Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on February 18, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(7):2225-2232; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/7/2225    most recent
gfp059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eloot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eloot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Impact of increasing haemodialysis frequency versus haemodialysis duration on removal of urea and guanidino compounds: a kinetic analysis

Sunny Eloot1, Wim van Biesen1, Annemieke Dhondt1, Rita de Smet1, Bart Marescau2, Peter Paul De Deyn2, Pascal Verdonck3 and Raymond Vanholder1

1 Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital 2 Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, University of Antwerp 3 Institute Biomedical Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Sunny Eloot; E-mail: sunny.eloot{at}ugent.be



  Abstract

Background. Patients with renal failure retain a large variety of uraemic solutes, characterized by different kinetic behaviour. It is not entirely clear what the impact is of increasing dialysis frequency and/or duration on removal efficiency, nor whether this impact is the same for all types of solutes.

Methods. This study was based on two-compartmental kinetic data obtained in stable haemodialysis patients (n = 7) for urea, creatinine (CREA), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA) and methylguanidine (MG). For each individual patient, mathematical simulations were performed for different dialysis schedules, varying in frequency, duration and intensity. For each dialysis schedule, plasmatic and extraplasmatic weekly time-averaged concentrations (TAC) were calculated, as well as their %difference to weekly TAC of the reference dialysis schedule (three times weekly 4 h).

Results. Increasing dialysis duration was most beneficial for CREA and MG, which are distributed in a larger volume (54.0 ± 5.9 L and 102.6 ± 33.9 L) than urea (42.7 ± 6.0 L) [plasmatic weekly TAC decrease of 31.5 ± 3.2% and 31.8 ± 3.8% for CREA and MG with QB of 200 mL/min, compared to 25.7 ± 3.2% for urea (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001)]. Increasing dialysis frequency resulted only in a limited increase in efficiency, most pronounced for solutes distributed in a small volume like GSA (30.6 ± 4.2 L). Increasing both duration and frequency results in weekly TAC decreases of >65% for all solutes. Comparable results were found in the extraplasmatic compartment.

Conclusion. Prolonged dialysis significantly reduces solute concentration levels, especially for those solutes that are distributed in a larger volume. Increasing both dialysis frequency and duration is the superior dialysis schedule.

Keywords: compartmental behaviour; frequency; haemodialysis; kinetics; prolonging

Received for publication: 27.11.08
Accepted in revised form: 26. 1.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. T. Daugirdas and J. Tattersall
Effect of treatment spacing and frequency on three measures of equivalent clearance, including standard Kt/V
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 10, 2009; (2009) gfp446v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.