Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on June 25, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(11):3292-3297; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm402
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/3292    most recent
gfm402v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baragetti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Buccianti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baragetti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Buccianti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Improvement of endothelial function in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis: a possible role for 5-MTHF administration

Ivano Baragetti1, Sara Raselli2, Andrea Stucchi1, Veronica Terraneo1, Silvia Furiani1, Laura Buzzi1, Katia Garlaschelli2, Elena Alberghini1, Alberico L. Catapano2 and Gherardo Buccianti1

1Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo, Milan 2Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Center for the Study of Atherosclerosis, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ivano Baragetti, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Presidio E. Bassini, Via Gorki 50, CAP: 20092, Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy. Email: i.baragetti{at}bassini.hsgerardo.org



   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Background. Hyperhomocysteinaemia is an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, homocysteine induces endothelial dysfunction by an increased inactivation of nitric oxide. In patients with chronic renal failure, the administration of folic acid or its metabolites reduces but does not normalize plasma homocysteine concentrations.

Methods. We examined the effect of oral treatment with 15 mg/daily of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) for 12 weeks, on homocysteinaemia and endothelial function in 19 patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and compared them, for the same period of time, to a control group of patients on peritoneal dialysis. Endothelial function was evaluated by B-mode ultrasonography on the brachial artery. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was recorded during reactive hyperaemia produced by the inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet. Nitroglycerine-mediated dilation (NMD) was recorded after sublingual administration of glyceryl trinitrate. Finally, oxidative stress was assessed by evaluating the conjugated dienes plasma levels.

Results. Plasma homocysteine concentrations fell by 30% after oral treatment with 5-MTHF. Endothelial function improved significantly after oral 5-MTHF treatment (13.8 ± 1.2% vs 11.4 ± 1.4%; P < 0.02) while in the control group we observed a worsening of basal values from 12.1 ± 2.66% to 8.7 ± 2.90% (P < 0.02). The conjugated dienes plasma levels did not change either.

Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that 5-MTHF administration improves endothelial dysfunction in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. This effect appears to be independent of the reduction in homocysteine plasma levels.

Keywords: atherosclerosis; endothelial function; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; plasma homocysteine; peritoneal dialysis



   Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Several studies have already shown a positive relationship between homocysteine and cardiovascular events in the general population [1]. Hyperhomocysteinaemia is frequently seen in patients with chronic kidney disease and is present in more than 90% of patients on dialysis treatment, independent of the vitamin B status [2]. Four prospective studies have observed that homocysteine is a marker of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in haemodialysis patients [3–6]. However, no causal relationship between hyperhomocysteinaemia and cardiovascular outcomes was demonstrated. Some studies have reported an inverse relationship between homocysteine and cardiovascular risk [7,8]. Homocysteine, however, was also positively correlated with nutritional status, and malnutrition could have been a confounding factor.

Treatment with folic acid lowers, but does not normalize homocysteine plasma concentrations in dialysis patients. In healthy subjects, administration of folic acid prevents endothelial dysfunction produced by acute [9] or persistent hyperhomocysteinaemia [10]. Similar improvement of endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilatation is observed in patients with familiar hypercholesterolaemia, independent of homocysteine plasma levels [11]. Finally, folic acid improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease [12]. The effect of folic acid on endothelial function in uraemic patients on dialysis treatment is still a matter of debate. While some studies showed no improvement of endothelial function in haemodialysis patients [13] or in peritoneal dialysis patients [14] by the administration of folic acid, in a previous study we found an improvement of endothelial function with the active metabolite of folic acid 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) treatment, administered intravenously 15 mg/week, in patients undergoing acetate free biofiltration [15].

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether 5-MTHF, administered orally for 12 weeks, could restore endothelial function and affect homocysteine plasma concentrations in peritoneal dialysis patients.



   Subjects and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Patients
We studied a group of patients treated with 5-MTHF (treatment group) and a control group of patients. The first one consisted of 19 clinically stable patients (4 diabetics), 10 men and 9 women (mean age: 56 ± 3 years), with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; autosomal dominant polycystic disease in four cases, chronic pyelonephritis in one, diabetic nephropathy in 2, nephroangiosclerosis in 5, IgA nephropathy in 1, membranous glomerulonephritis in 1, amyloidosis in 1, focal glomerulosclerosis in 1, nephronophthisis in 1, 2 unknown), on peritoneal dialysis for a mean period of 17 ± 5 months. 10 patients were in continous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with isotonic dialysate and icodextrin. Nine patients were in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) with isotonic dialysate, hypertonic dialysate and icodextrin. The second group acted as controls and consisted of 8 patients (two diabetics), 5 men and 3 women (mean age: 66 + 2 years) with ESRD [diabetic nephropathy in 2 cases, nephroangiosclerosis in 2, chronic pyelonephritis in 2, chronic glomerulonephritis in 1 and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) abusing in 1] on peritoneal dialysis for a mean period of 23.6 + 4.4 months. 5 patients were in CAPD with isotonic dialysate and icodextrin. 3 patients were in APD with isotonic dialysate, hypertonic dialysate and icodextrin. All the patients were taking antihypertensive medications and the two groups were similar in terms of hypolipaemic treatment (27% in the treatment group and 37% in the control group were taking statins, P = NS). All patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study.

Study design
According to the study design, patients first underwent a 12-month washout from folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation (T1). The study group patients received treatment with oral administration of 15 mg 5-MTHF daily for 12 weeks (T2), while the controlled group did not receive any drug influencing plasma homocysteine concentration for the same period of time.

Plasma homocysteine and conjugate dienes were determined at T1 and T2. Endothelial function during reactive hyperaemia and after administration of glyceryl trinitrate was evaluated at the beginning and at the end of the study in both groups of patients.

Laboratory methods
After an overnight fast, blood was collected into tubes containing NaEDTA (0.1 mg/ml), and plasma was separated by low-speed centrifugation at 4°C. The measurement of plasma lipids was performed by standard enzymatic techniques (HORIBA ABX for Cobas Mira Plus, Montpellier, France).

Plasma homocysteine, plasma folates and erythrocyte folate concentrations were determined as described elsewhere [15].

Conjugated dienes were assessed as follows: 200 µl of suspension was mixed with 3 ml of a solution of chlorophormium/methanol (2:1) and 200 µl of PBS. After 10 min of centrifugation at 3000 r.p.m 1.5 ml of chlorophormic phase was dried with N2 and then, after a dilution with cyclohexane, learned at {lambda} = 234 nm and {lambda} = 300 nm. Adsorbance was multiplied with 2.95 x 104 M–1 cm–1, obtaining molar concentration.

Endothelial function test
Endothelial function was evaluated non-invasively by B-mode ultrasonography (Biosound Au4 idea) as described elsewhere [15]. Briefly, each subject was requested to lie at rest for 10 min in a temperature-controlled room (21°C ± 1), and the first scan of brachial artery in the left arm was taken.

This was followed by inflation of a standard pneumatic tourniquet placed around the upper arm at a pressure of 250 mmHg, followed by deflation after 4.5 min. Electrocardiography was monitored continuously during the study and measurements were taken at the end diastole. The reproducibility of the assay was determined by repeating the measurement on 15 subjects on consecutive days by the same observer. The coefficient of variation of the assay was 7%. During each test, vessel images were taken at rest and during reactive hyperaemia; flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was calculated 90–210 s after the deflation of a pneumatic tourniquet. Nitroglycerine-mediated dilation (NMD) was calculated as the percentage in variation between the basal diameter and the maximum diameter after sublingual administration or glyceryl trinitrate 0.3 mg.

Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA). Results are reported as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated. Group differences in continuous variables were determined by using a paired Student's t-test. Group differences or Pearson correlations with P < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.



   Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
No differences at baseline were seen in terms of patient characteristics and biochemical data between treatment and control group (Table 1). Biochemical results at T1 and T2 in the treated patients are shown in Table 2. At the beginning of the study, endothelial function showed a trend in the correlation with intraerythrocyte folates (R = 0.51, P = 0.077).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Comparison of patient characteristics at baseline: treated group vs control group

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Treated group characteristics at T1 and at T2

 
Plasma homocysteine concentrations were significantly higher at the end of the washout (37.3 ± 5.6 µmol/l) and decreased by about 30% after 5-MTHF oral treatment (to 20.71 ± 1.3 µmol/l; P < 0.008) (Figure 1). In the control group, homocysteine plasma concentrations increased by 12% (from 44.3 ± 9.7 µmol/l to 49.8 ± 17.9 µmol/l).


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of treatment with 5-MTHF on plasma homocysteine concentration at T1 and T2 in the treated group and in the control group of patients.

 
Folate treatment did not modify plasma levels of conjugated dienes (189 ± 30 vs 172 ± 20 mg/dl, P = NS) or lipid parameters.

Endothelial function in terms of the percent variation in vessel diameter induced by hyperaemia increased significantly after 5-MTHF oral treatment (13.8 ± 1.2 vs 11.5 ± 1.4%; P = 0.016) (Figure 2), while in the control group we observed a worsening of basal values from 12.2 ± 2.6% to 8.7 ± 2.9% (P = 0.016).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in peritoneal patients before and after 5-MTHF oral treatment and in the control group. The figure shows a significant impairment of FMD after the administration of 5-MTHF and a worsening of endothelial function in the control group of patients.

 
Non-endothelium-derived dilation by nitrate administration did not change in both groups of patients (21.2 ± 2.1 vs 20.1 ± 2.9%, P = NS in the treated group and 20.3 ± 2.04 vs 20.5 ± 3.1% in the control group). We did not observe any relationship between homocysteine plasma concentrations and endothelial function.



   Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
In haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, all the authors reported that folic acid or its derivatives, administered orally at doses varying from 1 to 60 mg, all appear to reduce homocysteine plasma levels from 30% to 40% [16]. However, normalization of homocysteine plasma concentrations has never been demonstrated. In this study, we confirmed these results, observing a reduction of homocysteine by 30% from the basal values administering 5-MTHF. We also observed an improvement of endothelial function in our population of peritoneal dialysis patients without detecting any relationship between homocysteine plasma concentrations and endothelial function. Instead, we found a positive relationship between erythrocyte folate and FMD at baseline. Patients’ clinical conditions and plasma albumin levels were not changed during the study.

Recently, Jiang and colleagues [17] found in mouse and human endothelial cells that hyperhomocysteinaemia impairs endothelial function and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, primarily through protein kinase C activation. They found that arterial relaxation in response to the endothelium-dependent vessel relaxant, acetylcholine or nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activator, was significantly impaired in cystathionine β-synthase null (CBS –/–) mice. However, the vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) response to the nitric oxide (NO) donor (SNAP) was preserved in CBS –/– mice. In addition, superoxide dismutase and catalase failed to restore endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Hcy-mediated eNOS inhibition was associated with decreased e-NOS protein expression and increased threonine 495 phosphorylation of eNOS in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). Ultimately, a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, GF109203X (GFX), reversed Hcy-mediated eNOS inactivation and threonine 495 phosphorylation in HAECs. Hyperhomocysteinaemia causes endothelial dysfunction and it is a marker of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in uraemic patients [3–6]. Nevertheless, malnutrition could overcome it [18] and the beneficial effect of folic acid on cardiovascular outcome could be lost. The majority of clinical trials failed to show any improvement of cardiovascular risk by the administration of folic acid [19–21], only one showed a beneficial effect [22]. The role of folic acid in improving cardiovascular outcome in uraemia is not yet clear. The confounding results of these trials could be a consequence of the malnutrition present in a large portion of dialysis patients. In fact, in this condition, folic acid could be less effective in improving hyperhomocysteinaemia either for the low levels of homocysteine plasma concentration in malnourished patients and because malnutrition could overcome folic acid supplementation in worsening their cardiovascular outcome.

Also, a resistance to folic acid supplementation is described in uraemia. Folate of dietary origin, introduced in the form of polyglutamate, requires the presence of glutamyl carboxypeptidase for transformation to monoglutamate in the intestinal wall. This passes via the portal vein to the liver where it is first transformed into dihydrofolate, then tetrahydrofolate and finally into 5-10-MTHF. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme reduces the latter to 5-MTHF. Thanks to enterohepatic circulation, 5-MTHF returns to the small intestine and, after absorption, is distributed to the tissues.

In uraemia, experimental and clinical data suggest the presence of plasma inhibitors that limit the activity of the conjugases responsible for transforming polyglutamates into monoglutamates [23] and for transmembrane transport of folic acid [24]. Although fragmentary, these data suggest that both oral and intravenous treatment with active metabolites of folic acid should be more effective than the use of folic acid itself. However, the use of the active forms of folic acid (5-MTHF and folinic acid) was no more efficient than folic acid in lowering plasma homocysteine concentrations [25–28].

The type of folic acid seems instead to be important in terms of endothelial function. In contrast with some studies [14,29,30] in which folic acid supplementation was ineffective in improving endothelial dysfunction in pre-dialysis, haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, we found a beneficial effect of metabolically active form of folic acid 5-MTHF in improving endothelial-dependent vasodilatation either in haemodialysis patients [15] or, now, in peritoneal dialysis patients: the use of 5-MTHF instead of folic acid could be responsible for the difference. Further studies will clarify this beneficial effect.

In uraemic patients, 5-MTHF could be the treatment of choice because beyond the lowering effect on homocysteine plasma levels, its peculiar methyl and hydrogen donation capability makes it a dual source for stabilization of the tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) cofactor for the eNOS reaction with the additional function of being a local endothelial microenvironment antioxidant without affecting other parameters of oxidative stress, such as conjugated dienes.

Similar to tetrahydrobiopterin, 5-MTHF has been suggested to improve endothelial dysfunction directly interacting with NOS, promoting NO production [31]. It would supply the hydrogen and electrons to stabilize the requisite BH4 cofactor to run the eNOS reaction, resulting in the production of eNO and a decreased production of peroxynitrite by the endothelium [32] and could improve the electrotonically endothelium-dependent vasodilatation [33]. Restoration of the eNOS reaction by 5-MTHF supplementation has been demonstrated acutely by FMD studies in type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease via mechanisms, which are largely independent of homocysteine lowering [34,35]. Improvement of oxidative stress by normalizing folic acid plasma levels could explain the beneficial effect of folic acid administration observed in numerous studies, while the reduction in homocysteine plasma levels should be considered as an efficacy marker of the ongoing treatment.

Cardiovascular mortality is still elevated in uraemic patients and it is related to oxidative stress and inflammation. Further trials to study the effect of folic acid in reducing cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients, should take into account the prevalent effect of malnutrition on hyperhomocysteinaemia, and the type of folic acid metabolite administered.



   Acknowledgement
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
We are extremely grateful to The Association For the Prevention of Kidney Diseases (ASPREMARE) for its valuable financial support.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared



   References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 

  1. Moat SJ, Doshi SN, Lang D, McDowell IF, Lewis MJ, Goodfellow J. Treatment of coronary heart disease with folic acid: is there a future? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2004) 287:H1–H7.[Free Full Text]
  2. Francis ME, Eggers PW, Hostetter TH, Briggs JP. Association between serum homocysteine and markers of impaired kidney function in adults in the United States. Kidney Int (2004) 66:303–312.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Moustapha A, Naso A, Nahlawi M, et al. Prospective study of hyperhomocysteinemia as an adverse cardiovascular risk factor in end-stage renal disease. Circulation (1998) 97:138–141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bostom AG, Shemin D, Verhoef P, et al. Elevated fasting total plasma homocysteine levels and cardiovascular disease outcomes in maintenance dialysis patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (1997) 17:2554–2558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mallamaci F, Zoccali C, Tripepi G, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia predicts cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int (2002) 61:609–614.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Buccianti G, Baragetti I, Bamonti F, Furiani S, Dorighet V, Patrosso C. Plasma homocysteine levels and cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol (2004) 17:405–410.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Wrone EM, Hornberger JM, Zehnder JL, McCann LM, Coplon NS, Fortmann SP. Randomized trial of folic acid for the prevention of cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol (2004) 15:420–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, McAllister CJ, Kopple JD. A low rather than a high, total plasma homocysteine is an indicator of poor outcome in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol (2004) 15:442–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Usui M, Matsuoka H, Miyazaki H, Ueda S, Okuda S, Imaizumi T. Endothelial dysfunction by acute hyperhomocystein (e) mia: restoration by folic acid. Clin Sci (1999) 96:235–239.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Bellamy MF, McDowell IF, Ramsey MW, Brownlee M, Newcombe RG, Lewis MJ. Oral folate enhances endothelial function in hyperhomocysteinaemic subjects. Eur J Clin Invest (1999) 29:659–662.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Verhaar MC, Wever RM, Kastelein JJ, et al. Effect of oral folic acid supplementation on endothelial function in familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized-placebo controlled trial. Circulation (1999) 100:335–338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Title LM, Cummings PM, Giddens K, Genest JJ Jr, Nassar BA. Effect of folic acid and antioxidant vitamins on endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol (2000) 36:758–765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kunz K, Petitjean P, Lisri M, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and endothelial dysfunction in chronic haemodialysis patients: is homocyst(e)ine the missing link? Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14:1934–1942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. van Guldener C, Janssen MJ, Lambert J, Ter Wee PM, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Folic acid treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: no change in endothelial function after long-term therapy. Perit Dial Int (1998) 18:282–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Buccianti G, Raselli S, Baragetti I, et al. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate restores endothelial function in uremic patients on convective haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17:857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Arnadottir M, Gudnason V, Hultberg B. Treatment with different doses of folic acid in haemodialysis patients: effects on folate distribution and aminothiol concentrations. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15:524–528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jiang X, Yang F, Tan H, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia impairs endothelial function and eNOS activity via PKC activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2005) 25:2515–2521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Suliman ME, Barany P, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P. Homocysteine in uremia—a puzzling and conflicting story. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2005) 20:16–21.[Free Full Text]
  19. Wrone EM, Hornberger JM, Zehnder JL, McCann LM, Coplon NS, Fortmann SP. Randomized trial of folic acid for prevention of cardiovascular events in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol (2004) 15:420–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zoungas S, McGrath BP, Branley P, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Atherosclerosis and Folic Acid Supplementation Trial (ASFAST) in chronic renal failure: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 47:1108–1116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Loscalzo J. Homocysteine trials—clear outcomes for complex reasons. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:1629–1632.[Free Full Text]
  22. Righetti M, Serbelloni P, Milani S, Ferrario GM. Homocysteine-lowering vitamin B treatment decreases cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif (2006) 24:379–386.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Livant EJ, Tamura T, Johnston KE. Plasma folate conjugase activities and folate concentrations in patients receiving hemodialysis. J Nutr Biochem (1994) 5:504–508.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  24. Jennette JC, Goldman D. Inhibition of the membrane transport of folates by anions retained in uremia. J Lab Clin Med (1975) 86:834–843.[Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Bostom AG, Shemin D, Bagley P, et al. Controlled comparison of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate versus folic acid for the treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients. Circulation (2000) 101:2829–2832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yango A, Shemin D, Hsu N, et al. Rapid communication: L-folinic acid versus folic acid for the treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int (2001) 59:324–327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Hauser AC, Hagen W, Rehak PH, et al. Efficacy of folinic versus folic acid for the correction of hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis (2001) 37:758–765.[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Ducloux D, Aboubakr A, Motte G, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia therapy in haemodialysis patients: folinic versus folic acid in combination with vitamin B6 and B12. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17:865–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. van Guldener C, Janssen MJ, Lambert J, ter Wee PM, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Folic acid treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: no change in endothelial function after long-term therapy. Perit Dial Int (1998) 18:282–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Thambyrajah J, Landray MJ, McGlynn FJ, Jones HJ, Wheeler DC, Townend J. Does folic acid decrease plasma homocysteine and improve endothelial function in patients with predialysis renal failure? Circulation (2000) 102:871–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hyndman ME, Verma S, Rosenfeld RJ, Anderson TJ, Parsons HG. Interaction of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and tetrahydrobiopterin on endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2002) 282:H2167–H2172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Antoniades C, Shirodaria C, Werrick N, et al. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate rapidly improves endothelial function and decreases superoxide production in human vessels: effects on vascular tetrahydrobiopterin availability and endothelial nitric oxide synthase coupling. Circulation (2006) 114:1193–1201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Griffith TM, Chaytor AT, Bakker LM, Edwards DH. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and tetrahydrobiopterin can modulate electrotonically mediated endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2005) 102:7008–7013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. van Etten RW, de Koning EJ, Verhaar MC, Gaillard CA, Rabelink TJ. Impaired NO-dependent vasodilation in patients with type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is restored by acute administration of folate. Diabetologia (2002) 45:1004–1010.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Doshi SN, McDowell IF, Moat SJ, et al. Folic acid improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease via mechanisms largely independent of homocysteine lowering. Circulation (2002) 105:22–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication: 13.12.06
Accepted in revised form: 29. 5.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Antoniades, C. Shirodaria, P. Leeson, O. A. Baarholm, T. Van-Assche, C. Cunnington, R. Pillai, C. Ratnatunga, D. Tousoulis, C. Stefanadis, et al.
MTHFR 677 C>T Polymorphism Reveals Functional Importance for 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate, Not Homocysteine, in Regulation of Vascular Redox State and Endothelial Function in Human Atherosclerosis
Circulation, May 12, 2009; 119(18): 2507 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/3292    most recent
gfm402v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baragetti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Buccianti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baragetti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Buccianti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?