Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on August 23, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp424
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Behara, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Behara, V. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Pathogenetic features of severe segmental lupus nephritis

Venkata Y. Behara1, William L. Whittier1, Stephen M. Korbet1, Melvin M. Schwartz2, Mildred Martens2,3 and Edmund J. Lewis1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology 2 Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: William L. Whittier; E-mail: william_whittier{at}rush.edu



  Abstract

Background. Accumulating evidence supports the notion that the pathogenesis of severe lupus glomerulonephritis is multifactorial and not solely an immune complex-mediated glomerular disease. Alternate mechanisms for glomerular destruction may exist.

Methods. We conducted a retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of 213 patients with lupus nephritis. Twenty-six patients had severe segmental glomerulonephritis (SSGN) and 15 patients had diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN). Patients with pure mesangial lupus nephritis [mesangial glomerulonephritis (MesGN)] (N = 13) were used as histologic controls. The degree of immunologic activity detailed by histologic data including light, fluorescent (IF) and electron microscopy (EM) on kidney biopsies and clinical data from patients with severe lupus nephritis were analysed.

Results. Biopsies from patients with SSGN had fewer glomeruli with wire loops (3 ± 6% versus 35 ± 34% P = 0.005) and hyaline thrombi (0.8 ± 3% versus 16 ± 22%, P = 0.02) compared to DPGN. The amount of IgG by IF was less in SSGN lesions compared to DPGN lesions, and IgG was absent in 30% of the SSGN group compared to none of the DPGN group (P = 0.04). There was no difference in mesangial deposits among the three groups (SSGN, DPGN and MesGN). The EM data supported the IF data. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were essentially negative in all three groups and the C3 values tended to be lower in DPGN compared to SSGN (48 ± 15 mg/dl versus 60 ± 26 mg/dl, P = 0.09).

Conclusions. The findings in DPGN involve a classic immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis as demonstrated by the abundant immune aggregates witnessed in the peripheral capillary wall. In contrast, a paucity of peripheral immune aggregates is seen in SSGN implying a different pathogenesis. Our data support a mechanism of glomerular injury in SSGN that is separate from the generally accepted unitary concept of immune complex deposition in lupus nephritis.

Keywords: glomerulonephritis; lupus nephritis; pauci-immune; pathogenesis


3 Present address: Department of Pathology, University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Received for publication: 8. 7.09
Accepted in revised form: 27. 7.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.