NDT Advance Access published online on September 17, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp490
Body composition in home haemodialysis versus conventional haemodialysis: a cross-sectional, matched, comparative study
1 Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre 2 Department of Medicine, Monash University 3 Body Composition Laboratory, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rebecca Pellicano; E-mail: rebecca.pellicano{at}med.monash.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
Background. Nutritional status predicts outcome in dialysis populations. Increased dialysis time and/or frequency reportedly improves nutritional status. We examined the impact of more intensive dialysis on body composition.
Methods. A cross-sectional, matched study comparing home haemodialysis (HHD) patients (>15 h/week, n = 28) and conventional haemodialysis (CHD) patients (<15 h/ week, n = 28), matched for age, sex, length of time on dialysis and diabetes, was performed. We measured total body protein (TBP) by in vivo neutron activation, total body fat (TBF) and skeletal muscle mass (SKMM) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and biochemical and inflammatory parameters. Visceral (VFA) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFA) were determined from computed tomography.
Results. There was no significant difference in TBP (10.2 ± 1.9 kg CHD versus 10.8 ± 1.8 kg HHD, P = 0.18) or SKMM (25.6 ± 5.6 kg CHD versus 26.2 ± 4.2 kg HHD). TBF was not different (27.7 ± 10.7 kg CHD versus 27.8 ± 16.0 kg HHD), although the HHD group had greater VFA (182.0 ± 105.6 cm2 versus 173.8 ± 90.1 cm2) and lower SFA (306.7 ± 176.4 cm2 versus 309.7 ± 138.1 cm2), the difference was not statistically significant. Albumin concentrations were significantly increased in the HHD group (37.5 ± 3.56 g/L versus 35.18 ± 4.11 g/L, P = 0.03), whilst phosphate concentrations (1.57 ± 0.41 mmol/LHHD versus 1.92 ± 0.62 mmol/ LCHD, P = 0.02) and inflammatory parameters were lower. There was a positive relationship between hours of dialysis and TBP (β = 0.08; P = 0.03).
Conclusion. Surrogate nutritional markers and inflammatory parameters improved with more intensive dialysis, but this was not reflected by improved body composition. Further prospective studies are required to confirm whether more intensive dialysis affects body composition, and whether this impacts on metabolic risk and clinical outcome.
Keywords: body composition; home haemodialysis; inflammation; nocturnal haemodialysis; nutrition
Received for publication: 6. 3.09
Accepted in revised form: 21. 8.09