Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kooman, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Leunissen, K. M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kooman, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Leunissen, K. M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1749-1752
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Editorial Comments

Kt/V: finding the tree within the woods

Jeroen P. Kooman, Frank M. van der Sande and Karel M. L. Leunissen

Department of Internal Medicine, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Keywords: dialysis efficacy; Kt/V determination

Introduction

Dialysis efficacy is one of the predominant factors determining survival in haemodialysis patients. The index Kt/Vurea, which is a function of dialyser urea clearance, treatment time, and urea distribution volume, is by far the most commonly used marker for dialysis adequacy and was found to be related to morbidity and mortality in various studies [1,2]. Therefore, Kt/Vurea, or more commonly called Kt/V, is generally proposed as the predominant treatment parameter in influential guidelines and multi-centre studies [3,4]. Nevertheless, despite the fact that the concept of Kt/V has been introduced more than 15 years ago [1], there is still ample discussion about the best method to assess this parameter. The main problem is that the so-called single-pool methods assume that urea is present in one homogeneous distribution volume. This is actually not the case, as is evident from the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Which types of rebound can be distinguished?

How to compensate for urea rebound

Direct urea monitoring

Methods based on ionic dialysance

Conclusion

Editor's note

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?