Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 17, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp492
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cordeiro, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Carrero, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cordeiro, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Carrero, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of ERA-EDTA]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Abdominal fat deposition is associated with increased inflammation, protein–energy wasting and worse outcome in patients undergoing haemodialysis

Antonio Carlos Cordeiro1,2, Abdul Rashid Qureshi1, Peter Stenvinkel1, Olof Heimbürger1, Jonas Axelsson1, Peter Bárány1, Bengt Lindholm1 and Juan Jesús Carrero1,3

1 Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 2 Department of Hypertension and Nephrology, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 3 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Juan Jesús Carrero; E-mail: juan.jesus.carrero{at}ki.se



  Abstract

Objective. The role of obesity in promoting or preventing the complications of haemodialysis patients remains unclear, with several studies suggesting that obesity may even be beneficial. We tested the hypothesis that abdominal fat deposition in HD patients is a risk factor associated with both increased inflammation and protein–energy wasting (PEW), as well as elevated mortality risk.

Methods. A cross-sectional study with mortality follow-up [median 41 (interquartile range 25–47) months] of haemodialysis patients [n = 173, 100 men, aged 65 (51–74) years]. Abdominal fat deposition was assessed by means of a conicity index (Ci), which estimates fat accumulation in the abdomen as the deviation of body shape from a cylindrical towards a double-cone shape (i.e. two cones with a common base at the waist level). The Ci was studied with regard to baseline inflammatory, anthropometric and nutritional markers, including subjective global assessment (SGA).

Results. Across increasing tertiles of the Ci, patients were older, fatter and more inflamed (P < 0.01 for all). At the same time, they presented a higher prevalence of PEW (SGA >1), reduced handgrip strength and lower S-creatinine (P < 0.01 for all). An increased abdominal fat deposition was associated with worse outcome independently of age, sex, comorbidities and dialysis vintage [Cox HR 1.93 (95% CI = 1.06–3.49)], but the predictive value disappeared following adjustment for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and PEW.

Conclusion. Abdominal fat deposition in haemodialysis patients is linked to both inflammation and PEW, resulting in an increased mortality risk. Our results support the idea that regional differences in adiposity accumulation may have diverse implications on patient outcome.

Keywords: conicity index; haemodialysis; inflammation; mortality; obesity

Received for publication: 3. 4.09
Accepted in revised form: 24. 8.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.