Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 17, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(5):1765-1766; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm840
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/1765    most recent
gfm840v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SantaCruz, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SantaCruz, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



About CKD stage-3 subdivision proposal

Correspondence and offprint requests to: E-mail: plsantacruz{at}cantv.net

Sir,

I have read very carefully the paper published in a recent issue of NDT about DOQI-NKF classification of CKD stage-3 related [1]. In short, Abutaleb et al. proposed subdividing CKD-3 into two stages: 3a and 3b, respectively.

There is no doubt that CKD is increasing in a dramatic way, and is recognized as a global public health problem, representing a heavy burden not only for the patients, but also for their families and for the society [2,3]. On the other hand, CKD patients are more likely to die, mainly from cardiovascular disease (CVD) before progressing to stage 5 [4].

On this theme, it would be good to remember the Hoorn study, which demonstrated that mild renal function impairment was associated with a significant CV mortality when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was <70 ml/min/ 1.73 m2bs with an important increase in the risk of CV death by each 5 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease [5]; this might be a plausible explanation for the highly different death rates among CKD stages 3 and 4.

I agree with the use of two subdivisions of 15 ml/min/ 1.73 m2bs ranged components, 3a (GFR 59–45 ml/min/ 1.73 m2bs) and 3b (GFR 44–30 ml/min/1.73 m2bs) because it seems logical to think this would help to define more accurately the level within CKD stage 3 at which mortality becomes a real problem for the international nephrology community, health authorities and of course, patients and their relatives.

However, as a current point of view, renal transplantation must continue to be considered as a form of renal replacement therapy (RRT), because even though successful kidney transplantation results in an improved quality of life and is certainly a better therapeutic option than haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, unfortunately it is not always possible to reach complete renal recovery. Besides, the transplant recipient will require a permanent immunosuppressive regimen and close medical control; furthermore, nowhere in the world are there sufficient human kidney donors for patients with CKD-5, waiting for a renal transplantation.

For those reasons among others, we believe it impossible to develop a global strategy to recommend kidney allograft as a standard modality of treatment for CKD stage 3 or 4.

We believe that the cornerstone in the global struggle against CKD, especially for developing countries, is PREVENTION.

Conflict of Interest Statemen: None declared.

Pedro L. SantaCruz

Program of Renal Health CORPOSALUD-Aragua, Universidad Bicentenaria de Aragua, Maracay, Aragua State, Venezuela

References

  1. Abutaleb N. Why we should subdivide CKD stage 3 into early (3a) and late (3b) components. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2007) 22:2728–2729.[Free Full Text]
  2. Levey AS, Atkins R, Coresh J, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives—a position statement from kidney disease improving global outcomes. Kidney Int (2007) 72:247–259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Hamer RA, El Nahas AM. The burden of chronic kidney disease. BMJ (2006) 332:563–564.[Free Full Text]
  4. Gil P, Justo S, Caramelo C. Cardio-renal failure: an emerging clinical entity. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2005) 20:1780–1783.[Free Full Text]
  5. Henry RMA, Kostense PJ, Bos G, et al. Mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: the Hoorn study. Kidney Int (2003) 62:1402–1407.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/1765    most recent
gfm840v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SantaCruz, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SantaCruz, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?