NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 16, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(7):1815-1819; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm224
© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Are we overestimating left ventricular abnormalities in end-stage renal disease?
Patrick B. Mark,
Rajan K. Patel and
Alan G. Jardine
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, Scotland, UK
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Patrick B. Mark, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, Scotland, UK. Email: p.mark@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Keywords: cardiomyopathy; dialysis; echocardiography magnetic resonance imaging; end stage renal failure; left ventricular hypertrophy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Uraemic cardiomyopathy, defined by the presence of left ventricular
hypertrophy (LVH), left ventricular (LV) dilatation or LV systolic
dysfunction (LVSD), is reported to be a predictor of premature
cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease
(ESRD) [1]. Each of these LV abnormalities cumulatively confers
a poorer long term prognosis [2]. LV function, dimensions and
geometry have conventionally been assessed by echocardiography.
Echocardiography is well established, portable and widely available
and therefore will remain a vital clinical tool. However, echocardiography
has drawbacks, including operator-dependence and difficulty
in obtaining satisfactory acoustic windows. A major technological
limitation of echocardiography is the geometric assumption required
to calculate LV mass and function. Using conventional M-mode
echocardiography to assess LV mass by the Penn [3] or ASE formulae
[4], ventricular dimensions are measured in the minor axis and
then volumes estimated from the cube of these values,
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Comparisons between echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of LV dimensions
|
|---|
 |
Uraemic cardiomyopathy as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
|
|---|
 |
Can CMR allow us to improve echocardiographic methods in patients with ESRD?
|
|---|
 |
Improvements to echocardiographic technique for assessment of left ventricular mass
|
|---|
 |
Limitations of CMR
|
|---|
 |
Implications for treatment of uraemic cardiomyopathy
|
|---|

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?