Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, W. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1749-1750
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Editorial Comments

Clash of cultures: nephrologists meet the market economy

William M. Bennett

Medical Director, Solid Organ and Cellular Transplantation, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, OR, USA

Introduction

Over the past decade, the delivery of medical care has undergone dramatic changes and the practice of nephrologists in their care of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has been transformed. In the US, approximately 70% of patients are now dialysed in facilities managed and owned by corporate entities. These companies are publicly traded on the stock exchanges and thus have investor-owners. Some of these companies are vertically integrated, such that everything that is purchased such as dialysis machines, dialysers, accessories and tubing are products of the corporation. The dialysis nurses are employees of the corporation. While physicians managing their patients in these units are usually not corporation employees some exceptions exist. It is unclear whether these trends affect the outcomes of nephrology care, but at the very least they make the relationship between the doctors and their . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Physician's responsibility for patient outcome

Differences in dialysis practice between countries

Medical decision making: potential conflicts of interest

Performance measures versus doctor–patient relationship

Patient care: an alternative to profit or institutional programmes?

Transparency of market-orientated research

Transparency of physicians' relationship with industry

From a sound cooperation with industry to optimal patient care

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?