Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(10):2975-2978; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl372
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/10/2975    most recent
gfl372v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A worrying thought—could there be a connection between encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, tamoxifen and calciphylaxis?

Asher Korzets, Yaacov Ori, Dina Zevin, Avry Chagnac, Michal Herman, Benaya Rozen-Zvi and Uzi Gafter

Department of Nephrology, Hasharon Hospital-Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Prof. Uzi Gafter, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology, Hasharon Hospital-Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49372, Israel. Email: uzig{at}clalit.org.il

Keywords: calciphylaxis; dialysis; encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis; tamoxifen



   Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Case 1
 Case 2
 Discussion
 References
 
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a serious problem for chronically dialysed patients [1,2]. With an overall prevalence of ~2–3% in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), it is now obvious that extended duration of PD therapy increases the incidence and severity of EPS [3]. Mortality rates in patients with EPS remain high—especially after bowel obstruction becomes an overt problem, although success with intra-abdominal surgery is no longer a far-fetched option [2,4].

Pharmacological therapeutic choices are based on anecdotal evidence alone, but a combination of prednisone and tamoxifen has been used in an attempt to reduce both the inflammatory and fibrotic changes associated with this disease [2,5]. Tamoxifen was originally used in desmoid tumours, and since then the drug has proved to be of value in other fibroproliferative disorders, such as retroperitoneal fibrosis and Dupuytren's contracture [6]. However, tamoxifen produces oestrogenic-like effects on certain tissues, and can lead to an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism [7].

Over the last year, we treated two patients with advanced EPS, with prednisone and tamoxifen. Both developed overwhelming, and ultimately fatal, calciphylaxis. Their case reports follow, together with a discussion on the possible role of tamoxifen in initiating calciphylaxis—a condition characterized by the presence of intraluminal thrombi in small calcified blood vessels of the dermis [8]. Some precautionary measures that can be undertaken before commencing tamoxifen in patients with EPS are given.



   Case 1
 Top
 Introduction
 Case 1
 Case 2
 Discussion
 References
 
A 62-year-old man presented with a 4-month history of weight loss of ~10 kg, diffuse abdominal pain, intermittent vomiting and constipation. Relevant medical history included chronic renal disease secondary to focal glomerulosclerosis. A pre-emptive, living-related renal transplant was performed successfully in 1991. In 1999, B-cell gastric lymphoma was treated with a Billroth I partial gastrectomy, six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy and cessation of all immunosuppression. By late 1999, the patient's renal function had deteriorated to end-stage renal failure and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was initiated. Peritoneal dialysis was maintained for four consecutive years, until ultrafiltration failure became evident. In March 2003, haemodialysis was commenced.

The patient's above-mentioned symptoms started in early 2004, ~8 months after starting haemodialysis. Physical examination revealed ascites. Extensive investigations revealed: a normocytic anaemia, hypoalbuminaemia (~3.0 gm/dl), an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level: 20 mg/dl (normal: 0.0–0.8 mg/dl) and an exudative lymphocytic ascites, free of infection (including tuberculosis) and malignant cells. Gastroscopy revealed oesophagitis, with no evidence of lymphoma on multiple gastric biopsies. Colonoscopy was normal. Barium examination of the small bowel showed loops of the small bowel pushed high up into the right upper quadrant of the abdomen. Transit time of the barium throughout the small bowel was obviously slow. Computerized tomography (CT) of the abdomen was compatible with a diagnosis of EPS, showing loculated ascites and areas of calcified peritoneum [9]. A CT of the abdomen, performed 15 months previously, showed no evidence of EPS. In July 2004, prednisone (0.5 mg/kg/day: 40 mg) and tamoxifen (40 mg/day) were started. Total parenteral nutrition was commenced in August 2004.

An initial response, with improvement of his vomiting and some weight gain, was soon overshadowed by a gradual clinical deterioration over the next 6 months. Problems at this stage included continuing weight loss, vomiting and recurrent episodes of intradialytic hypotension. Intra-abdominal surgery was considered, but rejected as a therapeutic option by reluctant surgeons. Painless hyperbilirubinaemia caused by extrinsic pressure on the biliary tree was treated, with partial success, by papillotomy.

In January 2005, the patient presented with pain over his penile head and a sterile urethral discharge. Within days, gangrene developed on the patient's penile head. ‘Tram-like’ calcification of the penile artery was seen on plain radiography. Despite a negative bone scan, the presumptive diagnosis was penile calciphylaxis. Debridement was contemplated, but not undertaken. Worsening pain was treated by narcotics. The patient refused parathyroidectomy (serum parathyroid hormone levels ~1200 pg/ml), and he eventually elected to cease dialysis. He died in February 2005.

On post-mortem, it was found that loops of bowel were bound together in a tight conglomerate. Thick sheets of fibrous tissue had completely covered and partially destroyed the bowel loops. The muscularis of both the vas deferens and the seminal vesicles were heavily calcified.



   Case 2
 Top
 Introduction
 Case 1
 Case 2
 Discussion
 References
 
A 51-year-old woman with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis ‘reached’ end-stage renal disease in 1982. The patient received two cadaveric renal transplants in 1982 and 1984. Both transplants were subsequently removed and the patient began CAPD in 1991. Although ultrafiltration failure was observed initially in 2003, the patient refused transfer to haemodialysis until late 2004. Other relevant medical points included iatrogrenic ligation of the left external iliac artery in 1984 and an extensive anterior wall myocardial infarction which resulted in left ventricular failure in 1999.

In February 2005, only a few months after starting haemodialysis, the patient started to complain of intermittent abdominal pain. In April 2005, a bloody ascite was drained for the first time. The ascitic fluid was bacteriologically sterile and contained no malignant cells. Consequently, repeated cultures for tuberculosis were also negative. An abdominal CT scan revealed loculated ascites throughout the peritoneal cavity, together with a calcified and thickened peritoneum. Previous CT examinations were unavailable. CRP was high—10 mg/dl. A diagnosis of encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis was made. In May, prednisone and tamoxifen were started at respective daily doses of 30 and 20 mg. Intradialytic parenteral nutrition was also commenced.

Transiently, improvements were seen in a number of laboratory parameters—including elevations in serum haemoglobin and cholesterol levels and a reduction in CRP. However, abdominal pain remained a constant problem and large volumes (~2 l) of bloody ascitic fluid was drained on three further occasions between May and September 2005. Absolute indications for explorative laparotomy were lacking.

In early September 2005, the patient presented with fever and small, painful ulcers over the anterior aspects of both calves. These ulcers had a necrotic centre and were exquisitely tender. CT of both calves showed calcified arteries and soft-tissue swelling of the subcutaneous fat. Necrotizing fasciitis and myositis were not seen. A three-phase bone scan revealed diffuse uptake in the left calf. Calciphylaxis was diagnosed. Empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotics were commenced. Although serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were ~550 pg/ml, vitamin D was stopped. Intravenous pamidronate was given four times over a 7-day period, but little improvement was seen.

Within weeks the leg ulcers confluented and new ulcers developed over two fingers in the patient's right hand. She became narcotic-dependent due to severe pain in both legs. A low-grade fever and hypotension did not respond to further antibiotic therapy, intravenous fluids or increased steroid dosages. Severe hypoalbuminaemia and an anaemia, resistant to all therapy, developed. In late October 2005, the patient died as a result of Gram-negative septicaemia. Requests for a post-mortem were refused.



   Discussion
 Top
 Introduction
 Case 1
 Case 2
 Discussion
 References
 
Tamoxifen citrate is a unique drug, exhibiting both selective oestrogen receptor modulating (SERM) effects and oestrogenic agonistic properties [10]. The drug is an adjuvant agent in treating and preventing breast carcinoma [10,11]. Oestrogen-receptor-negative patients with breast cancer can also benefit from tamoxifen therapy, probably as the drug can modulate the actions of transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) on a number of cell lines, including on cancerous breast cells [12].

TGFß plays a role in physiological tissue repair, but with repeated injury its sustained production leads to the development of extracellular matrix fibrosis [13]. Thereafter, it can induce cells within the extracellular matrix to produce more TGFß, thus leading to an amplification of chronic tissue fibrosis. Tamoxifen was first used in treating desmoid tumours, and thereafter in the treatment of other fibrotic diseases—most notably idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis [6]. In both conditions, the initial inflammatory lesion is soon overshadowed by the deposition of collagen in a dense, avascular and, sometimes, calcified mass. TGFß is one of many cytokines allegedly involved in the pathogenesis of EPS [14], but even before this became known, tamoxifen was used as a possible therapeutic option in EPS—an intra-abdominal inflammatory process which progresses to fibrosis with bowel obstruction, malnutrition and patient death.

Indeed, tamoxifen may benefit patients with EPS, especially if initiated in the early stage of the disease [2,5]. In 2003, del Peso et al. [5] showed that tamoxifen-treated patients with peritoneal sclerosis did not develop EPS. In their control group of 14 patients who did not receive tamoxifen, four went on to develop EPS—three of them died within 6 months. In 2005, Summers et al. [2] described their experience with 27 patients and EPS. Sixteen patients had severe disease requiring surgery, while the other 11 had a ‘milder’ form of EPS. In the group with severe disease, 5/16 patients received tamoxifen and two died. Eight of the 16 patients in this same group received no specific drug therapy. Five of these patients died. In the ‘mild’ EPS group, there was no difference in the patient outcome between those patients who did or did not receive tamoxifen [2]. All these 11 patients remain alive ~1.5–5 years after EPS diagnosis—nine of them on haemodialysis.

On a negative note, tamoxifen is associated with an increased number of deep venous thromboses and superficial thrombophlebitis. This occurs not only in post-menopausal women with breast cancer and in patients receiving combined tamoxifen and chemotherapy [10,15,16], but also in patients with breast carcinoma in full remission and in healthy women enrolled in preventive breast cancer trials [11,16]. The drug can reduce anti-coagulant protein levels, such as antithrombin III, protein C and protein S, and may cause excessive platelet aggregation [15,17,18]. Just recently, Cosman et al. [7] have also shown that tamoxifen is capable of increasing serum levels of factors VIII, IX and vWf—all being known procoagulant proteins [7].

Calciphylaxis occurs nearly exclusively in chronic dialysis patients [8,19]. After open and necrotic ulcers become evident, mortality rates are as high as 60% [19]. The histopathological findings in calciphylaxis are medial calcifications of the dermal arterioles and venules, intraluminal thromboses and surrounding soft tissue calcifications [8,19]. Essary et al. [8] found both venous and arteriolar microthrombi in ~25% of cases, often with luminal occlusion. Protein C and protein S deficiencies, acquired abnormalities seen with tamoxifen, have been documented in patients with calciphylaxis and have led some to believe that a thrombotic event superimposed on pre-existing vascular damage ultimately leads to tissue ischaemia and necrosis [20–22]. In 1990, Metha et al. [20] documented a significant reduction in the anticoagulant function of protein C in four dialysed women with calciphylaxis. Budisavijevic et al. [19] added a further eight patients in whom decreased protein C levels were associated with calciphylaxis. Protein S is a cofactor in normal protein C anticoagulant function, and low functional levels of protein S are found in chronic inflammatory processes—much like EPS [21]. Therefore, in the setting of overt and severe EPS with its resulting states of chronic inflammation, malnutrition and a systemic inflammatory response, the addition of tamoxifen may actually be detrimental—leading to the formation of small vessel thrombi, and ultimately to calciphylaxis if these thrombi are present in the skin vasculature [23].

In conclusion, we recommend caution when using tamoxifen in EPS. Firstly, monotherapy with corticosteriods seems to be effective [24]. Furthermore, in 2000, Kawanishi et al. [4] did not routinely use tamoxifen in their patients and even today in 2005, Japanese nephrologists argue that the therapeutic value of tamoxifen in EPS ‘remains unknown’. This is based on two relevant points: first—all reports of tamoxifen in EPS originate from either case reports or small, non-controlled studies, and second—tamoxifen was nearly always given together with corticosteroids [24]. If administered to patients, it should be started at an early stage of the disease, and at a daily dose of 20 mg [2,25], despite the fact that in retroperitoneal fibrosis, a daily dose of 40 mg has been used safely. In the late stages of the disease, when fibrotic changes in the peritoneum are well established, any possible therapeutic value of tamoxifen is unknown. Finally, measuring protein C and protein S levels and their functional activities prior to and during therapy is recommended. Treatment should be withheld in any patient with any deficiency in either of these proteins or in patients with another known hypercoaguable state, such as activated protein C resistance due to factor V Leiden—a common genetic defect in many white European families [15]. Just recently, Eltoum et al. [25] treated four EPS patients successfully with tamoxifen. However, one pulmonary embolus and two thrombosed arteriovenous accesses complicated the tamoxifen therapy [25]. In time, new antagonists of TGFß may help alleviate the problem of EPS [13], but even now, at least in one experimental model of peritoneal sclerosis, angiotensin II blockade can reduce the expression of TGFß [14].

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.



   References
 Top
 Introduction
 Case 1
 Case 2
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Nakamoto H. (2005) Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis – a clinician's approach to diagnosis and medical treatment. Perit Dial Int 25 [Suppl 4]:S30–S38.
  2. Summers AM, Clancy MJ, Syed F, et al. (2005) Single-center experience of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients on peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int 68:2381–2388.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Rigby RJ and Hawley CM. (1998) Sclerosing peritonitis: the experience in Australia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:154–159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kawanishi H, Harada Y, Sakikubo E, et al. (2000) Surgical treatment for sclerosising encapsulating peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial 16:252–256.[Medline]
  5. del Peso G, Bajo MA, Gil F, et al. (2003) Clinical experience with tamoxifen in peritoneal fibrosing syndromes. Adv Perit Dial 19:32–35.[Medline]
  6. van Bommel EF, Hendriksz TR, Huiskes AW, Zeegers AG. (2006) Brief communication: tamoxifen therapy for nonmalignant retroperitoneal fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 144:101–106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cosman F, Baz-Hecht M, Cushman M, et al. (2005) Short-term effects of estrogen, tamoxifen and raloxifene on hemostasis: a randomized-controlled study and review of the literature. Thromb Res 116:1–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Essary LR and Wick MR. (2000) Cutaneous calciphylaxis. An underrecognized clinicopathologic entity. Am J Clin Pathol 113:280–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Korzets A and Korzets Z, et al. (1988) Sclerosing peritonitis. Possible early diagnosis by computerized tomography of the abdomen. Am J Nephrol 8:143–146.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Ragaz J and Coldman AJ. (1998) Survival impact of adjuvant tamoxifen on competing causes of mortality in breast cancer survivors, with analysis of mortality from contralateral breast cancer, cardiovascular events, endometrial cancer and thromboembolic episodes. J Clin Oncol 16:2018–2024.[Abstract]
  11. Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, et al. (2003) Overview of the main outcomes in breast cancer prevention trials. Lancet 361:296–300.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Benson JR, Wakefield LM, Baum M, Colletta AA. (1996) Synthesis and secretion of transforming growth factor beta isoforms by primary cultures of human breast tumor fibroblasts in vitro and their modulation by tamoxifen. Br J Cancer 74:352–358.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Border WA and Noble NA. (1994) Transforming growth factor ß in tissue fibrosis. New Engl J Med 331:1286–1292.[Free Full Text]
  14. Miyazaki M and Yuzawa Y. (2005) The role of peritoneal fibrosis in encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. Perit Dial Int 25 [Suppl 4]:S48–S56.
  15. Weitz IC, Israel VK, Liebman HA. (1996) Tamoxifen associated venous thrombosis and activated protein C resistance due to factor V Leiden. Cancer 79:2024–2027.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  16. Meier CR and Jick H. (1998) Tamoxifen and risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:608–612.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Cushman M, Costantino JP, Bovill EG, et al. (2003) Effect of tamoxifen on venous thrombosis risk factors in women without cancer: the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Br J Haematol 120:109–116.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Vitseva O, Flockhart DA, Jin Y, Varghese S, Freedman JE. (2005) The effects of tamoxifen and its metabolites on platelet function and release of reactive oxygen intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 312:1144–1150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Budisavijevic MN, Cheek D, Ploth DW. (1996) Calciphylaxis in chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:978–982.[Abstract]
  20. Metha RL, Scott G, Sloand JA, Francis CW. (1990) Skin necrosis associated with acquired protein C deficiency in patients with renal failure and calciphylaxis. Am J Med 88:252–257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Rostaing L, El Feki S, Delisle M-B, et al. (1995) Calciphylaxis in a chronic hemodialysis patient with protein S deficiency. Am J Nephrol 15:524–527.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Goldsmith DJA. (1997) Calciphylaxis, thrombotic diathesis and defects in coagulation regulation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12:1082–1083.[Free Full Text]
  23. Basic-Jukic N and Kes P. (2005) Does sclerosing peritonitis induce MIA syndrome and generalized sclerosis? Perit Dial Int 25:608–610.[Free Full Text]
  24. Kawaguchi Y, Saito A, Kawanishi H, et al. (2005) Recommendations on the management of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan, 2005: diagnosis, predictive markers, treatment and preventive measures. Perit Dial Int 25 [Suppl 4]:S83–S95.
  25. Eltoum MA, Wright S, Atchley J, Mason JC. (2006) Four consecutive cases of peritoneal dialysis-related encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis treated successfully with tamoxifen. Perit Dial Int 26:203–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication: 13. 2.06
Accepted in revised form: 29. 5.06


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
pdiHome page
S. Guest
TAMOXIFEN THERAPY FOR ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS: MECHANISM OF ACTION AND UPDATE ON CLINICAL EXPERIENCES
Perit. Dial. Int., May 1, 2009; 29(3): 252 - 255.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/10/2975    most recent
gfl372v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korzets, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gafter, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?