Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 26, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(10):2287-2288; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi031
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/2287-b    most recent
gfi031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summers, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Summers, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Letter

Haemodialysis catheter-associated infection: common pathogens in unusual places

Sir,

For many patients with ESRF intravenous catheters are an essential route of vascular access for haemodialysis treatment. In the United Kingdom such patients constitute up to 17% of the dialysis population [1]. In this context rare infectious diseases may be encountered in the dialysis unit. We describe two previously unreported infectious complications of tunnelled dialysis catheters.

Case 1. A 57-year-old man presented with ESRF due to diabetes mellitus. His peripheral vasculature was unsuitable for the creation of an arterio-venous fistula (AVF) or implantable graft. A tunnelled dialysis catheter (Double-lumen PermCath) was inserted and haemodialysis commenced. Two months later he was admitted with pyrexia, rigors and a marked inflammatory response. He also complained of pain at the left sterno-clavicular joint. Repeated blood cultures, from separate sites, grew Staphylococcus epidermidis. Spiral CT scanning demonstrated evidence of osteomyelitis and clavicular destruction. The catheter was removed and peritoneal dialysis commenced. Antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and rifampicin was continued for a 6 week period with resolution of symptoms and inflammatory markers.

Case 2. A 62-year-old Yemeni man presented to our emergency department with ESRF. Owing to symptomatic uraemia a tunnelled catheter was inserted and dialysis commenced. Three months later the patient developed high fevers, with raised inflammatory markers. Repeated blood cultures were negative. Despite replacement of the line and empirical antibiotic therapy he developed a shallow 4 cm ulcer at the catheter exit site. The catheter was removed, and the ulcer biopsied. The culture grew fully sensitive Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clinical and radiological assessment found no other sites of tuberculosis. After initiating treatment and replacing the catheter, the ulcer healed and the patient improved.

Discussion. Infection related to intravenous catheters remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients treated with chronic haemodialysis [2]. Osteomyelitis complicates up to 14% of these cases [3]. S. epidermidis is a common cause of bacteraemia in renal units [1]. In Case 1 we report sternoclavicular osteomyelitis—a previously unreported but serious complication of what is considered to be a benign infection [4]. The incidence of M. tuberculosis has increased by 11% nationally (over 5 years) and by 71% in London (over 10 years) [5]. Chronic renal failure is known to cause immune dysregulation and is a risk factor for developing active TB. However, there are no reports of M. tuberculosis causing catheter exit site infection in this or other patient groups. Despite advances in renal replacement therapy there is no intervention proven to improve the immune status of dialysis patients or mitigate the infection risks associated with long-tem catheters. AVFs remain the gold standard for dialysis access due to improved patient survival [6]. With increasing use of tunnelled lines in immunocompromised subjects unusual infections are likely to be a growing phenomenon in dialysis units.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Shaun Andrew Summers1, Ravi K. Gupta1, Elaine J. Clutterbuck1, Christopher Laing1 and Graeme S. Cooke2

1 Department of Renal Medicine Hammersmith Hospital Du Cane Road London, UK2 Department of Infectious Diseases Du Cane Road Hammersmith Hospital London, UK Email: shaunsummers{at}hotmail.com

References

  1. Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Bommer J et al. Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 108–120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dhingra RK, Young EW, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Leavey SF, Port FK. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1443–1451[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Kessler M, Hoen B, Mayeux D, Hestin D, Fontenaille C. Bacteraemia in patients on chronic haemodialyis: a multicenter prospective study. Nephron 1992; 64: 95–100
  4. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, Vol 39, no 10, Oct 2001, pp. 75–80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rose AM, Watson JM, Graham C et al. Public Health Laboratory Service/British Thoracic Society/Department of Health Collaborative Group. Tuberculosis at the end of the 20th century in England and Wales: results of a national survey in 1998. Thorax 2001; 56: 173–179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lorenzo V, Martn M, Rufino M, Hernandez D, Torres A, Ayus JC. Predialysis nephrologic care and a functioning arteriovenous fistula at entry are associated with better survival in incident hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 999–1007[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/2287-b    most recent
gfi031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summers, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Summers, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?