NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 15, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(5):1453-1454; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi330
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Survival and infection rates of a polyurethane vascular access graft compared to tunnelled dialysis catheters and brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas
Email: abmw100{at}doctors.org.ukSir,
The polyurethane graft can be used within 24 h and has improved haemostasis after cannulation [1,2]. It may be an alternative to central venous catheters in situations where urgent access is needed and native arteriovenous fistulas sites have been exhausted. We performed a retrospective review of all polyurethane grafts, all brachiobasilic fistulas (BBAVF) and age- and sex-matched controls with a tunnelled central venous access catheter (CVC) in a 27 month period. Patency, defined as dialysis-days, was analysed using life-table analysis methods.
|
Results. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, diabetes and causes of renal failure. Six out of 21 BBAVF (29%) failed to mature. Patency of the polyurethane grafts, CVC and BBAVFs were similar (log-rank test
2 = 0.34; P = 0.84). The overall infection rate in the CVC group and the graft group was similar. More than half of the infections occurred in only five leg grafts. This was significantly higher than in the arm (
2 = 4.7; P = 0.03). No serious infection, requiring ligation of the fistula, was seen in the BBAVF group. The polyurethane graft is an alternative to the tunnelled CVC in patients who need urgent dialysis access when the options for simple arteriovenous fistulas are exhausted. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
1 Department of Vascular Surgery2 Department of Renal Medicine Birmingham Heartlands Hospital Birmingham UK
References
- Glickman MH, Stokes GK, Ross JR et al. Multicenter evaluation of a polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft as compared with the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft in hemodialysis applications. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 465473[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Peng CW, Tan SG. Polyurethane grafts: a viable alternative for dialysis arteriovenous access? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2003; 11: 314318
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
