Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 26, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp532
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Functional polymorphisms in transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGFβ-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes modify risk of renal parenchymal scarring following childhood urinary tract infection

Almontaser Hussein1,2, Eman Askar2, Moustafa Elsaeid1 and Franz Schaefer1

1 Division of Paediatric Nephrology, Center for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Children Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Franz Schaefer; E-mail: Franz.Schaefer{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de



  Abstract

Background. The risk of renal scar formation following urinary tract infection (UTI) varies markedly between individuals. We sought to investigate a possible role of the common polymorphisms in the gene encoding for VEGF and TGFβ-1, key regulators of tissue repair, in renal scarring.

Methods. Acute pyelonephritis was diagnosed in 104 children (63 males) aged 2 months to 12 years by urine culture and 99Tc-DMSA renal scan. A follow-up isotope scan was performed 4–6 months later to identify new renal scar formation. Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was examined by micturating cystourethrogram. Controls comprised 300 healthy children with no evidence of renal disease. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TGFβ-1 (–800 A/G, –509 C/T and 869 C/T) and four SNPs in the VEGF gene (–2578 C/A, –1154 G/A, –460 T/C and +405 G/C) were genotyped in all subjects.

Results. Forty-six of the 104 patients developed renal parenchymal scarring (44.2%). VUR was found in 35.6%. The –509 T allele in the TGFβ-1 promoter was significantly more common in cases with renal scarring (51%) than in non-scarring patients (22.4%) and controls (23.6%) (both P < 0.0001). At the haplotype level, the GTC combination at –800/–509/+869 was strongly associated with renal scarring (P = 0.0002). VEGF–460 CC was more common in UTI cases with renal scarring than in non-scarring patients and controls (P = 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). Multiple logistic regression testing identified the presence of VUR (odds ratio 12.4, CI 3.8–40; P < 0.001) and the TGFβ-1 –509 T allele (OR 6.1, CI 2.4–15.5; P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for renal scarring after UTI. In contrast, age, gender and the type of underlying organism were not predictive of renal scarring.

Conclusions. Activating variants in the TGFβ-1 and VEGF gene promoters are associated with post-UTI renal scar formation in children. The TGFβ-1 509T allele predicts renal scarring independent of VUR.

Keywords: haplotypes; polymorphisms; renal; scarring; TGFB1

Received for publication: 21. 7.09
Accepted in revised form: 16. 9.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.