NDT Advance Access first published online on June 16, 2007
This version published online on August 3, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm388
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open access World Wide Web resources on urogenital infections*
1Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 2Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece and 3Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Matthew E. Falagas, Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece. Email: m.falagas{at}aibs.gr
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background. Urinary tract infections are the most common infections seen in hospitalized patients and the second most common, after respiratory tract infections, seen in the general population. The World Wide Web can now assist healthcare professionals in finding up-to-date information on different medical conditions.
Methods. We sought to identify websites that contain information on urogenital infections by using popular search engines, such as Google and Yahoo. We also reviewed the sites of major institutions, and international healthcare associations. Only those sites that were written in English, were open access, and developed by a government, academic institution or a national or international healthcare professionals association were included.
Results. We selected 114 sites that provide healthcare professionals with useful information on urogenital infections based on the criteria described above.
Conclusions. There are several free websites that contain worthy information on urogenital infections. The compilation of a list of Internet resources on these common types of infections may be useful to practitioners and medical students.
Keywords: cystitis; epididymitis; orchitis; prostatitis; pyelonephritis; urethritis; urinary tract infection
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common infections seen in hospitalized patients and the second most common infections seen in the general population [1]. It is estimated that in the US, UTIs account for seven million office visits and one million hospitalizations every year [2,3]. Another study showed that the prevalence of nosocomial urinary tract infections in Europe was 10% [4]. Moreover, inflammatory diseases of the prostate and the distal genital tract are emerging as a major health problem. It is estimated that up to 15% of adult men may be affected at some point in their lives [5]. Another issue is when to treat and what is the appropriate treatment of urogenital infections [6,7].
The need for education and constant updating on such a common clinical condition can now be achieved with the use of the World Wide Web (WWW). However, the large volume of resources that are available makes it difficult to discriminate, which are the appropriate resources [8]. Therefore, we tried to identify major websites with information on urogenital infections, as a guide to healthcare professionals.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Popular Internet search engines, including Google and Yahoo, were used to identify websites that provide information on genito-urinary tract infections. The methods for identifying the relevant websites as well as the reasoning for selecting the appropriate resources for inclusion in our list of websites have been described elsewhere [9]. The terms we used were ‘urinary tract infection’, ‘pyelonephritis’, ‘cystitis’, ‘urethritis’, ‘prostatitis’, ‘epididymitis’, ‘orchitis’, ‘haemodialysis’, ‘peritoneal dialysis’, ‘kidney transplantation’ and a combination of these terms. The first 200 hits on each search engine were further reviewed. PubMed and Current Contents database were also searched using the previously used terms and ‘world wide web’.
We also searched the sites of major institutions, namely Harvard University, Karolinska institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases, American Academy of Family Physicians, European Association of Urology, American Society for Nephrology and American Urological Association. Finally, relevant links to other web resources found in the websites of the above mentioned institutions as well. We explored these links to search for further information.
To be included in our list, a website had to be developed by a government, academic institution, or a national or international healthcare professionals association, as a guarantee of accuracy and overall validity for the information provided. Personal sites were excluded. In addition, we included only those sites that were written in English and those that offered free access to the user (sites requiring free registration were included in our list). Finally, we included some sites that were mainly designed for public use. The reason for our decision was that these sites contained information that could be useful to healthcare professionals.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Our final analysis yielded 114 addresses containing information on urogenital infections (Supplementary Table 1, see www.ndt.oxfordjounals.org). Of these, 43 were dealing with urinary tract infections (pyelonephritis, cystitis and urethritis), five specifically with pyelonephritis, 18 with prostatitis, 20 with epididymitis and orchitis and 14 with urethritis. Some websites dealt with more specific diseases. Out of these, six sites were concerned with pyelonephritis in transplanted patients, three with pyelonephritis in patients undergoing dialysis, two with pregnancy and UTIs and one site contained guidelines for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Finally, two sites contained images of diseases of the urinary tract.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Medical sciences resemble living organisms in the way of evolution and knowledge expansion. The information that is aggregated every day has become so large over the last years that physicians cannot easily assimilate without help from current technology. The WWW offers physicians the opportunity for continuous medical education. Well-written reviews as well as findings from comparative trials are available online. Medical societies, universities, other institutions and organizations, as well as medical journals offer valuable information for everyday practice. Their websites include the majority of the relevant available online information.
On the other hand, the data available online is huge and on several occasions users find even frequently used Internet portals containing potentially misleading information. Thus, the selection of the most appropriate website that contains the desirable information is difficult. Our aim was to identify websites that provide updated information and which can be useful to practising physicians as well as doctors in training. It is noteworthy that major foundations like Harvard University as well as highly respected journals like the ‘Annals of Internal Medicine’ offer a considerable amount of information free of charge.
In the table of this manuscript, we present a selected list of relevant WWW resources from the numerous websites that offer information regarding infections of the urogenital tract. We recognize that several other websites that may also offer valuable information on this issue might have been omitted. However, even if someone included all of the available relevant sites, the produced list probably would have been impractical.
For all the websites included in our list, at least one specific Internet address link is provided. In several of the selected websites, the provided information was comprehensive. Detailed texts were provided in the selected websites that targeted specialists of the field. It should be mentioned that we included some websites that provided information mainly for the public. The reason for including these sites to the list we compiled was that they could also contain useful information for physicians.
In summary, we put together a list of open access, English language WWW resources on urogenital infections (excluding obstetrical and gynaecological infections that have been out of the scope of the present work) that may be useful to doctors in training and practice with access to Internet.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
|
Notes |
|---|
*For the list of open access world wide web resources on urogenital infections, please see NDT website http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
- Valiquette L. Urinary tract infections in women. Can J Urol (2001) 8(Suppl. 1):6–12.[Medline]
- Falagas ME, Gorbach SL. Urinary tract infections: Practice guidelines. Infect Dis Clin Pract (1995) 4:241–277.[CrossRef]
- Falagas ME, Gorbach SL. Prostatitis, epididymitis, and urethritis: Practice guidelines. Infect Dis Clin Pract (1995) 4:325–333.[CrossRef]
- Bjerklund Johansen TE, Cek M, Naber K, et al, on behalf of the PEP and PEAP study investigators; the board of the European Society of Infections in Urology. Prevalence of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections in urology departments. In: Eur Urol 2006. [Epub ahead of print].
- Langer JE, Cornud F. Inflammatory disorders of the prostate and the distal genital tract. Radiol Clin North Am (2006) 44:649–663.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Liu H, Mulholland SG. Appropriate antibiotic treatment of genitourinary infections in hospitalized patients. Am J Med (2005) 118(Suppl. 7A):14S.
- Naber KG, Bergman B, Bishop MC, et al. EAU guidelines for the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Working Group of the Health Care Office (HCO) of the European Association of Urology (EAU). Eur Urol (2001) 40:576–588.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, et al. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. Brit Med J (1999) 318:647–649.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Siempos II, Fragoulis KN, Falagas ME. World wide web resources on control of nosocomial infections. Crit Care (2007) 11:101.[CrossRef][Medline]
Accepted in revised form: 24. 5.07
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||