Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on May 14, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp212
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/9/2809    most recent
gfp212v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Prescription of antihypertensive agents to haemodialysis patients: time trends and associations with patient characteristics, country and survival in the DOPPS

Antonio Alberto Lopes1, Jennifer L. Bragg-Gresham2, Sylvia P. B. Ramirez2, Vittorio E. Andreucci3, Takashi Akiba4, Akira Saito5, Stefan H. Jacobson6, Bruce M. Robinson2, Friedrich K. Port2, Nancy A. Mason7 and Eric W. Young8

1 Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 2 Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 3 Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy 4 Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan 5 Tokai University, Institute of Medical Science, Kanagawa, Japan 6 Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 7 University of Michigan, College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 8 Veterans Affairs Medical Center/University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Friedrich K. Port; E-mail: friedrich.port{at}arborresearch.org



  Abstract

Background. Haemodialysis patients were studied in 12 countries to identify practice patterns of prescription of antihypertensive agents (AHA) associated with survival.

Methods. The sample included 28 513 patients enrolled in DOPPS I and II. The classes of AHA studied were beta blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), peripheral blocker, central antagonist, vasodilator, long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), short-acting dihydropyridine CCB and non-dihydropyridine CCB. To reduce bias due to unmeasured confounders, the associations with mortality were assessed by separate Cox models based on patient-level prescription and facility prescription practice.

Results. An increase in prescription of ARBs (9.5%) and BBs (9.1%) was observed from DOPPS I to II. Prescription of AHA classes varied significantly by country, ranging for BBs from 9.7% in Japan to 52.7% in Sweden and for ARBs from 5.5% in Italy to 21.3% in Japan in DOPPS II. Facilities that treated 10% more patients with ARBs had, on average, 7% lower all-cause mortality, independent of patient characteristics and the prescription patterns of other antihypertensive medications (P = 0.05). Significant and independent associations with reduction in cardiovascular mortality were observed for ARBs (RR = 0.79; P = 0.005) and BBs (RR = 0.87, P = 0.004) in analyses of patient-level prescriptions. These associations in the facility-level model followed the same direction.

Conclusions. DOPPS data show large variations across countries in AHA prescription for haemodialysis patients. The data suggest an association between ARB use and reduction in all-cause mortality, as well as with the use of BBs and reduction in cardiovascular mortality among haemodialysis patients.

Keywords: antihypertensive agents; cardiovascular; haemodialysis; mortality

Received for publication: 26. 6.08
Accepted in revised form: 16. 4.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.