Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuypers, D. R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrenterghem, Y. F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuypers, D. R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrenterghem, Y. F. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 297-300
© ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Editorial Comments

Monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation: old and new

Dirk R. J. Kuypers and Yves F. C. Vanrenterghem

Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University of Leuven, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dirk Kuypers, Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Email: dirk.kuypers@uz.kuleuven.ac.be

Keywords: Campath1-H; CTLA4Ig; kidney transplantation; monoclonal antibodies

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The first monoclonal antibody (MoAb) used for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection was OKT3, a murine antibody directed against the 20 000 Da molecular subunit linked to the T-cell antigen receptor [1]. Although several studies demonstrated the efficacy of OKT3 in the prevention and treatment of acute rejection (AR), its widespread clinical use was hampered by a number of serious side effects that can be summarized in four categories. The first, administration of the drug is often accompanied by a cytokine-release syndrome with high fever, chills, arterial hypertension and even pulmonary oedema as result of capillary leak. Secondly, a substantial number of patients will develop antibodies against the xenogeneic epitope that are responsible for decreased efficacy. Thirdly, cross-reactions with non-target tissue may produce thrombocytopenia and neutropenia or aseptic meningo-encephalitis. Lastly, a higher incidence of infectious complications and malignancies has been reported, suggesting over-immunosuppression.

More recently, through molecular . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Monoclonal antibodies against the interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL2-R-MoAb's)

Efalizumab

Monoclonal antibodies directed against the co-stimulatory signals

The lymphocyte depleting anti-CD52 MoAb Campath-1H (Alemtuzumab)

Conclusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. D. Duncan and D. S. Wilkes
Transplant-related Immunosuppression: A Review of Immunosuppression and Pulmonary Infections
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2005; 2(5): 449 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. Yonekawa and J. M. Harlan
Targeting leukocyte integrins in human diseases
J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 77(2): 129 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]