Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 13, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(8):2707; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn265
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/8/2707    most recent
gfn265v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kasiske, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kasiske, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Troponin T is an independent predictor of mortality in renal transplant recipients

E-mail: shrof010{at}umn.edu

Sir,

The article by Connolly et al. [1] is an important addition to the literature pertaining to cardiovascular disease (CVD) management of kidney transplant recipients. Although interesting, it is not an unexpected finding that higher levels of troponin T were associated with worse CVD outcomes in patients with a high CVD risk profile. In this study, patients with elevated troponin T levels (≥0.03 µg/L) were older and had known CVD compared to patients without troponin T elevation. Similarly, kidney transplant recipients who died during follow-up were older, more likely to have diabetes or prior CVD compared to surviving patients. The presence of pre-existing coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure was not reported in the description of the study population. Increased age, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure and previous CVD are known to portend a poor prognosis in kidney transplant recipients [2,3], and patients with these CVD risk factors should undergo aggressive risk factor modification irrespective of their troponin level.

It would be extremely interesting, however, if the authors were able to stratify patients with elevated levels of troponin T (≥0.03 µg/L) into two groups (low and high risk) based on the presence or absence of known CVD risk factors [4]. It would be relevant for clinicians to know what proportion of ‘low risk’ patients had elevated troponin levels and died during follow-up in this study. ‘Low risk’ patients do not routinely undergo aggressive CVD risk factor modification. Thus, elevated troponin T levels in ‘low risk’ patients might help to identify a subgroup of patients that might benefit from aggressive CVD risk management.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Gautam R. Shroff1 and Bertram L. Kasiske2

1 Division of Cardiology 2 Division of Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

References

  1. Connolly GM, Cunningham R, McNamee PT, et al. Troponin T is an independent predictor of mortality in renal transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2008) 23:1019–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pilmore H. Cardiac assessment for renal transplantation. Am J Transplant (2006) 6:659–665.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S, et al. The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant (2001) 1(Suppl_2):3–95.[Medline]
  4. Lewis MS, Wilson RA, Walker KW, et al. Validation of an algorithm for predicting cardiac events in renal transplant candidates. Am J Cardiol (2002) 89:847–850.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Received for publication: 12. 3.08
Accepted in revised form: 17. 4.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/8/2707    most recent
gfn265v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kasiske, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shroff, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kasiske, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?