Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on July 10, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp327
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rabindranath, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Besarab, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rabindranath, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Besarab, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Systematic review of antimicrobials for the prevention of haemodialysis catheter-related infections

Kannaiyan S. Rabindranath1, Tarun Bansal2, James Adams3, Ruma Das4, Ranjit Shail5, Alison M. MacLeod6, Carol Moore7 and Anatole Besarab7

1 Renal Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford 2 Renal Unit, North Middlesex Hospital 3 Renal Unit, Kings College Hospital, London 4 Renal Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading 5 Renal Unit, Royal London Hospital, London 6 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK 7 Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kannaiyan S. Rabindranath; E-mail: ksrabi{at}yahoo.co.uk



  Abstract

Background. Almost 30% of chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients are dependent on central venous catheters (CVCs) for their vascular access, and catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) is the major reason for catheter loss and has been associated with substantial morbidity, including meta-static infections. This systematic review evaluates the benefits and harms of antimicrobial interventions for the prevention of catheter-related infections (CRIs).

Methods. MEDLINE (1950–May 2009), EMBASE (1980–May 2009) CENTRAL (up to May 2009) and bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched for relevant RCTs. Analysis was by a random effects model and results expressed as rate ratio, relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results. A total of 29 trials with 2886 patients and 3005 catheters were included. Antimicrobial catheter locks (AMLs) significantly reduced the rates of CRBs (rate ratio, 0.33, 95% CI 0.24–0.45) and exit-site infections (ESIs) (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.96). Exit-site antimicrobial application also significantly reduced the rates of CRBs (rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.12–0.36) and ESIs (rate ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.47). Antimicrobial coating of HD catheters and the use of peri-operative antimicrobials did not result in significant reduction in rates of CRBs and ESIs.

Conclusion. The use of AMLs and exit-site antimicrobials are useful measures in the reduction of CRIs, whereas antimicrobial impregnated catheters and peri-operative systemic antimicrobial administration have not been found to be beneficial. Further head-to-head trials of various AMLs and exit-site antimicrobials are needed to know about their comparative clinical efficacy.

Keywords: antimicrobial locks; antimicrobials; bacteraemia; catheter; haemodialysis

Received for publication: 8. 3.08
Accepted in revised form: 12. 6.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.