Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(2):653-660; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn660
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/653    most recent
gfn660v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vamos, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mucsi, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vamos, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mucsi, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Sociodemographic factors and patient perceptions are associated with attitudes to kidney transplantation among haemodialysis patients

Eszter Panna Vamos1,2, Gabor Csepanyi1, Monika Zambo1, Miklos Zsolt Molnar1,3, Janos Rethelyi4, Agnes Kovacs1, Adrienn Marton2, Zsofia Nemeth2, Marta Novak1,5 and Istvan Mucsi1,2,6

1 Institute of Behavioral Sciences 2 1st Department of Internal Medicine 3 Fresenius Medical Care Dialysis Center 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary 5 Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network 6 Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Istvan Mucsi, Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Nagyvarad ter 4, Budapest, Hungary. Tel: +36-1-266-0926 Ext. 6111; Fax: +36-1-210-1220; E-mail: istvan{at}nefros.net



  Abstract

Background. Treatment decisions made by patients with chronic kidney disease are crucial in the renal transplantation process. These decisions are influenced, amongst other factors, by attitudes towards different treatment options, which are modulated by knowledge and perceptions about the disease and its treatment and many other subjective factors. Here we study the attitude of dialysis patients to renal transplantation and the association of sociodemographic characteristics, patient perceptions and experiences with this attitude.

Methods. In a cross-sectional study, all patients from eight dialysis units in Budapest, Hungary, who were on haemodialysis for at least 3 months were approached to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Data collected from 459 patients younger than 70 years were analysed in this manuscript.

Results. Mean age of the study population was 53 ± 12 years, 54% were male and the prevalence of diabetes was 22%. Patients with positive attitude to renal transplantation were younger (51 ± 11 versus 58 ± 11 years), better educated, more likely to be employed (11% versus 4%) and had prior transplantation (15% versus 7%)(P < 0.05 for all). In a multivariate model, negative patient perceptions about transplantation, negative expectations about health outcomes after transplantation and the presence of fears about the transplant surgery were associated, in addition to incre- asing age, with unwillingness to consider transplantation.

Conclusions. Negative attitudes to renal transplantation are associated with potentially modifiable factors. Based on this we suggest that it would be necessary to develop standardized, comprehensible patient information systems and personalized decision support to facilitate modality selection and to enable patients to make fully informed treatment decisions.

Keywords: attitude to renal transplantation; dialysis; end-stage renal disease; patient perceptions; renal transplantation

Received for publication: 23. 5.08
Accepted in revised form: 3.11.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.