NDT Advance Access originally published online on September 8, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(11):3048-3051; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl411
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmas and surprises about the renin–angiotensin system and sodium reabsorption*
Deptartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Branko Braam, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension – F03.223, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: bbraam{at}gmail.com
Keywords: glomerulotubular balance; proximal tubule; RAS; sodium handling; tubuloglomerular feedback
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction The classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
After many years of studies on the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), one of the central concepts is that the RAS forms an effective defence mechanism against low-sodium states and hypotension. Low-perfusion pressure sensed by the afferent arteriole, low-distal delivery sensed by the macula densa and low blood pressure sensed by the sympathetic nervous system increase renin release, leading to angiotensin generation and sodium retention, vasoconstriction and restoration of blood pressure. About 15 years ago, the first reports appeared indicating angiotensin concentrations in the proximal tubule of higher magnitude than in the plasma [1,2]. Attempts to relate intraluminal angiotensin II (Ang II) concentrations to the functionality ascribed to the RAS were not very successful: the intratubular system did not seem to be adapting synchronously with the systemic RAS. What is the matter here? Is there a local RAS that acts independently from the systemic RAS? What would be the physiological relevance? In a recent article, Thomson et al. [3] explore the possibility that the local proximal tubular RAS functions in an opposite fashion to the systemic RAS: salt loading increased proximal tubular Ang II levels and sodium reabsorption. In this commentary, we attempt to place these recent findings in perspective with previous studies on the systemic and local RAS.
|
The classical view: the RAS is a sodium-retaining mechanism |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Infusion of Ang II to humans and animals leads to sodium retention [4–6]. In vivo micropuncture and microperfusion studies [7,8] have confirmed that Ang II can strongly enhance proximal tubular reabsorption. Stimulation of proximal reabsorption by Ang II diminishes distal delivery; this would deactivate the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system and consequently would increase GFR and filtered load. Ang II also enhances the responsiveness of the TGF system and, therefore, actions of Ang II on proximal reabsorption and the TGF system are synergistic and permit a decrease in distal delivery [9]. Translated to a clinical situation, a decrease in blood pressure will lead to RAS activation, enhanced proximal tubular reabsorption and a decrease in sodium excretion.
|
The proximal tubular angiotensin system; what do we know? |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
In 1990, the first report appeared that proximal tubular concentrations of Ang II were much higher than plasma concentrations [2]. We have confirmed and expanded these findings: when artificial tubular fluid is infused into the early proximal tubule, and collected downstream, the Ang II concentration is extremely high, in the nanomolar range [1], suggesting proximal tubular secretion of Ang II. Since then, similarly high intraluminal Ang II concentrations have been published in Ang II-infused hypertensive rats [10] and in one-clip, two-kidney Goldblatt hypertensive rats [11]. Interestingly, we failed to demonstrate diminished proximal tubular Ang II levels during volume expansion [12]. Reduced renal perfusion pressure, however, resulted in a parallel increase in systemic and proximal tubular Ang II levels [12]. In these studies, we failed to demonstrate a decrease in proximal tubular Ang II concentrations upon intraluminal angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor administration [1] and failed to show diminished maximum TGF responses upon intraluminal administration of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan [13]. Renin, albeit in low concentrations, and angiotensinogen message have demonstrated in proximal tubular cells [14]. The brush border contains ACE and angiotensinogen and Ang I concentrations are also high in the proximal tubular fluid [15–17]. AT1 receptors have been described on both the luminal and basolateral membranes [18]. Thus, the proximal tubule contains all the components of the RAS and could thus function in a paracrine fashion.
|
The surprise: sodium loading in rat increases intratubular Ang II levels and is associated with maintained Ang II-dependency of proximal tubular reabsorption |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Recently, Thomson et al. [3] investigated the long-held hypothesis that the RAS contributes to sodium retention. Male Wistar rats were maintained on a regular diet or a 1% NaCl high-salt diet for 7 days. Proximal tubular reabsorption was assessed prior to and following acute, intravenous administration of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (10 mg/k i.v.). Using micropuncture, late proximal tubular fluid flow was measured during a deactivated (zero perfusion of the loop of Henle) or a fully activated TGF system, to obtain variations in single nephron GFR (SNGFR). During a fully deactivated system, the TGF system dilates the afferent arteriole and maximizes SNGFR, while during full activation of the system, SNGFR is decreased. SNGFR and late proximal tubule flow were assessed prior to and following losartan administration, and plasma, kidney and proximal tubular Ang II concentrations assessed using radio-immunoassay. The key observations were that: (i) a high-salt diet increased GFR and proximal tubular sodium reabsorption, (ii) the TGF response was not suppressed by the high-sodium diet, (iii) losartan decreased proximal tubular sodium reabsorption to the same extent in sodium depleted and replete animals and (iv) sodium loading decreased plasma and kidney Ang II levels, but increased proximal tubular Ang II levels [3]. The authors’ view is that Ang II, by enhancing proximal tubular reabsorption during the sodium-replete state and the associated higher GFR, stabilizes the sodium load to the macula densa. This is further illustrated in Figure 1A: at any SNGFR, Ang II blockade results in an increase in late proximal flow, irrespective of the sodium diet. It is not of note that when GFR is higher, absolute reabsorption is higher (as will be excretion), which is glomerulotubular balance. What is noteworthy, however, is that proximal tubular reabsorption remains so dependent on Ang II.
|
There are some methodological issues that can be raised to question the approach. One is that blood pressure changes accompanied the changes in proximal reabsorption; still, when related to the blood pressure changes, the change in fractional proximal reabsorption was not different between normal and sodium-loaded animals (Figure 1B) while plasma Ang II levels were significantly decreased. Second, no early distal tubular fluid collections were performed. Acute ACE inhibition in humans on a low-, intermediate- and high-sodium diet suppressed plasma Ang II levels in all three groups, and increased fractional sodium excretion in subjects on low and medium salt intake [19]. Interestingly, urinary sodium concentration increased after ACE inhibition, indicating actions of Ang II beyond the proximal tubule in the diluting segment. Unfortunately, Thomson et al. [3] did not report urinary sodium concentration or excretion. A third concern would be that the salt loading was not very rigorous.
|
What could be the physiological implication of a local and a systemic RAS with opposing functions? |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
The researchers propose that an additional mechanism operates to stabilize distal delivery, on top of glomerulotubular balance and the TGF system (Figure 2). In this way, the adaptation of the proximal tubular angiotensin system will prevent an increase in distal delivery by sodium loading, even when the function of the TGF system is attenuated. What would be the physiological meaning of such a mechanism? The mechanism will not interfere with regaining overall sodium balance after a change in sodium intake. However, the compartmentalized, proximal tubular Ang II system would change the time frame in which balance is regained after a change in sodium intake: by maintaining high-proximal tubular reabsorption, the mechanism will oppose the other systems that aim to excrete that sodium load, and delay the moment at which balance is regained. Teleology could help to find a function for this mechanism: if environmental circumstances are such that there is incidental food (and sodium) available, it would not be logical to immediately excrete such a sodium load. Strauss et al. [20] observed that a normal individual, in balance on a very low-sodium intake, responds to administration of a small amount of sodium with natriuresis within hours. However, if more sodium is ‘squeezed’ out, by means of a diuretic or excessive sweating, administered sodium is retained quantitatively until this additional amount is replaced, after which any further sodium administered is treated as surplus to the body, i.e. excreted. The concept that Thomsom et al. [3] propose would be compatible, despite the fact that a time frame of a week of sodium loading is too long to remain in a sodium-depleted state.
|
It should be mentioned that we demonstrated that during a decrease in renal perfusion pressure, intraluminal Ang II increases in parallel to the systemic and whole kidney levels. Thus, the intraluminal system seems to be able to respond both parallel and opposite, depending on the exact stimulus. It would be interesting to study how different levels of sodium intake affect the luminal Ang II levels, and, conversely, how Ang II inhibition affects the time course of excretion of a sodium load.
|
What implications could be envisioned of the intratubular Ang II system for clinical syndromes? |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Given the activation of the systemic RAS during sodium depletion, ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonists are widely believed to have more consequences in low, than in high-salt states. The presented scheme would indicate that in sodium-replete states, such as volume-mediated hypertension, the (adult) nephrotic syndrome and diabetic nephropathy, Ang II blockade would also be effective for volume regulation. Indeed, high-glucose levels have been shown to stimulate angiotensinogen gene expression in proximal tubular cells [21], and proximal tubular renin expression was enhanced in streptozotocin-induced experimental diabetes mellitus in vivo [22]. Similarly, intraluminal Ang II levels have been reported to be increased in experimental hypertension, as noted earlier. One can only speculate on other clinical states such as the nephrotic syndrome; this remains to be investigated.
|
Conclusions |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Taken together, the recent report by Thomson and other data indicate that during a high-sodium intake, proximal intraluminal Ang II does not function in parallel to the systemic RAS and may even function in an opposite fashion. The proximal tubular renin–angiotensin system could thus act to stabilize distal delivery in the face of GFR increases upon sodium loading (in the present study even up to 20%). The high GFR in this situation may be meant to adapt to a high-caloric intake. Although this needs still to be unraveled, such a mechanism would at least allow GFR changes, i.e. upon changes in caloric intake, and leave delivery to the fine-tuning, low-capacity distal tubular mechanisms stable. With currently available information, the proximal tubular system seems to act in parallel with the systemic RAS during strong sodium depletion and/or low blood pressure, but opposite during exaggerated sodium intake. The suggestion here may be that this system serves sodium preservation during low-sodium conditions, and serves metabolic adaptation during high-sodium states.
|
Notes |
|---|
* Comment on Thomson SC, Deng A, Wead L, Richter K, Blantz RC, Vallon V. An unexpected role for angiotensin II in the link between dietary salt and proximal reabsorption. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 1110–1116.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe classical view: the...The proximal tubular angiotensin...The surprise: sodium loading...What could be the...What implications could be...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
- Braam B, Mitchell KD, Fox J, Navar LG. (1993) Proximal tubular secretion of angiotensin II in rats. Am J Physiol 264:F891–F898.
- Seikaly MG, Arant BS Jr, Seney FD Jr. (1990) Endogenous angiotensin concentrations in specific intrarenal fluid compartments of the rat. J Clin Invest 86:1352–1357.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Thomson SC, Deng A, Wead L, Richter K, Blantz RC, Vallon V. (2006) An unexpected role for angiotensin II in the link between dietary salt and proximal reabsorption. J Clin Invest 116:1110–1116.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Johnson MD and Malvin RL. (1977) Stimulation of renal sodium reabsorption by angiotensin II. Am J Physiol 232:F298–F306.
- Olsen ME, Hall JE, Montani JP, Guyton AC, Langford HG, Cornell JE. (1985) Mechanisms of angiotensin II natriuresis and antinatriuresis. Am J Physiol 249:F299–F307.[Medline]
- Vos PF, Koomans HA, Boer P, Dorhout Mees EJ. (1992) Effects of angiotensin II on renal sodium handling and diluting capacity in man pretreated with high-salt diet and enalapril. Nephrol Dial Transplant 7:991–996.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Liu FY and Cogan MG. (1988) Angiotensin II stimulation of hydrogen ion secretion in the rat early proximal tubule. Modes of action, mechanism, and kinetics. J Clin Invest 82:601–607.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Mitchell KD and Navar LG. (1987) Superficial nephron responses to peritubular capillary infusions of angiotensins I and II. Am J Physiol 252:F818–F824.
- Navar LG, Saccomani G, Mitchell KD. (1991) Synergistic intrarenal actions of angiotensin on tubular reabsorption and renal hemodynamics. Am J Hypertens 4:90–96.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Wang CT, Navar LG, Mitchell KD. (2003) Proximal tubular fluid angiotensin II levels in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 21:353–360.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Cervenka L, Wang CT, Mitchell KD, Navar LG. (1999) Proximal tubular angiotensin II levels and renal functional responses to AT1 receptor blockade in nonclipped kidneys of Goldblatt hypertensive rats. Hypertension 33:102–107.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Boer WH, Braam B, Fransen R, Boer P, Koomans HA. (1997) Effects of reduced renal perfusion pressure and acute volume expansion on proximal tubule and whole kidney angiotensin II content in the rat. Kidney Int 51:44–49.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Braam B and Koomans HA. (1995) Nitric oxide antagonizes the actions of angiotensin II to enhance tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness. Kidney Int 48:1406–1411.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Moe OW, Ujiie K, Star RA, et al. (1993) Renin expression in renal proximal tubule. J Clin Invest 91:774–779.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kobori H, Prieto-Carrasquero MC, Ozawa Y, Navar LG. (2004) AT1 receptor mediated augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Hypertension 43:1126–1132.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Navar LG, Lewis L, Hymel A, Braam B, Mitchell KD. (1994) Tubular fluid concentrations and kidney contents of angiotensins I and II in anesthetized rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1153–1158.[Abstract]
- Schunkert H, Ingelfinger JR, Jacob H, Jackson B, Bouyounes B, Dzau VJ. (1992) Reciprocal feedback regulation of kidney angiotensinogen and renin mRNA expressions by angiotensin II. Am J Physiol 263:E863–E869.[Medline]
- Harrison-Bernard LM, Navar LG, Ho MM, Vinson GP, el-Dahr SS. (1997) Immunohistochemical localization of ANG II AT1 receptor in adult rat kidney using a monoclonal antibody. Am J Physiol 273:F170–F177.
- Vos PF, Boer P, Koomans HA. (1993) Effects of enalapril on renal sodium handling in healthy subjects on low, intermediate, and high sodium intake. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 22:27–32.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Strauss MB, Lamdin E, Smith WP, Bleifer DJ. (1958) Surfeit and deficit of sodium; a kinetic concept of sodium excretion. AMA Arch Intern Med 102:527–536.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Zhang SL, To C, Chen X, et al. (2001) Effect of renin–angiotensin system blockade on the expression of the angiotensinogen gene and induction of hypertrophy in rat kidney proximal tubular cells. Exp Nephrol 9:109–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Zimpelmann J, Kumar D, Levine DZ, et al. (2000) Early diabetes mellitus stimulates proximal tubule renin mRNA expression in the rat. Kidney Int 58:2320–2330.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted in revised form: 7. 6.06
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. A. Cupples and B. Braam Assessment of renal autoregulation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): F1105 - F1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||