Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 23, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(10):3186-3192; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp189
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/10/3186    most recent
gfp189v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawhney, S.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawhney, S.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Survival and dialysis initiation: comparing British Columbia and Scotland registries

Simon Sawhney1, Ognjenka Djurdjev2, Keith Simpson3, Alison Macleod1 and Adeera Levin2

1 University of Aberdeen, UK 2 University of British Columbia, Canada 3 Scottish Renal Registry, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Adeera Levin; E-mail: alevin{at}providencehealth.bc.ca



  Abstract

Background. Outcomes are a major metric for evaluating effectiveness of dialysis. Comparisons between different populations reveal significant variation. In addition, the question of optimal timing of dialysis start lacks robust data from which to generate conclusions.

Methods. This study compares dialysis survival in two geographically similar areas, Scotland and British Columbia, Canada (BC). The effect of eGFR at dialysis start on survival was also measured. Incident adult dialysis populations of Scotland (n = 3372) and BC (n = 3927), 2000–05 were compared. Mortality Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariate analysis included pre-dialysis eGFR, registry, age, sex, dialysis modality, year of start, pre-dialysis haemoglobin and primary renal diagnosis.

Results. Median survival times from start of dialysis were 38 (35–40) and 44 (42–47) months in Scotland and BC, respectively, giving an unadjusted mortality HR, Scotland versus BC, of 1.20 (95% C.I. 1.12–1.29). BC patients started dialysis at a higher eGFR (8.9 ml/min/1.73 m2) than Scotland (7.5 ml/min/1.73 m2), and prior to modelling higher starting eGFR was associated with higher mortality (1 ml/min/1.73 m2 increase, HR = 1.028; 95% C.I. 1.021–1.035). BC patients were also older and had more diabetic renal disease. In multivariate analysis, lower starting eGFR was associated with better survival, and Scotland had greater mortality than BC. General population mortality and transplantation rate had only minor influence.

Conclusions. Concepts of ‘late’ versus ‘early’ start dialysis based on eGFR alone may need modification given the complexity and confounding reasons for dialysis initiation.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; dialysis initiation; eGFR; incident patients; survival

Received for publication: 17. 2.09
Accepted in revised form: 1. 4.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Liberek, A. Warzocha, M. Chmielewski, and B. Rutkowski
Initiation of dialysis--the right timing and the right tools
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3895 - 3896.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Tattersall
Is it really better to start dialysis as late as possible?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 2972 - 2974.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.