Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on May 9, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn255
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noh, J. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noh, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



A comparison between once-weekly and twice- or thrice-weekly subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa: results from a randomized controlled multicentre study

Young Ki Lee, Sung Gyun Kim, Jang Won Seo, Ji Eun Oh, Jong-Woo Yoon, Ja-Ryong Koo, Hyung Jik Kim and Jung Woo Noh

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym Kidney Research Institute, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jung Woo Noh, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, 948-1, Daerim 1-dong, Youngdeungpo-Ku, Seoul, Korea. E-mail: jwn8671{at}unitel.co.kr



  Abstract

Background. In patients with chronic renal failure, the ability to reduce the administration frequency of subcutaneous (SC) erythropoietin (epoetin) could provide benefits and may improve compliance. The study investigated whether once-weekly SC epoetin alfa was equivalent to twice- or thrice-weekly SC administration in maintaining anaemia correction in haemodialysis patients.

Methods. Eighty-three patients were randomly assigned to either once-weekly epoetin alfa (n = 44) or their original dose twice- or thrice-weekly regimen (control, n = 39) for 12 weeks. The haemoglobin concentration was maintained within the target range of 9.0–12.0 g/dL by adjusting the dose of epoetin alfa. All patients received intravenous iron supplementation, as required.

Results. Stable haemoglobin levels were maintained without epoetin dose increases in the majority of patients in both groups (once-weekly group, 95.0%, control group, 91.4%). The mean haemoglobin levels at randomization at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were 10.7, 11.1, 11.3 and 11.0 g/dL, respectively, in the once-weekly group, and 10.5, 11.3, 11.5 and 11.3 g/dL, respectively, in the control group. The mean weekly dose of epoetin alfa at randomization at weeks 4, 8 and 12 was 142.8, 114.5, 108.6 and 104.5 IU/kg, respectively, in the once-weekly group, and 128.4, 116.0, 101.0 and 96.1 IU/kg/week, respectively, in the control group. No statistically significant between-group differences were apparent for changes in haemoglobin levels or epoetin alfa dosages at week 12.

Conclusions. This study demonstrates that once-weekly SC administration of epoetin alfa is as effective and safe as two or three times weekly administration in maintaining haemoglobin levels. Therefore, the once-weekly therapy using high dose of epoetin alfa is considered to be an efficient method in stable haemodialysis patients.

Keywords: anaemia; erythropoietin; haemodialysis

Received for publication: 21.11.07
Accepted in revised form: 14. 4.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.