Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on August 7, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(10):2990-2993; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp365
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/10/2990    most recent
gfp365v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drüeke, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Touam, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drüeke, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Touam, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Calcium balance in haemodialysis—do not lower the dialysate calcium concentration too much (con part)

Tilman B. Drüeke1 and Malik Touam2

1 Inserm U845, Hôpital Necker, Université Paris V 2 Association pour l’Utilisation du Rein Artificiel (AURA), Hôpital Notre Dame de Bon Secours, Paris, France

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Tilman B. Drüeke; E-mail: tilman.drueke{at}inserm.fr



  Abstract

The debate on the most adequate dialysate calcium concentration for intermittent haemodialysis therapy is ongoing. There is probably no one optimal concentration. In general, one would like to maintain a neutral calcium balance in adult haemodialysis patients. However, a slightly negative balance may be preferable to avoid soft-tissue calcium accumulation in face of net calcium loss from the bone with ageing. The problem with measurements of calcium balance is that they are generally imprecise, as are estimations of total body calcium and its distribution in various compartments, unless done with labour-intensive methods and great care. The choice of the dialysate calcium will depend on several factors, including parathyroid and vitamin D status, type and severity of concomitant bone disease, presence or absence of arterial calcification, dietary habits, drug treatment and dialysis modality. Ideally the dialysate calcium would be adapted to each patient's needs. This is not feasible, however, in most dialysis settings and neither is it cost-effective. From a practical point of view, a relatively high dialysate calcium concentration in the range of of 1.50–1.75 mmol/L (3.0–3.5 mEq/L) should probably be preferred in haemodialysis patients with high serum PTH levels who are not prescribed calcium-based phosphate binders or high doses of active vitamin D sterols, and in those who are receiving a calcimimetic. In those who are treated with high doses of calcium-based binders and/or active vitamin D derivatives or who have a very low serum PTH level, the optimal dialysate calcium concentration is probably lower, in the range of 1.25–1.50 mmol/L (2.50–3.0 mEq/L). In the present pro/con debate about the optimal dialysate calcium concentration used for the haemodialysis session, we have accepted to defend the viewpoint that a low calcium concentration may do more harm than benefit in many patients. This viewpoint is opposite to that taken by Gotch [1]. He argues that since calcitriol and other active vitamin D derivatives have become available virtually all haemodialysis patients are in positive calcium balance. We would like to take issue with this statement and warn against the indiscriminate use of a low calcium dialysate in all patients receiving haemodialysis therapy.

Keywords: calcium balance; CKD; dialysate calcium; haemodialysis; parathyroid hormone; phosphate binders; vitamin D

Received for publication: 24. 6.09
Accepted in revised form: 1. 7.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.