chronic allograft dysfunction: changes in glomerular haemodynamics and proteinuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2006) 21:488–493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rangan GK. Sirolimus-associated proteinuria and renal dysfunction. Drug Saf (2006) 29:1153–1161.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Larson TS, Dean PG, Stegall MD, et al. Complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: a randomized trial comparing sirolimus and tacrolimus. Am J Transplant (2006) 6:514–522.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Russ G, Segoloni G, Oberbauer R, et al. Superior outcomes in renal transplantation after early cyclosporine withdrawal and sirolimus maintenance therapy, regardless of baseline renal function. Transplantation (2005) 80:1204–1211.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Tumlin JA, Miller D, Near M, et al. A prospective, open-label trial of sirolimus in the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2006) 1:109–116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cho ME, Hurley JK, Kopp JB. Sirolimus therapy of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is associated with nephrotoxicity. Am J Kidney Dis (2007) 49:310–317.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received for publication: 14.12.07
Accepted in revised form: 26. 3.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2768    most recent
gfn216v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lui, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lui, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?