Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(2):266-270; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh571
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/266    most recent
gfh571v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cappelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Canaud, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cappelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Canaud, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 20 No. 2 © ERA–EDTA 2005; all rights reserved

Editorial Comment

Is biofilm a cause of silent chronic inflammation in haemodialysis patients? A fascinating working hypothesis

Gianni Cappelli1, Ciro Tetta2 and Bernard Canaud3

1 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, University of Modena, Modena, Italy, 2 Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany and 3 Nephrology and Renal Research and Training Institute, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Bernard Canaud, Nephrology, Lapeyronie University Hospital, CHU Montpellier, 371, Avenue du Doyen G. Giraud, 34925 Montpellier, France. Email: b-canaud@chu-montpellier.fr

Keywords: biofilm; chronic inflammation; C-reactive protein; haemodialysis adequacy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.



   Introduction
 
Knowledge of biofilm formation and its biological role in chronic subclinical inflammation has largely evolved over the past years [1–5]. The development of a biofilm is a very effective way for bacteria to survive facing hostile conditions and to resist biocides and antimicrobial substances. The initial event in biofilm formation is the adhesion of microbes to surfaces. The surface properties of medical devices are usually modified by a conditioning film of organic material. The effect of single blood proteins or of whole blood itself depends on bacterial strains. Fibrinogen and fibronectin both enhance Staphylococcus aureus binding and inhibit Staphylococcus epidermidis or Gram-negative bacteria adherence, while whole blood promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation [6].

Biofilm is not a static simple matrix made of homogeneous slime embedding bacteria. This sessile multicellular community is a dynamic complex system made of exopolysaccharide matrix embedding living microorganisms with a phenotype modified . . . [Full Text of this Article]



   Vascular access in haemodialysis patient
 


   Haemodialysis monitors
 


   Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Merino, S. Nogueras, T. Garcia-Maceira, M. Rodriguez, A. Martin-Malo, R. Ramirez, J. Carracedo, and P. Aljama
Bacterial DNA and endothelial damage in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3635 - 3642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Wanner, D. Richardson, D. Fouque, and P. Stenvinkel
OPTA--Influence of inflammation/infection on anaemia therapy in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(suppl_3): iii7 - iii12.
[Full Text] [PDF]