Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(7):2031-2033; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl020
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/2031-a    most recent
gfl020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosa-Diez, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by García-Mónaco, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosa-Diez, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by García-Mónaco, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Letter

Transhepatic venous access as an alternative for Tesio catheter in the case of a patient on haemodialysis with antiphospholipid syndrome

Email: grosadiez{at}yahoo.com; guillermo.rosadiez{at}hospitalitaliano.org.ar

Sir,

We report on a case of a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome with exhaustion of vascular accesses for haemodialysis. The transhepatic route through the suprahepatic vein was used to place a tunnelled catheter for permanent haemodialysis without complications and with an excellent permeability rate.

A 54-year-old woman with end stage renal failure of unknown origin, on haemodialysis since April 1991 and who had had numerous permanent vascular accesses which were lost due to thrombosis, required the placement of double-lumen, transitory catheters on several occasions. The patient began peritoneal dialysis, but it was interrupted two years later, due to multiple peritonitis episodes which caused the loss of the peritoneal membrane. She, therefore, had to restart haemodialysis. Clinical and laboratory tests performed on the patient led to the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome [1]. The angiographic test showed thrombosis in both subclavian veins and compromised both femoral and iliac veins (Figure 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Main accesses thrombosis: (A) Jugular and subclavian veins thrombosis with collateral circulation. Thrombosed Stent in right subclavian vein (white arrow). (B) Femoral and iliac veins thrombosis (white arrows) with collateral sacral circulation (black arrow).

 
A Tesio haemodialysis catheter (27 cm in length) was inserted at the suprahepatic vein level, leaving its distal end in the right atrium and making a subcutaneous tunnelling in the middle axillary region (Figure 2). The procedure was well tolerated by the patient and complications were not observed. Anticoagulation was started after 24 h with enoxiparine dose of 30 mg/day, labelled according to the anti-Xa specific activity. From the beginning, this approach achieved an effective blood flow of 300 ml/min. There are as yet no complications with this access.


Figure 2
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Tesio catheter placed in right suprahepatic vein. Angiographic control of the first Tesio branch (A) and second branch (B).

 
Eleven years after the beginning the renal replacement therapy, it was necessary to look for a new alternative venous access such as the suprahepatic vein. The selection of this route over the translumbar was based on our previous experience with the approach of the suprahepatic vein.

The transhepatic venous access as a catheter placement site has been known for many years, not only for dialysis but also for chronic parenteral nutrition [2,3].

It is a safe and simple route for venous access with complications and infections, comparable with other places of venous access. Although others suggest that the direct translumbar access is a better alternative [4], to date our patient maintains an excellent primary permeability, with an effective functioning for haemodialysis 980 days after the placement of the catheter. The excellent permeability rate can probably be explained by the combination of a suitable anticoagulation, our experience with this unconventional route and the type of catheter used [5].

The transhepatic venous access under ultrasound and radioscopic guidance is a simple and safe method. It is an acceptable alternative for permanent haemodialysis catheters when other venous accesses are exhausted, and when it is performed by a well-trained team.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Guillermo J. Rosa-Diez1, Roberto G. Lambertini2, Oscar- Peralta2, Luis H. Diodato3, Salomón L. Algranati1 and Ricardo D. García-Mónaco2

Deparments of1 Nefrologia FME2 Diagnóstico por Imágenes3 Cirugía Cardiovascular Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

References

  1. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T et al. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1309[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Stavropoulus S, Pan J, Clark T et al. Percutaneous transhepatic venous access for haemodialysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 1187–1190[Medline]
  3. De Csepel J, Stanley P, Padua E et al. Maintaining long term central venous access by repetitive hepatic vein cannulation. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 56–57[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Smith TP, Ryan JM, Reddan DN. Transhepatic catheter access for haemodialysis. Radiology 2004; 232: 246–251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wivell W, Bettmann M, Baxter B et al. Outcomes and perfomance of the Tesio twin catheter system placed for haemodialysis access. Radiology 2001; 221: 697–703[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/2031-a    most recent
gfl020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosa-Diez, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by García-Mónaco, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosa-Diez, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by García-Mónaco, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?