Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 17, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn521
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/571    most recent
gfn521v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okuno, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nishizawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okuno, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nishizawa, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Serum β2-microglobulin level is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance haemodialysis patients

Senji Okuno1, Eiji Ishimura2, Kaori Kohno1, Yoko Fujino-Katoh1, Yoshifumi Maeno1, Tomoyuki Yamakawa1, Masaaki Inaba2 and Yoshiki Nishizawa2

1 Kidney Center, Shirasagi Hospital 2 Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Eiji Ishimura, Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. Tel: +81-6-6645-3806; Fax: +81-6-6645-3808; E-mail: ish{at}med.osaka-cu.ac.jp



  Abstract

Background. β2-Microglobulin (β2-M) is recognized as a surrogate marker of middle-molecule uraemic toxins and is a key component in the genesis of dialysis-associated amyloidosis. Few studies have evaluated the association of β2-M levels with clinical outcome in dialyzed patients.

Methods. The prognostic implication of serum β2-M levels for the survival of haemodialysis patients was examined in 490 prevalent haemodialysis patients (60.1 ± 11.8 years, haemodialysis duration of 87.4 ± 75.7 months, 288 males and 202 females; 24% diabetics). The patients were divided into two groups according to their serum β2-M levels: lower β2-M group (n = 245) with serum β2-M <32.2 mg/L (the median serum β2-M) and higher β2-M group (n = 245) with that ≥32.2 mg/L.

Results. During the follow-up period of 40 ± 15 months, there were 91 all-cause deaths, and out of them, 36 were from cardiovascular diseases. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that all-cause mortality in the higher β2-M group was significantly higher compared to that in the lower β2-M group (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed that serum β2-M level was a significant predictor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.08; P = 0.005), and for non-cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.10; P = 0.006), after adjustment for age, gender, haemodialysis duration, the presence of diabetes, serum albumin and serum C-reactive protein.

Conclusion. These results demonstrate that the serum β2-M level is a significant predictor of mortality in haemodialysis patients, independent of haemodialysis duration, diabetes, malnutrition and chronic inflammation, suggesting the clinical importance of lowering serum β2-M in these patients.

Keywords: haemodialysis; mortality; non-cardiovascular mortality; β2-microglobulin

Received for publication: 31. 3.08
Accepted in revised form: 25. 8.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. L. Penne, T. van Berkel, N. C. van der Weerd, M. P. C. Grooteman, and P. J. Blankestijn
Optimizing haemodiafiltration: tools, strategy and remaining questions
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3579 - 3581.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.