Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 15, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp437
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krieter, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Canaud, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krieter, D. H
Right arrow Articles by Canaud, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of ERA-EDTA]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Protein-bound uraemic toxin removal in haemodialysis and post-dilution haemodiafiltration

Detlef H Krieter1, Andrea Hackl1, Annie Rodriguez2, Leïla Chenine2, Hélène Leray Moragues2, Horst-Dieter Lemke3, Christoph Wanner1 and Bernard Canaud2

1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany 2 Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Lapeyronie, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France 3 EXcorLab GmbH, Obernburg, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Detlef H Krieter; E-mail: krieter_d{at}medizin.uni-wuerzburg.de



  Abstract

Background. The accumulation of larger and protein-bound toxins is involved in the uraemic syndrome but their elimination by dialysis therapy remains difficult. In the present study, the impact of the albumin permeability of recently introduced advanced high-flux dialysis membranes on the removal of such substances was tested in haemodialysis and online post-dilution haemodiafiltration.

Methods. Two types of polyethersulfone membranes only differing in albumin permeability (referred as PU– and PU+) were compared in eight patients on maintenance dialysis in a prospective cross-over manner. Treatment settings were identical for individual patients: time 229 ± 22 min; blood flow rate 378 ± 33 mL/min; dialysate flow rate 500 mL/min; substitution flow rate in haemodiafiltration 94 ± 9 mL/min. Removal of the protein-bound compounds p-cresyl sulfate (pCS) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) was determined by reduction ratios (RRs), dialytic clearances and mass in continuously collected dialysate. In addition, the elimination of the low-molecular weight (LMW) proteins beta2-microglobulin, cystatin c, myoglobin (myo), free retinol-binding protein (rbp) and albumin was measured.

Results. Plasma levels of the protein-bound toxins were significantly decreased by all treatment forms. However, the decreases were comparable between dialysis membranes and between haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration. The RRs of total pCS ranged between 40.4 ± 25.3 and 47.8 ± 10.3% and of total IS between 50.4 ± 2.6 and 54.6 ± 8.7%. Elimination of free protein-bound toxins as assessed by their mass in dialysate closely correlated positively with the pre-treatment plasma concentrations being r = 0.920 (P < 0.001) for total pCS and r = 0.906 (P < 0.001) for total IS, respectively. Compared to haemodialysis, much higher removal of all LMW proteins was found in haemodiafiltration. Dialysis membrane differences were only obvious in haemodialysis for the larger LMW proteins myo and rbp yielding significantly higher RRs for PU+ (myo 46 ± 9 versus 37 ± 9%; rbp 18 ± 5 versus 15 ± 5%; P < 0.05). Additionally, the albumin loss varied between membranes and treatment modes being undetectable with PU– in haemodialysis and highest with PU+ in haemodiafiltration (1430 ± 566 mg).

Conclusions. The elimination of protein-bound compounds into dialysate is predicted by the level of pre-treatment plasma concentrations and depends particularly on diffusion. Lacking enhanced removal in online post-dilution haemodiafiltration emphasizes the minor significance of convection for the clearance of these solutes. Compared to LMW proteins, the highly protein-bound toxins pCS and IS are less effectively eliminated with all treatment forms. For a sustained decrease of pCS and IS plasma levels, alternative strategies promise to be more efficient therapy forms.

Keywords: dialysis membrane; end-stage renal disease; haemodiafiltration; haemodialysis; protein-bound toxins

Received for publication: 28. 5.09
Accepted in revised form: 4. 8.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.