Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1978-1982
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
Editorial Comments
Glycaemic control and graft loss following renal transplantation
Renal Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia
Keywords: diabetes; glycaemic; rejection; transplantation
Introduction
Diabetes is the single most common reason for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the Western world. Currently, one-quarter of all renal transplant patients and almost half of all patients entering renal replacement programs have diabetes [1]. In addition, many patients without diabetic nephropathy show glucose intolerance and manifest hyperglycaemia following transplantation. We have recently reported the development of significant fasting hyperglycaemia (>8.0 mmol/l) immediately following transplant surgery in 73% of patients without diabetes [2]. Moreover, a majority of patients continue to be hyperglycaemic long after surgery. Careful attention to glycaemic control is therefore important for most patients undergoing renal transplantation because, in addition to reductions in post-operative infection [3] and prevention of the vascular complications of diabetes, there is evidence that glycaemic control also contributes to the main causes of allograft loss.
Acute rejection
Patients with diabetes have an increased incidence of acute rejection following renal
Delayed graft function
Chronic allograft dysfunction
Disease recurrence
Glycaemic control before and after transplantation
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Notes
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Chisholm, C. A. Spivey, and L. L. Mulloy Effects of a medication assistance program with medication therapy management on the health of renal transplant recipients Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2007; 64(14): 1506 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Magee and M. Pascual Update in Renal Transplantation Arch Intern Med, July 12, 2004; 164(13): 1373 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

