Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Right arrow Articles by de Alvaro, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Right arrow Articles by de Alvaro, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1993) 8: 1244-1253
© 1993 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Am analysis off adequacy off dialysis in a selected population on CAPD for over 3 years: the influence off urea and creatinine kiwetics

R. Selgas, M. A. Bajo, M. J. Fernandez-Reyes, E. Bosque, K. Lopez-Revuelta, C. Jimenez, F. Borrego and F. de Alvaro

Nephrology Department, CAPD Unit, Hospital La Paz Madrid, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr R. Selgas. Servlclo de Nefrologla. Hospltal La Paz. Castellana 261. E-280.16 hladnd, Spain

Adequacy of dialysis is addressed to minimize the negative consequences of underdialysis. The results of the NCSD demonstrated that urea kinetic modelling ( UKM) is a useful tool in the measurement of adequacy of dialysis: Kt/V values of 1 are considered adequate to prevent complications when daily protein intake is appropriate. For CAPD no similar prospective studies exist, and consequently there is no information comparable to that for haemodialysis. Preliminary data have communicated controversial results about the usefulness of UKM for CAPD prescription. On the other hand creatinine kinetics has been proposed as an alternative to UKM to define adequacy of dialysis on CAPD. However. these results should be considered preliminary because of the small size of the series and the short observation period. The objective of this paper is to study the role of these two kinetic models in defining adequacy of dialysis in a long-term, selected CAPD population.

We have studied 56 patients treated for at least 3 years on CAPD (3–11 years: mean observation period 5 years; 3996 patient-months). Urea kinetic model (UKM) (urea weekly ( W ) Kt/V and NPCR) and creatinine kinetics (Efficacy number (EN) and K) were determined annually.

According to the present data we can conclude that Kt/V is an appropriate tool for defining adequacy in patients on CAPD. Values of weekly Kt/V greater than 1.7–1.8, with NPCR more than 1 g/kg/day, assure an adequate clinical outcome. Conversely, values on the Kt/V scale less than 1.7 entail a greater rate of complications. Our data also confirm that maintaining a serum albumin > 536–551 µmol/l (3.7–3.8 g/dl) is related to lower morbidity and mortality, and should be a major objective for CAPD patients. Consequently a relationship between dose of dialysis in terms of urea mass balance and proteln nutrition can be established. After 5 years on CAPD. when all residual renal function is generally lost, Kt/V values in excess of 1.9 are difficult to achieve. Based on currently available information, we do agree with the interest of performing a prospective study on adequacy of dialysis based on the urea kinetic model in CAPD, which definitely defines its role. On the other hand, creatinine kinetics did not show sufficient discriminative capaclty in terms of adequacy of dialysis. EN and Kt of creatinine values in the lower range (4.5–6 and less than 45–50 I/week respectively) were not necessarily associated with a poorer clinical outcome. Patients with peritoneal high diffusive capacity for small molecules showed a tendency toward proteln malnutrition and poorer clinical outcome compared to those with low diffusion capacity. Consequently, low diffusive peritoneum capacity should no longer be considered a contraindication for CAPD.

Keywords: adequacy of dialysis; CAPD; creatinine kinetics; urea kinetic model; urea Kt/V


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M.-J. F. Reyes, M.-A. Bajo, C. Hevia, G. del Peso, S. Ros, A. G. de Miguel, A. Cirugeda, M.-J. Castro, J. A. Sanchez-Tomero, and R. Selgas
Inherent high peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration deficiency: their mid-term clinical relevance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 218 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. T. Krediet
The rise and fall of the Kt/V concept in CAPD
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 970 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Virga, G. Amici, S. Mastrosimone, G. Biasio, L. Stanic, G. D. Rin, and A. Bonadonna
Day-to-day variability of adequacy indexes in peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 2932 - 2936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.