Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on February 25, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/8/2433    most recent
gfp073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys

Bryan Waldo1, Stephen M. Korbet1, Maija G. Freimanis2 and Edmund J. Lewis1

1 Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine 2 Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Stephen M. Korbet, 1426 W. Washington Blvd, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. Tel: +1-312-850-8434; Fax: +1-312-850-8431; E-mail: skorbet{at}aol.com



  Abstract

Background. Clinically significant bleeding complications occur in >30% of patients undergoing percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) of native kidneys and can be severe in up to 10% of patients. A noninvasive measure that would reliably predict which patients will do well with an uncomplicated post-biopsy course or which patients may be at risk of developing a clinically significant complication is in great demand.

Methods. PRB of native kidneys was performed in 162 adult patients from February 2002 through February 2007 using real-time ultrasound and automated needle. Renal ultrasound (US) was performed at 1-h post-PRB to assess biopsy-related bleeding. Patients were observed for 24 h post-PRB to monitor clinically apparent biopsy-related complications. The value of the post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications was assessed.

Results. A clinically apparent complication was observed in 26 (16%) patients post-PRB (13 minor not requiring any intervention and 13 major requiring intervention). In patients with complicated courses, a haematoma at 1 h was seen in 77% (69% with minor and 87% with major complications). However, only 27 (20%) of 136 patients without complications (P < 0.0001) had a haematoma at 1 h. The presence of a haematoma 1-h post-PRB had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 43% but a negative predictive value of 95% for predicting clinical complications.

Conclusions. We find that with the use of renal ultrasound 1-h post-PRB, the absence of perinephric bleeding is predictive of an uncomplicated course while the presence of a perinephric haematoma is not reliably predictive of a clinically significant complication post-renal biopsy.

Keywords: complications; perinephric haematoma; renal biopsy; ultrasound

Received for publication: 20.11.08
Accepted in revised form: 2. 2.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Mackinnon, J. McKinlay, E. McQuarrie, and C. Geddes
Early ultrasound to detect complications after renal biopsy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 23, 2009; (2009) gfp540v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. M. Korbet, B. Waldo, M. G. Freimanis, and E. J. Lewis
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 23, 2009; (2009) gfp573v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.