Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(9):2642-2643; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl285
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2642    most recent
gfl285v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakraverty, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakraverty, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Technical Note

Shortening peel-away sheaths prior to dialysis line insertion—potential decrease of patient risk

Rajesh Bhat1, Alison Severn2 and Sam Chakraverty1

1 Department of Radiology and 2 Renal Unit, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD19SY, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rajesh Bhat, Departments of Radiology and Renal Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD19SY, UK. Email: raj.bhat{at}tuht.scot.nhs.uk

Keywords: peel-away sheath; tunnelled dialysis line

Placement of tunnelled dialysis lines is effective using ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance [1] and has a higher success rate than ‘blind’ insertion [2].

After the ultrasound guided access into a neck vein, wires and catheters are guided in to a suitable position in the venous system. After dilatation, a 16F peel-away sheath is introduced. A dual-lumen dialysis catheter is tunnelled from an appropriate skin entry site and inserted through the peel-away sheath. The sheath is then split and removed by peeling it away.

The 16F or similar sized sheath, available from a variety of manufacturers, is ~17 cm long and placed together with a rigid dilator of similar size (Figure 1). This means the peel-away sheath assembly is usually inserted well into the heart. When left-sided access is used, there is the potential for wall trauma at the confluence of the left brachiocephalic vein and superior vena cava. In this and other units, we have seen morbidity and mortality due to venous and cardiac perforation during instrumentation.


Figure 1
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. 16F sheath which is 17 cm long.

 
The venous insertion site is usually only 1–3 cm from the skin access site. In principle, the peel-away sheath system need not be any longer than this, as venous access is maintained after removal of the wire and dilator. This point was made by Nixon in a letter to the Br Med J [3]. We have started to cut the peel-away sheath to half its length (8 cm) (Figure 2) Once the dilator part of the assembly is a few centimetres in (Figure 3), the shortened peel-away sheath can be advanced over the dilator into the vein while holding the dilator steady (Figure 4). The dilator is removed and the dialysis line inserted as normal. There is therefore no intra-cardiac insertion of the stiff peel-away sheath/dilator assembly, minimizing the risk of cardiac trauma.


Figure 2
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. The sheath is cut to half its size.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. Dilator is inserted to half its length into the vein.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. The shortened sheath is then advanced over the dilator.

 
Insertion of right internal jugular lines is straightforward using this technique. For left internal jugular insertion, this method avoids the kinking of the peel-away sheath that can occur at the left brachiocephalic–superior vena cava junction after the removal of the wire and dilator prior to line insertion. Occasionally, a left-sided line is malpositioned with this technique e.g. entering the right brachiocephalic vein, or being doubled up within the left brachiocephalic vein. However, repositioning is rapid and straightforward, using standard interventional radiology techniques during the same procedure.

In common with the experience reported by Nixon [3], we have had little response from the manufacturers of these devices about making shorter peel-away sheaths available. In the meantime, however, this adjustment to the available equipment is straightforward and contributes to the limitation of patient risk.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.



   References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Ewing F, Patel D, Petherick A et al. Radiological placement of the AshSplit haemodialysis catheter: a prospective analysis of outcome and complications. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 614–619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Teichgraber UK, Benter T, Gebel M, Manns MPA. Sonographically guided technique for central venous access. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 731–733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nixon SJ. Death after inserting Hickman line was probably avoidable (letter). Br Med J 2002; 324: 739[Free Full Text]
Received for publication: 31.10.05
Accepted in revised form: 27. 4.06


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2642    most recent
gfl285v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakraverty, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhat, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakraverty, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?