Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(12):3731-3737; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn519
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/12/3731    most recent
gfn519v2
gfn519v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by London, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by London, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Biosimilars and biopharmaceuticals: what the nephrologists need to know—a position paper by the ERA-EDTA Council

Adrian Covic1, Jorge Cannata-Andia2, Giovanni Cancarini3, Rosanna Coppo4, João M. Frazão5, David Goldsmith6, Pierre Ronco7, Goce B. Spasovski8, Peter Stenvinkel9, Cengiz Utas10, Andrzej Wiecek11, Carmine Zoccali12 and Gerard London13

1 Dialysis and Transplantation Center, Dr. C.I. Parhon University Hospital, Iasi, Romania 2 Bone and Mineral Research Unit, Universidad de Oviedo, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain 3 Nephrology Department, Nephrology Institute, Brescia 4 Nephrology and Dialysis Department, Regina Margherita Hospital, Torino, Italy 5 Hospital S. João, Serviço de Nefrologia, Al. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal 6 Department of Nephrology, Guy's & St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK 7 Nephrology Department and INSERM Unit 702, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France 8 Department of Nephrology, Clinical Center Skopje, University of Skopje, F.Y.R. Macedonia 9 Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 10 Department of Nephrology, Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey 11 Department of Nephrology, Silesian School of Medicine, Katowice, Poland 12 CNR, Renal, Hypertension and Transplantation Unit, Ospedali Riuniti, Reggio Calabria, Italy 13 Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier, Mahnes, Fleury, France

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Adrian Covic, Dialysis and Transplantation Center, Dr. C.I. Parhon University Hospital, Carol 1st Blvd. Nr. 50, Iasi 700503, Romania. Tel: +40-721-280246; Fax: +40-232-211752; E-mail: acovic@xnet.ro

Keywords: biopharmaceuticals; biosimilars; ERA-EDTA position paper; pharmacovigilance

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.



   Introduction
 
Since January 2008, four biosimilars have been approved by EMEA: two human growth hormone analogues and two erythropoiesis-simulating agents (ESAs) (in five different branding versions). The ESAs were approved despite some differences from the comparator product in potency and consistency. For example (as shown in the official EMEA document), epoetin zeta (SB309) ‘provided evidence that a difference of 35.3 IU/kg/week in epoetin dose (worst case scenario) was clinically not relevant in the investigated study population, whether this difference was calculated as absolute value or as percentage of the reference dose (21%)’ [1]. At the same time, a biosimilar interferon product was rejected because of concerns about stability, impurities, validation of the manufacturing process and differences in outcomes and adverse effects [2].

In response to a letter from European Biopharmaceutical Enterprises (EBE) and concerns from the renal community, the ERA-EDTA Council meeting decided in Porto, during the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



   Definition, history and implications of biosimilars
 


   Challenges in pharmaceutical manufacturing with biological drugs
 


   Theoretical concerns with biosimilars
 
Glycosylation
Contamination
Changes to three-dimensional structure
Other causes


   EMEA guidelines
 
Pharmacodynamics studies
In vitro studies
In vivo animal studies
Toxicological studies
Clinical studies
Pharmacokinetic studies
Pharmacodynamic studies
Clinical efficacy studies
Clinical safety data


   Pharmacovigilance in the EU
 


   Automatic substitution and INN
 


   Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Jelkmann
Efficacy of recombinant erythropoietins: is there unity of international units?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1366 - 1368.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. C. Macdougall
Biosimilar epoetins
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1698 - 1699.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. M. Hoffman, N. D. Shah, L. C. Vermeulen, F. Doloresco, P. K. Martin, S. Blake, L. Matusiak, R. J. Hunkler, and G. T. Schumock
Projecting future drug expenditures--2009
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 1, 2009; 66(3): 237 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]