Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Meur, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux-Robert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Meur, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux-Robert, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 442
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Letters

The renal safety of high doses of valacyclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation

Yannick Le Meur, Sandrine Mons, Christian Moesch and Claude Leroux-Robert

Service de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Dupuytren, Limoges, France

Sir,

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after renal transplantation reduces morbidity during the first several months and may prevent some other serious associated diseases like opportunistic bacterial or fungal infections and graft rejection [1]. Different treatments are possible: human immunoglobulins, acyclovir and gancyclovir. Recently, it has been shown that valacyclovir was effective in decreasing the incidence of CMV disease especially in high-risk patients [2]. Valacyclovir is a prodrug which increases oral acyclovir bioavailability 3–5-fold. When high dosages (6–8 g/day) are used, oral intake of valacyclovir achieves plasma concentrations (area under the curve: AUC) comparable with those of intravenous (i.v.) acyclovir 10 mg/kg three times daily [3]. It is well known that i.v. acyclovir can cause crystal formation in renal tubules that can lead to acute renal failure [45]. About one third of patients experienced a transient increase in the serum creatinine level during i.v. acyclovir therapy [4]. This acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity is potentiated by cyclosporin [6]. The appearance of acyclovir crystalluria is considered to be a warning sign which precedes the rise of the serum creatinine level [7].

We investigated the frequency of crystalluria and the renal drug safety in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin in whom oral valacyclovir was used for the prevention of CMV disease. Six patients were enrolled in the study. All were CMV-seronegative patients transplanted with a graft from a CMV- seropositive donor. The immunosuppressive regimen was quadruple and sequential consisting of antithymocyte globulin for 6–8 days, associated with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Cyclosporin A was introduced 2 days before the antithymocyte globulin was discontinued.

Valacyclovir was started on the 3–7 day after transplantation at the dosage of 6 g/day if the creatinine clearance exceeded 50 ml/min or 4.5 g/day if the clearance was between 25 and 50 ml, and continued for 3 months. Because all patients had good renal function they were treated with 6 g of valacyclovir after 2 weeks of transplantation. Serum creatinine concentrations did not increase during treatment.

Granulocytes were analysed weekly for CMV antigen. During the first 3 months of valacyclovir treatment, the granulocyte test became positive in only one of the six patients, and this patient remained asymptomatic.

A search for urinary crystals was performed on fresh urine samples two times per week during the first month and once per week over the next 2 months using polarization microscopy. Acyclovir crystalluria was never detected in the six patients at any time during the 3 months of treatment.

We conclude that valacyclovir is effective and safe in the prevention of CMV disease in renal allograft recipients. The pharmacokinetic properties of this drug which has an AUC similar to that of i.v. acyclovir without a serum peak could account for the absence of crystalluria and deterioration of renal function. However, our preliminary findings, especially the absence of crystalluria, need to be confirmed in a larger series of patients.

References

  1. Kuypers DRJ, Vanrenterghem Y. Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 3012–3016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lowance D, Neumayer HH, Legendre CM, et al. Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1462–1470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Weller S, Blum MR, Doucette M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the acyclovir-produg valacyclovir after escalating single and multiple dose administration to normal volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 595–605[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bridgen D, Rosling AE, Woods NC. Renal function after acyclovir intravenous injection. Am J Med 1982; 73 [Suppl 1A]: 182–185[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Perazella MA. Crystal-induced acute renal failure. Am J Med 1999; 106: 459–465[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Berns JS, Cohen RM, Stumacher RJ, Rudnick MR. Renal aspects of therapy for human immunodeficiency virus and associated opportunistic infections. J Am Soc Nephrol 1991; 1: 1061–1080[Abstract]
  7. Fogazzi GB. Cristalluria: a neglected aspect of urinary sediment analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 379–387[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Ostermann, I. MacPhee, R. Chang, D. R. Kuypers, and Y. F. C. Vanrenterghem
Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2276 - 2279.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Meur, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux-Robert, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Meur, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Leroux-Robert, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?