Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 7, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp452
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirozzi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pugliese, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pirozzi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pugliese, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of ERA-EDTA]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Microsurgery and preventive haemostasis for autogenous radial–cephalic direct wrist access in adult patients with radial artery internal diameter below 1.6 mm

Nicola Pirozzi1, Francesca Apponi1, Antonello M. Napoletano2, Remo Luciani3, Vincenzo Pirozzi4 and Francesco Pugliese1

1 Department of Clinical Science, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis University La Sapienza 2 Istituto Superiore di Sanità 3 AO Sant'Andrea, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis University La Sapienza 4 Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Casa di Cura Nuova Itor, Rome, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Nicola Pirozzi; E-mail: n.pirozzi{at}tiscali.it



  Abstract

Background. Autogenous radial–cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula (RCF), the gold standard for chronic dialysis, suffers from an elevated early failure rate (up to 20–50% with a pooled rate of 15.3%). Guidelines indicate that a small radial artery internal diameter (<1.6–2 mm) is strongly predictive of this early failure. Microsurgery and preventive haemostasis have been reported to give excellent results in a paediatric population (children <10 kg bw) and have shown a much lower early failure rate of 5–10%. Given these excellent results, we have used microsurgery along with preventive haemostasis in adult patients. We herein describe the results of RCF created in patients with a radial artery internal diameter <1.6 mm.

Methods. From November 2004 to December 2007, 28 RCFs were created in 28 patients with a distal radial artery internal diameter <1.6 mm using microsurgery and preventive haemostasis. The median age was 68 and the male/female ratio was 6/22. The incidence of age >65 years was 64%, hypertension 96%, diabetes 32.1%, obesity (BMI>30) 35%, vascular disease 46%. The mean distal radial artery and cephalic vein internal diameters, measured with ultrasound examination, were 1.3 mm and 1.9 mm, respectively. Seventy-five percent of the patients were not yet on dialysis treatment; 19% of whom had a previous failed vascular access created elsewhere without microsurgery. The remaining 25% patients were on dialysis treatment with a temporary femoral catheter.

Results. All interventions ended with a patent anastomosis; no thrombosis occurred within the initial 24 h. The early failure rate was 14% (4 out of 28 patients). The causes of early failure were thrombosis >1 week after surgery in one patient, lack of maturation (patent but unfunctional fistula) due to juxta-anastomotic vein stenosis in two patients and mid-vein stenosis in one patient. Treatment for all patients was proximalization of the anastomosis at the distal/mid forearm. Primary patency and secondary patency at 1 year were 68 ± 10% and 96 ± 5%, respectively.

Conclusions. From our findings, we have shown that it is possible to create RCF in adult patients with a radial artery internal diameter of <1.6 mm with an acceptable risk of early failure rate using microsurgery along with preventive haemostasis.

Keywords: arterial diameter; arteriovenous fistula; microsurgery; preventive haemostasis

Received for publication: 24. 8.08
Accepted in revised form: 11. 8.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.