Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 10, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp446
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daugirdas, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tattersall, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daugirdas, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tattersall, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of ERA-EDTA]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Effect of treatment spacing and frequency on three measures of equivalent clearance, including standard Kt/V

John T. Daugirdas1 and James Tattersall2

1 University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 2 St. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: John T. Daugirdas; E-mail: jtdaugir{at}uic.edu



  Abstract

Background. We examined the sensitivity of three different equivalent clearances to the spacing of haemodialysis treatments as well as to frequency. One would expect that a well-spaced schedule would be beneficial, and an optimal clearance measure should reflect this.

Methods. Using a variable volume two-pool urea kinetic model, we derived clearances based on G [urea nitrogen (UN) generation rate] divided by time-averaged UN (G/TAC), mean predialysis UN (G/meanpre or ‘standard’ Kt/V) or peak UN (G/peak) when identical dialysis treatments were given on a poorly spaced (Monday—Tuesday—Wednesday) versus a well-spaced (Monday—Wednesday—Friday) schedule. We also calculated the ‘gain’ in each clearance when well-spaced treatments were given six versus three times a week. Modelling parameters were diffusive dialyser clearance = 283 ml/min, session length = 210 min (105 min for 6/week), G = 7 mg/min, V = 35 l and weight gain = 10 l/week.

Results. The ‘standard’ Kt/V (G/meanpre) was the same with the poorly spaced (Monday—Tuesday—Wednesday) and well-spaced (Monday—Wednesday—Friday) schedules. In contrast, the G/TAC- and G/peak-based clearances were higher with the well-spaced schedule (+20% and +37%, respectively).

When total treatment time was held constant at 630 min/week, the gain of moving from three to six treatments per week was lower with G/TAC (+9%) than with G/meanpre (+29%) or with G/peak (+18%). When 6/week treatment time was doubled to 1260 min/week, the gains with G/TAC and G/pre (relative to 3/week with 630 min/week dialysis) were similar (about +94% to 97%), but were lower with G/peak (+55%).

Conclusions. All three equivalent clearances increased on moving from three to six sessions per week, with standard Kt/V having the greatest increase. Standard Kt/V is not at all sensitive to spacing. Alternative clearances based on the TAC or peak concentration have the advantage of taking both spacing and frequency into account.

Keywords: adequacy; daily haemodialysis; haemodialysis; urea kinetic

Received for publication: 9. 5.09
Accepted in revised form: 10. 8.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.