Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on August 23, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp389
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoste, E. A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kellum, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoste, E. A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kellum, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eric A. J. Hoste1,2, Jan J. De Waele1, Sofie A. Gevaert3, Shigehiko Uchino4 and John A. Kellum2

1 Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium 2 Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modelling of Acute illness (CRISMA) Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, USA 3 Department of Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium 4 Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Eric A. J. Hoste; E-mail: Eric.Hoste{at}UGent.be



  Abstract

Background. There have been conflicting reports on the use of intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of sodium bicarbonate for prevention of CI-AKI.

Methods. This is a symptomatic review and meta-analysis of prospectively randomized studies, abstracts and manuscripts, published from 1950 to 20 February 2009.

Results. Of 192 identified publications, 18 studies (n = 3055) were included. Nine studies were only published as an abstract. CI-AKI occurred in 11.6%. Six prospective studies demonstrated that intervention with sodium bicarbonate resulted in a decreased risk of CI-AKI. The aggregate result of the prospective trials also demonstrated a benefit favouring sodium bicarbonate (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.45–0.95). This effect was most prominent in coronary procedures and in patients with chronic kidney disease. There was no effect on need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality. Published manuscripts demonstrated a beneficial effect, while abstracts could not. Also, funnel plot analysis suggested a publication bias. In addition, we found significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies. Finally, the quality of the individual studies was limited.

Conclusions. The incidence of CI-AKI was higher than recently reported, and varied among study cohorts. We found a preventive effect of the use of sodium bicarbonate on the risk for CI-AKI, however, with borderline statistical significance. There was no effect on need for RRT or mortality. The relative low quality of the individual studies, heterogeneity and possible publication bias means that only a limited recommendation can be made in favour of the use of sodium bicarbonate.

Keywords: acute coronary syndromes; acute kidney injury; contrast-induced nephropathy; meta-analysis; systematic review

Received for publication: 30. 4.09
Accepted in revised form: 9. 7.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.