Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Almond, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Almond, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2680
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Letter and Reply

Aciclovir and valaciclovir neurotoxicity in patients with renal failure

Michael K. Almond

Renal Unit Southend Hospital Westcliff-on-Sea, UK Email: dralmond{at}cannonbury.demon.co.uk

Sir,

Helldén et al. [1] describe serious neurological adverse side effects during aciclovir (ACV) or valaciclovir (VACV) therapy in patients with renal failure and concluded that the determination of 9-carboxymethoxymethylguanine (CMMG) levels in serum may be a useful tool in supporting the diagnosis of ACV-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms. They went on to suggest pharmacokinetic studies were required to provide recommendations for dosing with ACV and VACV in renal failure.

Pharmacokinetic studies have been performed with ACV in oliguric patients on haemodialysis [2] and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) [3], and have been performed with VACV on patients on CAPD [4]. Recommendations in dose adjustment taking into account the degree of renal failure and the mode of dialysis have been made. The common conclusion from these studies is that the recommended dose reduction provided by the manufacturers is inadequate for patients in end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis and does not take into account drug removal on haemodialysis.

The dose reduction required may be more significant in oliguric patients than in those with non-oliguric renal failure given that the normal route of excretion (91%) is via urine. Helldén et al. do not include an estimation of urine volumes in their patients which may have confounded some of their data as simple extrapolation of ACV clearance according to creatinine clearance may not be valid.

Prevention of neurotoxicity by dose reduction and the ability of haemodialysis, by rapid drug removal, to help differentiate between symptoms of encephalitis and ACV toxicity [5], whilst simultaneously proving therapeutic is possibly a better strategy to adopt than measurement of CMMG, which may subsequently serve to act as a confirmatory test.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

References

  1. Helldén A, Odar-Cederlöf I, Diener P et al. High serum concentrations of the acyclovir main metabolite 9-carboxymethoxymethylguanine in renal failure patients with acyclovir-related neuropsychiatric side effects: an observational study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 1135–1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Almond MK, Fan S, Dhillon S, Pollock AM, Raftery MJ. Avoiding acyclovir neurotoxicity in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing haemodialysis. Nephron 1995; 69: 428–432[Medline]
  3. Stathoulopoulou F, Almond MK, Dhillon S, Raftery MJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral acyclovir in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 1996; 74: 337–341[Medline]
  4. Stathoulopoulou F, Dhillon S, Thodis H, Stathakis C, Vargemezis V. Evaluation of valaciclovir dosage reduction in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron 2002; 91: 164–166[Medline]
  5. Beales P, Almond MK, Kwan JT. Acyclovir neurotoxicity following oral therapy: prevention and treatment in patients on haemodialysis. Nephron 1994; 66: 362–363[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Almond, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Almond, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?