Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2004 19(12):2961-2964; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh510
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/12/2961    most recent
gfh510v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Challacombe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mamode, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Challacombe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mamode, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 12 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Editorial Comment

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Ben Challacombe and Nizam Mamode

Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mr Nizam Mamode, Clinical Transplantation, New Guy's House, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. Email: Nizam.Mamode@gstt.sthames.nhs.uk

Keywords: laparoscopy; live donor nephrectomy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.



   Background
 
Traditional open living donor nephrectomy (ODN) is a safe procedure with a mortality of 0.03% [1]. However, there is significant donor morbidity with acute and chronic wound pain, wound infection, prolonged hospital stay, late return to full activity and a risk of incisional herniae. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) was introduced <10 years ago in an attempt to minimize these complications, but concerns have been raised about the security of the technique for both donor and recipient, and whether it offers sufficient benefit over modern open techniques, including mini-incision nephrectomy. LLDN remains a technically difficult and complex operation, scoring 16 out of 21 for difficulty in the European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations [2].



   Techniques
 
LLDN was first described at Johns Hopkins University by Ratner et al. in 1995 [3] on a 40-year-old man with good results. It may be performed using the hand-assisted method . . . [Full Text of this Article]



   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs open surgery
 


   Costs
 


   Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
 
Ureteric complications
Graft function
Other complications


   Right-sided donor nephrectomy
 


   Multiple arteries
 


   Hand-assisted vs ‘pure’ laparoscopic nephrectomy
 


   Training
 


   Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?