Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(5):1293-1296; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl830
© The Author
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Costimulation blockadewhat will the future bring?
Flavio Vincenti
University of California, San Francisco, Kidney Transplant Service, San Francisco, California
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Flavio Vincenti, MD, Professor of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Kidney Transplant Service, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Room 884M, San Francisco, CA 94143-0780. Email: vincentif@surgery.ucsf.edu
Keywords: belatacept; costimulation blockade; fusion receptor proteins
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The long and torturous road in the clinical development of costimulation
blockade came to fruition in 2005, with the approval of CTLA4Ig
(abatacept) for rheumatoid arthritis and the publication of
the promising results of the phase II trial in kidney transplantation
of belatacept (previously referred to as LEA29Y) [13].
Harnessing the therapeutic potential of costimulation blockade,
an essential signal for T-cell activation, has been the focus
of translational research for the past 25 years [1]. However,
the promising early results of either prolongation graft survival
or induction of tolerance using costimulation blockade in transplantation
experiments in rodents could not be reproduced in non-human
primates (NHP) [4,5]. While the discrepancies between the outcome
of transplantation in rodents and NHP treated with CTLA4Ig are
complex and multifactorial (i.e. differences in immune systems,
repertoire of memory T cells and environmental exposure), it
also became apparent
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Chronic protein therapya novel delivery of immunosuppression
|
|---|
 |
Costimulation blockade and T regulatory cells
|
|---|
 |
Conclusion
|
|---|
 |
Disclosure
|
|---|

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?