Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Veitch, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Veitch, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1124-1126
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Editorial Comments

Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy

Michael L. Nicholson and Peter S. Veitch

Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK

Keywords: kidney transplantation; laparoscopy; live-; donor nephrectomy

Introduction

The demand for kidney transplantation continues to outstrip the supply, with the inevitable consequence that kidney transplant waiting lists lengthen each year. One of the potential solutions to this problem is to increase the use of live donors, a policy that has been particularly successful in Norway [1]. Although living kidney donation has many advantages, including the best graft survival results, these benefits carry a unique price in that an otherwise healthy individual must be exposed to all the risks of major surgery for the benefit of another person. A traditional open nephrectomy, whether performed through an extraperitoneal loin approach or a transperitoneal anterior approach, leaves a formidable wound. There is no doubt that this is one of the main disincentives to potential live donors who may express concerns about wound pain, poor cosmetic results and the need for a prolonged recovery period. The advent of laparoscopic live-donor . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Surgical technique

Comparisons of laparoscopic and conventional open nephrectomy

Prospects

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Holden, A. Smith, P. Dukes, H. Pilmore, and M. Yasutomi
Assessment of 100 Live Potential Renal Donors for Laparoscopic Nephrectomy with Multi-Detector Row Helical CT
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 973 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
N J A Webb, R Johnson, and R J Postlethwaite
Renal transplantation
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 844 - 847.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. A Andrews
Recent developments: Renal transplantation
BMJ, March 2, 2002; 324(7336): 530 - 534.
[Full Text] [PDF]