Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on January 7, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(4):1298-1305; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn733
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/1298    most recent
gfn733v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pradel, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pradel, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, S. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Haemodialysis patients’ readiness to pursue live donor kidney transplantation

Françoise G. Pradel1, Puckwipa Suwannaprom1, C. Daniel Mullins1, John Sadler2 and Stephen T. Bartlett3

1 Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland 2 Independent Dialysis Foundation 3 Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Françoise G. Pradel, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 220 Arch Street, Office level one, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Tel: +1-410-706-4044; Fax: +1-410-706-5394; E-mail: fpradel{at}rx.umaryland.edu



  Abstract

Background. Despite the benefits of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) over deceased donor kidney transplantation, patients hesitate to pursue this option.

Methods. A total of 324 transplant-eligible haemodialysis patients attending 14 dialysis facilities in Maryland, Northern Virginia and Southern Pennsylvania were asked about their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT, attitudes towards LKDT and demographics. Logistic regressions were used to test the effect of patients’ attitudes and demographics on their stages of readiness to pursue LDKT.

Results. Fewer than half of the patients who had heard about LDKT were considering this option. Among patients considering LDKT, 26% had not talked to their loved ones about LDKT and 54% had not asked anyone for a kidney. Concerns about the surgical procedure for the donor were associated with a lower likelihood of considering LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18–0.79), talking about LDKT (adjusted OR = 0.38; CI 0.18–0.78) and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 0.14; CI 0.06–0.36). Being satisfied with the information the patient received about LDKT was associated with a higher likelihood of talking with someone about LDKT and asking for a kidney (adjusted OR = 2.26; CI 1.33–3.83 and 3.89; CI 1.78–8.51). Women and younger patients were more likely to talk with family/friends about LDKT (respectively, adjusted OR = 1.76; CI 1.26–2.47 and 0.97; CI 0.95–0.99) and to ask for a kidney (respectively, adjusted OR = 4.36; CI 2.57–7.40 and 0.97; CI 0.94–0.99).

Conclusion. Tailored educational programmes considering the patient's stage of readiness and related attitudinal and demographic factors might help patients move towards LDKT.

Keywords: attitude; decision making; kidney transplantation; living donor; recipient

Received for publication: 28. 5.08
Accepted in revised form: 8.12.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.