Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 26, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp571
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hommel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kamper, A.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hommel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kamper, A.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The Danish Registry on Regular Dialysis and Transplantation:completeness and validity of incident patient registration

Kristine Hommel1,2, Søren Rasmussen2, Mette Madsen3 and Anne-Lise Kamper1

1 Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark 2 National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Kristine Hommel; E-mail: khommel{at}dadlnet.dk



  Abstract

Background. The Danish National Registry on Regular Dialysis and Transplantation (NRDT) provides systematic information on the epidemiology and treatment of end-stage chronic kidney disease in Denmark. It is therefore of major importance that the registry is valid and complete. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the registration of incident patients on chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Methods. Incident patients on chronic RRT in the period 2001–2004 were identified in NRDT and in the National Patient Registry, which contains information on hospital admissions and treatments. In the National Patient Registry, identification of patients was as follows: patients receiving the procedure of dialysis during a minimum of 90 days and for a minimum of 12 times or the procedure of renal transplantation. Only patients with at least 2 years of dialysis-free interval before and never being transplanted were included. The completeness of NRDT was calculated as the percentage of new patients on chronic RRT registered in the National Patient Registry also found in NRDT. Validity of data in NRDT was assessed by information from medical records and analysed using kappa statistics.

Results. Completeness of NRDT: Of 3020 patients registered in the National Patient Registry as incident chronic RRT patients, 97.2% were found in NRDT but 22.5% with another year of entry. There were no differences in completeness between hospitals or regions. Validity of NRDT: Validity of common renal diagnoses and RRT modality was high: diabetic nephropathy (kappa = 0.98), adult polycystic kidney disease (kappa = 0.95), chronic glomerulonephritis (kappa = 0.78) and RRT modality (kappa = 0.94). The diagnosis CKD of unknown aetiology and type of diabetes were less valid (kappa = 0.62, 0.60 and 0.73, respectively). The date of RRT start had also high validity.

Conclusions. Completeness of incident patient registration in NRDT was highly acceptable. Validity of incident patient data was also good, except for type of diabetes.

Keywords: completeness; end-stage renal disease; national registry; validation

Received for publication: 24. 4.09
Revision received 24. 9.09. Accepted in revised form: 30. 9.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.