Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on May 25, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn282
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackinnon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackinnon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy?

Bruce Mackinnon1, Emily Fraser2, Keith Simpson1, Jonathan G. Fox1 and Colin Geddes2

1 Renal Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary 2 Renal Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Bruce Mackinnon, Renal Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Third Floor, Walton Building, 84-86 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 OSF, United Kingdom. Tel: +44-141-211-4007; Fax: +44-141-211-4843; E-mail: bmackinnon{at}hotmail.com



  Abstract

Background. The practice of advising patients to stop antiplatelet agents before an elective renal biopsy is widespread. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bleeding complications in two centres that have different policies regarding the ongoing use of antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing an elective renal biopsy. Neither centre routinely checks bleeding time before renal biopsy. A secondary aim, therefore, was to compare complication rates from this cohort with those reported in the literature where screening for prolonged bleeding time is standard practice.

Methods. A retrospective study of 1120 biopsies performed by nephrologists under direct ultrasound guidance in the two renal units in Glasgow, Scotland (Jan 2000 to May 2007) was undertaken. Antiplatelet agents were stopped 5 days before biopsy in one centre but continued in the other. Bleeding time was not measured before biopsy and pro-coagulants were not routinely administered. Major bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion, surgical or radiological intervention. Minor bleeding was defined as an ≥1.0 g/dL fall in haemoglobin following biopsy without the need for transfusion or intervention.

Results. Haemoglobin fell by ≥1.0 g/dL in 221 (19.7%) patients. There were 21 (1.9%) major bleeding complications. No patient died or required nephrectomy. Gender, advancing age or worse renal impairment was not associated with an increased likelihood of bleeding. Bleeding complications in 75 patients continuing antiplatelet agents were compared with those occurring in 60 patients whose antiplatelet agents were discontinued. Minor complications were commoner in the first group (31.0 versus 11.7%; P = 0.008), though there was no difference in the rate of major complications.

Conclusions. The risk of major bleeding following a native renal biopsy under ultrasound guidance is low. Stopping antiplatelet agents before biopsy was associated with a lower rate of minor complications but there was no difference in the rate of major complications. Complication rates compare favourably with other published series in which bleeding time was checked and corrected.

Keywords: bleeding; bleeding time; complications; renal biopsy

Received for publication: 26. 2.08
Accepted in revised form: 23. 4.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.