Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on April 18, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn204
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2777    most recent
gfn204v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Inhibition of mineralocorticoid receptors with eplerenone alleviates short-term cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity in conscious rats

Finn Thomsen Nielsen1,2, Boye L. Jensen1, Niels Marcussen3, Ole Skøtt1 and Peter Bie1

1 Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark 2 Department of Nephrology, Odense University Hospital 3 Institute of Pathology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Finn Thomsen Nielsen, Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 21, 3, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark. Tel: +45-2443-4346; Fax: +45-6541-3452; E-mail: ftn{at}dadlnet.dk



   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background. Recent data indicate that aldosterone aggravates cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced nephrotoxicity. We examined whether the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blocker eplerenone (EPL) antagonized early deterioration of renal function and blood pressure (BP) increase in CsA-treated rats.

Methods. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received CsA (15 mg/kg/day i.p.) and/or EPL (100 mg/kg/day p.o.) for 21 days. After 2 weeks, arterial, venous and urinary bladder catheters were implanted and the rats were trained to accept a restraining device allowing arterial blood sampling and direct measurement of BP and renal function. BP was measured on-line in conscious rats.

Results. CsA significantly increased systolic BP: 139 ± 4 versus 134 ± 2 mmHg, reduced body weight gain: –5 ± 6 versus 36 ± 7 g, glomerular filtration rate (GFR): 1.02 ± 0.16 versus 2.64 ± 0.27 ml/min, renal blood flow (RBF): 5.3 ± 2.4 versus 13.5 ± 2.1 ml/min and lithium clearance (CLi+): 0.16 ± 0.04 versus 0.26 ± 0.07 ml/min compared to controls. These changes were prevented by simultaneous EPL treatment: systolic BP, 130 ± 4 mmHg; weight gain, 53 ± 7 g; GFR, 1.67 ± 0.26 ml/min; RBF, 12.3 ± 2.1 ml/min and CLi+, 0.27 ± 0.03 ml/min. Analysis of kidney morphology after the CsA treatment showed hyaline vacuolization in tubules and vascular depositions in arterioles; these changes were less pronounced after combination therapy. No significant changes were seen regarding haemoglobin, haematocrit, plasma renin and vasopressin, plasma and urinary sodium, potassium, or osmolality.

Conclusions. MR blockade by EPL prevented short-term alterations in GFR, RBF and hypertension associated with CsA nephrotoxicity. We conclude that the aldosterone-MR pathway contributes markedly to the renal toxicity induced by this calcineurin inhibitor.

Keywords: cyclosporin A; eplerenone; glomerular filtration rate; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; nephrotoxicity



   Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), cyclosporin A (CsA), is a potent macrolide immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative agent, which is widely used after organ transplantation and for the treatment of various immunological diseases. CsA exerts major nephrotoxic effects. This nephrotoxicity seems to involve an acute vasoconstriction related to afferent glomerular arterioles, but also a major pro-fibrotic effect in the chronic phase [1]. Many treatment options have been examined for the purpose of countering these adverse effects, but until recently none have managed to arrest the gradual decline in renal function and the progressive renal fibrosis occurring during the CsA treatment. However, recently there have been indications that a mineralocorticoid blockade might have a preventive effect [2–5]. In these studies the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone slowed the progression of renal dysfunction and reduced the morphological changes seen after the CsA treatment; the studies were conducted in anaesthetized animals after major surgery, which might alter blood pressure (BP) and parameters of renal function.

The present study was undertaken to investigate further the hypothesis that CsA nephrotoxicity might be prevented by mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) inhibition. We used the more selective aldosterone antagonist eplerenone (EPL), which has a clinically superior profile with respect to adverse effects [6]. All measurements were taken in conscious, trained rats under steady-state conditions. This model allows direct recordings of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal blood flow (RBF), segmental reabsorption by clearance techniques and BP. The plasma concentrations of renin, aldosterone and vasopressin were also determined and morphological analysis of in vivo perfused kidneys stained with HE and PAS was done. The CsA dose was chosen on the basis of the results of earlier dose-response studies, so that the immunosuppressive effect in this particular rat strain was fully exploited [7]. A treatment period of 21 days was used to study short-term effects.



   Subjects and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All procedures conformed to Danish national guidelines for the care and handling of animals and the published guidelines from the National Institute of Health. The Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate approved the study (2005/561-967).

Experimental animals
The animals were inbred, male Sprague-Dawley rats (Mol:SPRD) from Harlan Scandinavia (Harlan, Alleroed, Denmark) initially weighing 180–220 g. The rats had free access to tap water and a wet mash non-sodium-depleted diet (Altromin® Standard 1320, Lage, Germany).

Drug preparation and treatment protocol
The rats were treated with CsA (n = 7), EPL (n = 7), both (n = 9) or neither, thus serving as controls treated with the vehicle only (n = 7) for 21 days before the renal function tests were performed. The CsA infusion substance (Sandimmune Neoral®, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) 100 mg/ml was diluted with sterile saline to a concentration of 10 mg/ml. All rats received intraperitoneal injections of saline, rats in the CsA and CsA + EPL treatment groups had CsA added and rats in all groups were given equal volumes as the dose was adjusted in step with the weight increase of the individual rat. Accordingly, control rats and rats treated with EPL alone were given similar amounts of saline without CsA. The intraperitoneal route was chosen to ensure a precise dose. EPL tablets 50 mg (Inspra®, Pharmacia Ltd, Northumberland, UK) were crushed and added to the diet for the EPL treatment groups: 1.2 mg/g dry food, approaching a daily dose of 100 mg/kg body weight for the individual rat [8]. The non-EPL treatment groups received a similar diet without EPL. Two days before the renal function tests, lithium chloride 10 mmol/kg dry weight of food was added.

Catheters in artery, vein, and urinary bladder
One week before the renal function tests the rats were anaesthetized with 3 ml/kg body weight of a combination of fentanyl 80 µg/ml, fluanisone 2.5 mg/ml (Hypnorm®, VetaPharma, Sherburn-in-Elmet, Leeds, UK) and midazolam (Dormicum®, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) 1.25 mg/ml administered intraperitoneally and N2O/O2 50%. For analgesia 0.5 ml buprenorphine (Temgesic®, Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) 0.3 mg/ml was administered subcutaneously. A catheter was inserted into the femoral vein and another in the femoral artery. Both catheters were closed with heparin 200 IU/ml and chymotrypsin (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA) 225 IU/ml added to glucose 50% and subcutaneously tunnelled to exit at the back of the head. The bladder was catheterized through a suprapubic incision with a specially designed stainless steel catheter that was sutured to the abdominal wall and kept closed until the day of the renal function tests. After the operation the rats were placed in a recovery cage at a temperature of 27–30°C. The animals received buprenorphine 2 ml/kg of body weight subcutaneously after the operation and on the following day. On Days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 the artery and vein catheters were rinsed with the heparin/glucose solution.

Blood pressure measurements and clearance studies
Beginning 2 days after surgery, the rats were trained for another 5 days to sit awake and relaxed in a restraining device for clearance and BP measurements. The arterial catheter was connected to a BP transducer linked to an amplifier (BLPR and BP1, World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK) and computer running custom-designed software (LabVIEW Real-Time®, version 7 Express, National InstrumentsTM, Dublin, Ireland) for continuous recording of BP and heart rate. The venous catheter was connected to two syringes of an infusion pump, one delivering inulin (Polyfructosan S, Laevosan®, Petrone Group, Napoli, Italy) 25% in saline: a priming dose of 80 µl/kg/min over 2 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 8 µl/kg/min, and the other delivering para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) 20% in saline: a priming dose of 120 µl/kg/min over 2 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 12 µl/kg/min. One hour was allowed for reaching the steady state. Thereafter the urine was collected for the next 60 min; at the end of this period blood samples were taken from the arterial catheter for clearance determinations. Blood samples were centrifuged and plasma was collected and stored at –80o C.

Analysis
The CsA treatment was checked after 21 days of treatment by measuring the whole blood CsA concentrations as trough levels with a monoclonal radioimmunoassay kit (TDx/TDxFLx, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA). The blood samples were collected 22–26 h after the last administration of CsA.

Inulin in plasma and urine was analysed by the diphenylamine method [9] modified for microanalysis. By this technique, inulinase hydrolyses inulin to fructose, which is converted to sorbitol by sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) with the consumption of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). The amount of NADH used is proportional to the amount of inulin originally present in the sample, and NADH is detected by spectrophotometry at 340 nm (Versamax® Micro plate reader, Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). PAH in plasma and urine was measured by a colorimetric reaction with the dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DACA) solution in an acidic environment [9]. The intensity of the colour generated was measured at 545 nm after 15–30 min of incubation.

The concentrations of lithium, sodium and potassium ions in plasma and urine were determined by flame photometry (ILS 943, Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA). The concentration of creatinine in urine was measured by photometric analysis (Microlab 300, Vital Scientific, Spankeren, The Netherlands). Osmolality in plasma and urine was measured immediately after centrifugation by freezing point depression (Osmomat® 030-D, Gonotec GmbH, Berlin, Germany), and haemoglobin and haematocrit were measured by an autoanalyser (Celltac{alpha} MEK-6108K, Nihon Kohden, Japan).

Renin in plasma was measured by the antibody-trapping method of Poulsen and Jorgensen [10]. Aldosterone in plasma was measured by a commercial radioimmunoassay kit (Coat-A-Count® Aldosterone, Diagnostic Products Corporation®, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The immunoreactivity of vasopressin in plasma was measured using antibody AB3096 after extraction as described by Emmeluth and Bie [11].

Renal clearances
Standard formulae were used to calculate clearance. Inulin clearance was taken as a measure of the GFR and lithium clearance (CLi) was taken as a measure of the delivery of proximal tubular fluid from the end of the pars recta into the thin descending limb of Henle [12]. Absolute proximal reabsorption (APR) rate was estimated as APR = GFR – CLi. Fractional proximal reabsorption (PFR) was calculated as PFR = APR/GFR and expressed as a percentage of the GFR. The PAH clearance was taken as a measure of the renal plasma flow (RPF), calculated according to the haematocrit as RBF.

Morphology
The rats were anaesthetized and the kidneys were fixed by formaldehyde infusion and embedded in paraffin. Kidney sections (3 µm) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, PAS and Trichrome Masson-Goldner before blind examination by light microscopy. The following histological parameters were graded and scored with a semi-quantitative scale between 0 and 3: glomerular injury, arterial injury, interstitial fibrosis, tubular dilation, protein casts and inflammatory cell infiltrates.

Statistics
The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied for comparison of data collected from more than two groups and when a significant difference was found group-to-group comparisons were done with the Mann–Whitney test. The P value given is for a two-tailed test, and a P value <5% was considered statistically significant.



   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There were no statistically significant differences in the CsA trough concentrations of the CsA treatment groups (3377 ± 562 ng/ml), as compared to the combination therapy group (2017 ± 416 ng/ml). Over the 21 days of treatment the body weight of the control rats increased significantly more than that of the rats in the CsA group (P <0.002) (Table 1). CsA decreased GFR, proximal fluid delivery and APR (Figure 1). In parallel, CsA reduced RBF (P <0.05) (Figure 2), and the urine creatinine concentration was significantly lower in the CsA-only treated animals, as compared to the controls (P <0.05) (Table 2). Interestingly, the body weight of the rats in the combination treatment group increased at a rate similar to that of the control rats (Table 1). Addition of EPL to the CsA treatment reversed all the parameters mentioned to normal or above normal; RBF increased 2.3-fold (Figure 2), whereas the EPL treatment alone did not change these values, as compared to the vehicle-treated control rats (Figure 2). The CsA treatment resulted in significant higher systolic BP compared to controls (P <0.05) while the changes in diastolic BP and mean arterial BP were not significantly different (Table 1). Neither the systolic BP, the diastolic BP nor the mean arterial BP were significantly different when the combination treatment group was compared to the control group (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Body weight increase and blood pressure after 21 days of treatment

 

Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 Renal function after 21 days of treatment. Inulin clearance as a measure of the glomerular filtration rate, lithium clearance as a measure of the end proximal fluid delivery and the difference between these as the absolute proximal reabsorption. CsA: cyclosporin A; EPL: eplerenone. *P <0.05 when compared to the control group; #P <0.05 when compared to the CsA treatment group, but not different from the control group.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 Renal blood flow as measured by para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) clearance after 21 days of treatment. CsA: cyclosporin A; EPL: eplerenone. *P <0.05 when compared to the control group; #P <0.05 when compared to the CsA treatment group, but not different from the control group.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Measurements of blood and urine samples after 21 days of treatment

 
Compared to that of the controls, plasma renin, plasma vasopressin, plasma and urinary osmolality, plasma potassium, plasma sodium and urinary potassium did not change during the CsA treatment (Table 2). Haemoglobin was significantly lower in the CsA group (8.2 mmol/l) than in the controls (9.0 mmol/l) (P <0.05) (Table 2). This effect was not reversed by the EPL treatment, as the CsA + EPL group showed similar anaemia (haemoglobin 8.2 mmol/l). The EPL alone and the control groups had similar haemoglobin levels: 9.1 mmol/l, and a similar pattern was seen for haematocrit (Table 2). Plasma aldosterone was significantly higher in the EPL-treated groups than in the control and the CsA-only treatment groups (P <0.05) (Table 2).

The paraffin-embedded, perfusion-fixed kidneys were subsequently stained with haematoxylin and eosin, PAS and Trichrome Masson-Goldner, and were analysed by light microscopy. Hyalin vacuolization in tubules and vascular deposition in arterioles mainly located at the basis of the glomeruli were seen in 70% of the animals treated with CsA (Figure 3). These semi-quantitatively scored findings were significantly different between groups (P <0.05, Mann–Whitney), that is less-pronounced findings were found in the CsA + EPL group [median score 0.5 (range 0–2), n = 7] compared to the CsA group [median score 1 (range 0–2), n = 7] (P <0.05, Kruskal–Wallis) and were not found at all in the control rats [median score 0 (range 0–1), n = 5] (P <0.05 when compared to the CsA group; NS when compared to the CsA + EPL group, Kruskal–Wallis’ test). Overt fibrosis was not apparent in any kidneys.


Figure 3
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 (A) CsA treated animal with arteriolar hyalinosis (arrow), (B) CsA + EPL treated animal with normal arteriole (arrow), PAS x300.

 


   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We show in conscious rats that a specific MR antagonist significantly and markedly improves the GFR and RBF in a model of chronic CsA nephrotoxicity. Numerous clinical and experimental studies report a significant nephrotoxic effect produced by the CNI treatment. This nephrotoxicity seems to have two elements. First, a reduction in GFR and CLi together with increases in PFR and BP are thought to be mediated by afferent glomerular vasoconstriction [1,13]. Second, a long-term fibrogenic effect occurs and this seems to be independent of the vascular effect [1,7,13,14]. Clinically, the progressive toxicity is a major problem resulting in gradual deterioration in the renal function of patients receiving CNI. Although the acute and short-term effects can be prevented to some degree, e.g., by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors [2], calcium channel antagonists [15] or angiotensin II receptor blockade [16], these treatments do not improve the long-term clinical outcome. Recently, preventive effects on both the acute toxicity and the fibrogenic effect of the CsA treatment were indicated in studies combining the CsA treatment with the MR antagonist, spironolactone [2–5]. These observations agree with other reports that aldosterone blockade exerts reno-protective effects in states with chronic renal injury [17].

We explored the hypothesis of MR blockade as a reno-protective measure in a conscious rat model of CsA nephrotoxicity. We used the Sprague-Dawley strain in order to directly compare our results with earlier CNI nephrotoxicity studies [1,7,13,14] and used a relatively short-term high-dose protocol of 21 days to study primarily functional changes and not structural and inflammatory secondary changes [1,7]. The intraperitoneal route was used to ensure that the individual rat received a precise dose. Measurement of whole blood CsA concentrations confirmed the presence of similar concentrations in the various groups. EPL was given in a high dose to ensure the clinically significant effect earlier established in rats [8].

The CsA-treated rats had a smaller increase in body weight than the controls had (Table 1). This agrees with earlier findings for CsA [1,3,14] and tacrolimus [13] and was seen as an effect induced by uraemia and malnutrition arising from the nephrotoxicity rather than the specific substance. Administration of EPL prevented growth impairment (Figure 1). After the treatment, GFR, RBF, CLi and the calculated APR were reduced in the CsA-treated animals when compared to controls in concordance with numerous publications [1,7,14]. Interestingly, all of these parameters were preserved in animals in which the CsA treatment was combined with EPL. This indicates that both the vascular and the short-term tubular effects of CsA were prevented by the MR blockade (Figures 1 and 2). It should be emphasized that the effect of EPL was seen despite a very high dosage of CsA. In the clinical setting a much lower CsA dosage is used. BP measurements were taken continuously with intra-arterial catheters for 60-min periods and were performed 7 days after surgery to minimize postoperative pain and influence by analgesics or anaesthetic drugs. Although the catheters were regularly rinsed by an anticoagulation heparin/glucose solution, the observed small BP amplitudes might indicate a buffering of the signal through the catheter to the BP transducer. The BP was rather high in all the treatment groups and tended to stay at high levels during the observation period, perhaps because of the stress related to the restraining device, even though the animals were trained to tolerate this situation. The systolic BP in the CsA treatment group was significantly higher than in rats from the control group in concordance with earlier studies [7,14]. Interestingly, the group receiving combination therapy with CsA + EPL had a lower systolic BP when compared to the CsA treatment group but not different from controls or the EPL-alone-treated animals. Could the better preservation of renal function and morphology in the CsA + EPL group compared to the CsA-alone group be mediated by an antihypertensive effect of EPL? Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated that normalization of BP by antihypertensive regimens could not prevent deterioration of renal function during the CsA treatment [2,15,16]. Also, in this experiment the EPL-alone treatment group had a BP similar to the CsA-alone treatment group (Table 1) but despite this there was a significant better-preserved renal function after 21 days of treatment (Table 1, Figures 1 and 2). Thus, it is less likely that the anti-hypertensive effect of EPL caused the improvement in GFR and RBF.

Hyperkalaemia was not observed in any of the groups (Table 2), so it appears that the protective effect of EPL was solely mediated through its tubular effects. Plasma levels of aldosterone were high in both the EPL-treated groups (Table 2) probably as a compensatory response to MR blockade. We found no evidence of EPL having an interaction with the assay used to measure aldosterone, and we did not use a low-sodium diet, which in other CsA nephrotoxicity studies interfered with the aldosterone results. Plasma sodium, renin, vasopressin and plasma osmolality did not differ significantly between groups (Table 2) which suggests that extracellular volume has not changed markedly. The rather low vasopressin levels in all groups indicate that the rats were not exposed to a situation with major stress or pain.

Both haemoglobin and haematocrit were significantly lower in the CsA treatment groups, with and without EPL (Table 2), probably because reduced erythropoietin production was followed by a decreased stimulation of bone marrow erythropoiesis-–an effect that EPL was not able to prevent.

As expected, the morphological analysis revealed only minor changes, but in the tubular cells hyaline vacuolization was less pronounced in the CsA + EPL group than in the CsA group. Also, vascular depositions in the arterioles were found mainly located at the basis of the glomeruli to an extent which was more pronounced in the CsA group than in the CsA + EPL treatment group. Angiotensin II has been suggested to be responsible for up-regulation of fibrogenic pathways [18], but the observation that MR blockade protects against nephrotoxicity suggests, perhaps the mediato, that aldosterone is also involved [19].

Theoretically, the beneficial effect of EPL could be brought about by effects not related to aldosterone blockade, but since spironolactone was also shown to prevent CsA nephrotoxicity we suggest that it is the blockade of MRs that prevents the functional changes associated with CsA nephrotoxicity. Thus, mineralocorticoid antagonists might be helpful in reducing the renal toxicity induced by the CNI treatment.



   Acknowledgments
 
The study was supported by grants from the Helen and Ejnar Bjørnow Foundation, the NOVO Nordisk Foundation, the Danish Research Council for Health and Disease, the Danish Heart Association and the Research Foundation of the Danish Kidney Society. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Inge Andersen, Mette Fredenslund, Ulla Melchior Hansen, Bodil Kristiansen, Hannelore Lemming, Ole Madsen, Camilla Rasmussen and Mette Svendsen.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.



   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Dieperink H, Leyssac PP, Starklint H, et al. Long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in the rat: effects on renal function and morphology. Nephrol Dial Transplant (1988) 3:317–326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Iacona A, Rossetti A, Filingeri V, et al. Reduced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in cyclosporine A therapy by enalapril and spironolactone in rats. Drugs Exp Clin Res (1991) 17:501–506.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Feria I, Pichardo I, Juarez P, et al. Therapeutic benefit of spironolactone in experimental chronic cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int (2003) 63:43–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. McAuley FT, Whiting PH, Thomson AW, et al. The influence of enalapril or spironolactone on experimental cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Biochem Pharmacol (1987) 36:699–703.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Pérez-Rojas J, Blanco JA, Cruz C, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade confers renoprotection in preexisting chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2007) 292:F131–F139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Burgess ED, Lacourciere Y, Ruilope-Urioste LM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Ther (2003) 25(9):2388–2404.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Dieperink H, Kemp E, Leyssac PP, et al. Cyclosporine A: effectiveness and toxicity in a rat model. Clin Nephrol (1986) 25(Suppl_1):S46–S50.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Blasi ER, Rocha R, Rudolph AE, et al. Aldosterone/salt induces renal inflammation and fibrosis in hypertensive rats. Kidney Int (2003) 63:1791–1800.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Gabel RA, Ranaei RA, Kivlighn SD. A new method of measuring renal function in conscious rats without the use of radioisotopes. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods (1996) 36:189–197.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Poulsen K, Jorgensen J. An easy radioimmunological microassay of renin activity, concentration and substrate in human and animal plasma and tissues based on angiotensin I trapping by antibody. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1974) 39:816–825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Emmeluth C, Bie P. Effects, release and disposal of endothelin-1 in conscious dogs. Acta Physiol Scand (1992) 146:197–204.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Thomsen K, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Leyssac PP. Comparison of three measures of proximal tubular reabsorption: lithium clearance, occlusion time, and micropuncture. Am J Physiol (1981) 241:F348–F355.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Nielsen FT, Leyssac PP, Kemp E, et al. Nephrotoxicity of FK506 in the rat. Studies on glomerular and tubular function, and on the relationship between efficacy and toxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant (1995) 10:334–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nielsen FT, Ottosen P, Starklint H, et al. Kidney function and morphology after short-term combination therapy with cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and sirolimus in the rat. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18:491–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chander V, Chopra K. Nifedipine attenuates changes in nitric oxide levels, renal oxidative stress, and nephrotoxicity induced by cyclosporine. Ren Fail (2005) 27:441–450.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Chander V, Singh D, Tirkey N, et al. Amelioration of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity by irbesartan, a selective AT1 receptor antagonist. Ren Fail (2004) 26:467–477.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Nishiyama A, Abe Y. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of chronic renal injury: renoprotective effects of aldosterone blockade. J Pharmacol (2006) 100:9–16.[Web of Science]
  18. Shihab FS, Yi H, Bennett WM, et al. Effect of nitric oxide modulation on TGF-beta 1 and matrix proteins in chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int (2000) 58:1174–1185.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Pérez-Rojas J, Derive S, Blanco JA, et al. Renocortical mRNA expression of vasoactive factors during spironolactone protective effect in chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2005) 289:1020–1030.[CrossRef]
Received for publication: 8. 6.07
Accepted in revised form: 19. 3.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2777    most recent
gfn204v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bie, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?