Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 23, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp559
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sengstock, D.
Right arrow Articles by Saran, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sengstock, D.
Right arrow Articles by Saran, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Dominance of traditional cardiovascular risk factors over renal function in predicting arterial stiffness in subjects with chronic kidney disease

David Sengstock1,2,3, Robin L. Sands4, Brenda W. Gillespie4, Xiaotong Zhang4, Margaret Kiser5, George Eisele6, Peter Vaitkevicius1,2,3, Martin Kuhlmann7, Nathan W. Levin7, Alan Hinderliter5, Sanjay Rajagopalan8 and Rajiv Saran2,4

1 Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 3 Oakwood Healthcare System, Dearborn, MI, USA 4 Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 5 Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 6 Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA 7 Renal Research Institute,New York, NY, USA 8 The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rajiv Saran; E-mail: rsaran{at}umich.edu



  Abstract

Background. The predictors of arterial stiffness across the spectrum of renal function are unclear. These predictors were investigated across a wide range of estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR).

Methods. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV; an index of arterial stiffness) was measured in 264 subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3–5 from three nephrology clinics (‘lower GFR group’). PWV was also measured in 149 subjects without previously recognized CKD (‘higher GFR group’) including n = 26 with eGFR between 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and n = 123 with eGFR between 60 and 100 ml/min/1.73 m2. The association between PWV and eGFR was investigated using linear regression.

Results. The 413 subjects had a mean age of 61.9 years, were 51% male, 28% diabetic and 79% hypertensive. In age-adjusted analyses within the ‘lower GFR group’, ‘higher GFR group’ and combined group, PWV correlated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), diabetes mellitus, body mass index (BMI) and resting heart rate (all P < 0.0008). In addition, PWV correlated inversely with eGFR in the ‘higher GFR group’ (P = 0.03) and combined group (P < 0.0001). In multivariable regression analyses of the combined group (n = 413), PWV was independently predicted by eGFR (P < 0.05). However, eGFR explained at most 4% of the variability in PWV in age-adjusted analyses (compared with 13–15% explained by SBP, PP or diabetes) and <1% of PWV variability in models adjusting for age, SBP, diabetes, heart rate and BMI (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion. Although eGFR may independently predict PWV, the contribution of GFR per se does not appear to be clinically meaningful when compared with traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Keywords: arterial stiffness; arteriosclerosis; cardio-renal; kidney disease; pulse wave velocity

Received for publication: 27. 1.09
Accepted in revised form: 25. 9.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.