Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torffvit, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torffvit, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1711-1715
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Invited Comment

Hyperglycaemia in diabetes: impact on nephropathy and cardiac risk

Ole Torffvit

Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ole Torffvit, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, S-22185 Lund, Sweden. Email: ole.torffvit@med.lu.se

Keywords: cardiac risk; diabetes; hyperglycaemia; nephropathy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

In the past there has been much discussion whether improved control of hyperglycaemia translates into better cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Today this has been proven both for type 1 diabetes in the DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial) [1] as well as for type 2 diabetes by the Kumamoto trial [2] and UK-PDS study (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), respectively [3]. It has also become clear, however, that important though hyperglycaemic control is, it is absolutely necessary to use an integrated approach controlling the entire spectrum of risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, dyslipidaemia, etc. [4].

The urgency of intervention is illustrated by our own 10 year observational study: mortality was 14% in type 1 and 33% in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria; it was even higher, i.e. 38% for type 1 and 73% for type 2 diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Integrated treatment approach

Metabolic control and progression of renal disease

Improved glycaemic control: the role of intensified traditional insulin treatment

How to prevent hyperinsulinaemia and restore the early rise of plasma insulin?

Glycaemic control: new insulin types

Oral hypoglycaemic agents, e.g. sulfonylureas and metformin

Conclusions and recommendations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?