Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 20-22
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
Editorial Comments
Which is the preferred vascular access in diabetic patients? A view from Europe
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital, Modena, Italy
Keywords: diabetes; vascular access
Introduction
After 35 years of experience with dialysis treatment, the prompt availability of a well-functioning, stable vascular access remains a disturbing problem, compared with the successful solutions formed for renal anaemia, water purity, biocompatibility and others. This is especially true when dealing with the issue of vascular access in diabetic patients, in which the increasing prevalence of the disease and the severity of vascular damage demand special efforts of the health staff.
Which kind of diabetes?
Proper classification of diabetes in end-stage renal disease is still a problem, mainly due to misinterpretation of the use of insulin treatment. It is clear that at present, from a clinical point of view, two different diseases are frequently taken together.
With vascular access (VA), type 2 diabetes adds the effect of ageing to that of the vascular alterations linked to the basic disease [
Strategy or technique?
Different attitudes?
Conclusions
Notes
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Kunzendorf, B. K. Kramer, W. Arns, J. Braun, J. Grossmann, F. Pietruck, H. Schmidt-Gayk, A. Schwarz, E. Ziegler, H. Sperschneider, et al. Bone disease after renal transplantation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 450 - 458. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Lazarides, G. S. Georgiadis, V. D. Tzilalis, and D. Bonucchi Diabetes should not preclude efforts for creation of a primary radiocephalic fistula Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 1852 - 1854. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pengloan, R. Vanholder, and H. Hoeben Vascular access: care and monitoring Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1141 - 1145. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
