NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 6, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(7):2123-2126; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn096
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The impact of residual renal function on survival
Division of Nephrology, Hospital Straubing, Germany
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Marianne Haag-Weber, Klinikum Straubing, St Elisabeth-Str. 23, D-94315 Straubing, Germany. Tel: +49-9421-782633; Fax: +49-9421-782646; E-mail: marianne.haag-weber{at}kfh-dialyse.de
Keywords: haemodialysis; mortality; peritoneal dialysis; residual renal function
Dialysis patients have 10–20 higher mortality rates compared to controls. Factors discussed to influence mortality in dialysis patients are hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), increased pulse pressure, phosphorus, calcification, inflammation, malnutrition, fluid and sodium balance, interdialytic weight gain, removal of middle molecule uraemic toxins and residual renal function (RRF) [1]. LVH and hypertension are frequent findings in dialysis patients and the presence of LVH has been confirmed to be an important independent determinant of survival in dialysis patients [2]. One main goal is therefore to prevent LVH and control hypertension. Whereas the role of RRF for survival is well recognized in the peritoneal dialysis population, RRF is not currently emphasized in haemodialysis (HD) patients [3,4]. At the moment there exist two strategies for HD patients: (1) control of hypertension mainly by volume control with no or few antihypertensive drugs at the expense of early loss of RRF and (2) preservation of RRF and control of hypertension with antihypertensive drugs.
The aim of this editorial should be to discuss the role of RRF for survival of dialysis patients with a special focus on the way of controlling hypertension in dialysis patients.
| Residual renal function and uraemic toxicity profile |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several years ago, Cheung [5] already demonstrated that renal clearance is superior to dialysate clearance in eliminating toxins >10 000 Da. This was confirmed by many other studies showing an overriding importance of RRF in beta2-M clearance and plasma levels [6,7]. RRF is also associated with better removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins like p-Cresol and phosphate [6]. Preservation of RRF is associated with lower plasma levels of AGE compounds in PD patients [8]. Another study also found an association of RRF and plasma levels of inflammation mediators, such as Il-6, CRP, hyaluron and nepterin [9].
Besides the overriding effect of RRF on middle molecule clearance, RRF is also of great importance in fluid and sodium removal. Cheng et al. [10] found a significant higher sodium removal in PD patients with RRF compared to anuric patients.
| Residual renal function in relation to volume state/hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There has been an intriguing concern as to whether preservation of RRF in dialysis patients is actually at the expense of chronic volume overload. Gunal et al. [11] in a prospective study of 19 incident HD patients subjected these patients for 3 months to antihypertensive therapy initially followed by 3 months of strict volume control with salt restriction. There was a 6% reduction in the LVH after antihypertensive therapy, compared with a 36% reduction after strict volume control. A dramatic fall of urine output after strict volume control was noted. The authors concluded that volume control had more significant effects when compared with blood pressure control alone with antihypertensives in inducing regression of LVH and that loss of RRF is the price to be paid. Limitations of this study should be a very small study population, better blood pressure control under volume control as opposed to antiyhypertensives and a short follow-up period.
This study is in direct contrast to the retrospective study by Wang et al. [15] where loss of RRF was associated with more severe LVH. Similar results as found by Wang are described by Menon et al. [13] showing that blood pressure control worsened with time on peritoneal dialysis as RRF declines. Wang [12] argues that loss of RRF is associated with more severe anaemia, greater degree of hypoalbuminaemia and higher arterial pressure, all well-known risk factors for cardiac hypertrophy. Other factors besides volume control like uraemic toxins and inflammation might play a role in LVH.
Lower extracellular fluid was observed in PD patients with a GFR >2 ml/min compared to patients with GFR <2 ml/min despite higher peritoneal ultrafiltration [14]. Cheng et al. [10] in contrast to Konings et al. [14] found no difference in extracellular fluid and even higher mean blood pressure in patients with preserved RRF compared to anuric patients despite higher fluid and sodium removal in patients with RRF. The authors argued that the patients with RRF had possibly a higher intake of sodium than the anuric group since serum sodium was higher in this group. A study by Ates et al. confirmed the importance of total sodium and fluid removal in predicting survival of peritoneal dialysis patients. Total sodium and fluid removal was negatively correlated to blood pressure and significantly influenced hospitalization [15]. The importance of sodium balance was supported by Gunal et al. [16] showing that simple dietary restriction of salt intake was able to restore normal volume status in PD patients. Sodium balance achieved by low-sodium diet seems to be the key for volume control. The importance of low-sodium diet in HD has also been pointed out by Tuccillo et al. [17]. It has been proven that the normalization of blood pressure and volume overload with a low-salt diet is associated with LVH regression and diastolic dysfunction improvement. Ahmad [18] and Kooman et al. [19] also suggest that the effective management of hypertension requires normalization of the sodium balance. Use of diuretics was shown to increase urine volume and sodium, but not urea or creatinine excretion in PD patients [20,21]. Bragg-Gresham et al. [22] showed that HD patients administered diuretics had a 7% lower all-cause mortality risk and 14% lower cardiac-specific mortality risk. The authors argued that the positive effect of diuretic may simply reflect the known survival benefit conferred by RRF.
| Residual renal function and survival |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several recent publications confirm that RRF and not the dose of peritoneal dialysis clearance was a powerful predictor of survival in PD patients [3]. RRF of 1 ml/min or 0.5 ml/min was associated with a 12% reduction of mortality in the NECOSAC study [23] and CANUSA study [24]. Reanalysis of the CANUSA study [24] showed that every 250 ml urine output was associated with a 36% reduction in overall mortality. There exist only few studies on the effect of RRF on survival in HD patients. Shemin et al. [25] reported that RRF was associated with a lower mortality risk in 114 prevalent HD patients in a prospective cross-sectional observational study. Termorshuizen et al. [26] analysed 740 HD patients and showed that each increase of 1/week in renal Kt/V was associated with an RR of death of 0.44. In contrast to these studies, Ozkahya et al. [27] found in their HD patient population a better long-term survival treated with strict volume control compared to US, EDTA and Turkish dialysis registries. Since Ozkahya et al. also applied to their dialysis population a strict sodium restriction of 5 g per day, this alone might be the cause for the better survival compared to the registries. Such a strict sodium restriction is usually not applied to the general dialysis population in Europe and the United States. Charra [28] blames in his review that sodium restriction has been forgotten over the years and a very liberal diet of 10–15 g sodium per day is used in Europe.
| How to control hypertension in dialysis patients |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The key for blood pressure control in dialysis patients seems to be sodium restriction. Progressively, as renal failure worsens, the capacity of the kidney to excrete sodium decreases, and salt sensitivity and the incidence for hypertension increase. About 90% of end-stage renal failure patients are hypertensive and excess sodium is the dominant factor [28]. A sodium load essentially acts by expanding the ECV. Therefore, patients have to be educated to restrict sodium intake already in predialysis state and also by dialysis patient with preserved RRF to avoid volume overload.
Balancing sodium intake and removal is easier with RRF since sodium removal can be increased by diuretics. Furthermore, patients with RRF have less problems with potassium. Since potassium restriction in the diet is often contradictory to sodium restriction, it should be easier for patients with RRF to realize sodium restriction.
An independent protective effect of antihypertensive drugs on mortality was reported by Agarwal [2]. He postulated that ACE inhibitors and beta blockers appear to be attractive agents due to their independent cardiovascular benefits. Drugs that block the sympathetic nervous system are uniformly protective in dialysis patients [29]. A novel flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent amine oxidase, called renalase, was recently discovered. It is secreted by the kidney and metabolizes catecholamines. The plasma concentration of renalase is markedly reduced in patients with end-stage renal disease. Renalase reduces sympathic activity, decreases cardiac contractility and blood pressure and prevents increase in peripheral vascular tone. Low levels of renalase might be an explanation for the increased sympathic activity found in dialysis patients [30].
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preservation of RRF improves survival both in peritoneal and HD patients. RRF is important for clearances of middle molecules and sodium removal. Up to now, there exists no prospective controlled study to answer the question about the right strategy especially in HD. We need prospective studies comparing blood pressure control via aggressive ultrafiltration control and sodium restriction at the expense of RRF or with drugs, sodium restriction and preservation of RRF. Preservation of RRF makes it necessary to control volume status of the patients. Sodium restriction in patients with and without RRF seems to be the prerequisite to avoid overhydration.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Wang AM. The importance of residual renal function in dialysis patients. Kidney Int (2006) 69:1726–1732.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Agarwal R. Hypertension and survival in chronic hemodialysis patients—past lessons and future opportunities. Kidney Int (2005) 67:1–13.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bargman JM, Golper TA. The importance of residual renal function for patients on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2005) 20:671–673.
[Free Full Text] - Ng TG, Johnson DW, Hawley CM. Is it time to revisit residual renal function in haemodialysis? Nephrology (2007) 12:209–217.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Cheung AK. Quantitation of dialysis. The importance of membrane and middle molecules. Blood Purif (1994) 12:42–53.[ISI][Medline]
- Bammens B, Evenpoel P, Verbeke K, et al. Removal of middle molecules and protein-bound solutes by peritoneal dialysis and relation with uremic symptoms. Kidney Int (2003) 64:2238–2243.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Fry AC, Singh DK, Chandna SM, et al. Relative importance of residual renal function and convection in determining beta-2-microglobulin levels in high-flux haemodialysis and on-line haemofiltration. Blood Purif (2007) 25:295–302.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Van de Kerkhof J, Schalwijk CG, Konings CJ, et al. Nepsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in relation to peritoneal glucose presciption and residual renal function: a study in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19:910–916.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pecoits-Filho R, Heimburger O, Barany P, et al. Associations between circulating inflammatory markers and residual renal function in CRF patients. Am J Kidney Dis (2003) 41:1212–1218.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Cheng LT, Chen W, Tang W, et al. Residual renal function and volume control in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract (2006) 104:47–54.[CrossRef]
- Gunal AI, Kirciman E, Guler M, et al. Should the preservation of residual renal function cost volume overload and its consequence left ventricular hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients? Ren Fail (2004) 26:405–409.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Wang AY, Wang M, Woo J, et al. A novel association between residual renal function and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int (2002) 62:639–647.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Menon MK, Nalmark DM, Bargman Jm, et al. Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16:2207–2213.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Konings CJ, Kooman JP, Schonck M, et al. Fluid status in CAPD patients is related to peritoneal transport and residual renal function: evidence from a longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18:396–403.
- Ates K, Nergizoglu G, Keven K, et al. Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int (2001) 60:767–776.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Gunal AI, Duman S, Ozkahya M. Strict volume control normalizes hypertension in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis (2001) 37:588–593.[ISI][Medline]
- Tucillo S, De Nicola L, Minutolo R, et al. Hypertension in patients on hemodialysis: the role of salt intake. G Intal Nefrol (2005) 22:456–465.
- Ahmad S. Dietary sodium restriction for hypertension in dialysis patients. Semin Dial (2004) 17:284.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Kooman JP, Van Der Sande F, Leunissen K, et al. Sodium balance in hemodialysis therapy. Semin Dial (2003) 16:351–355.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- van Olden RW, Guchelaar HJ, Struijk DG, et al. Acute effects of high dose furosemide on residual renal function in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int (2003) 23:339–347.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Medcalf JF, Harris KP, Walls J. Role of diuretic in the preservation of residual renal function in CAPD patients. Kidney Int (2001) 59:1128–1133.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bragg-Gresham JL, Fissel RB, Mason NA, et al. Diuretic use, residual renal function and mortality among hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis (2007) 49:426–431.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, et al. The relative contribution of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. Am J Kidney Dis (2003; 41) 1293–1302.
- Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance on adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol (2001) 12:2158–2168.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Shemin D, Bostom AG, Laliberty P, et al. Residual renal function and mortality risk in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis (2001) 38:85–90.[ISI][Medline]
- Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, et al. Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAC)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol (2004) 15:1061–1070.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ozkahya M, Ok E, Huseyin T, et al. Long-term survival rates in haemodialysis patients treated with strict volume control. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2006) 21:3506–3513.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Charra B. Fluid balance, dry weight, and blood pressure in dialysis. Hemodialysis Int (2007) 11:21–31.[CrossRef]
- Santos SF, Peixoto AJ. Hypertension and dialysis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens (2005) 14:111–118.[ISI][Medline]
- Renalase is a novel, soluble monoamine oxidase that regulates cardiac function and blood pressure. J Clin Invest (2005) 115:1275–1280.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Accepted in revised form: 1. 2.08
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||